MT/NC/TX - Data for Progress (D): Bullock +1%, Cunningham +11%; Cornyn +3% (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 09:17:23 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 Senate & House Election Polls
  MT/NC/TX - Data for Progress (D): Bullock +1%, Cunningham +11%; Cornyn +3% (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: MT/NC/TX - Data for Progress (D): Bullock +1%, Cunningham +11%; Cornyn +3%  (Read 1124 times)
KaiserDave
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,622
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.81, S: -5.39

P
« on: October 07, 2020, 05:40:37 PM »
Don't like that Montana poll, don't believe the NC poll. Don't like this.
Logged
KaiserDave
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,622
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.81, S: -5.39

P
« Reply #1 on: October 07, 2020, 05:41:04 PM »

If Cal somehow wins I will post that phrase repeatedly in all caps on election night.
Logged
KaiserDave
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,622
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.81, S: -5.39

P
« Reply #2 on: October 07, 2020, 05:46:10 PM »
Quote from: Western Democrat on October 07, 2020, 05:42:16 PM
Quote from: KaiserDave on October 07, 2020, 05:40:37 PM
Don't like that Montana poll, don't believe the NC poll. Don't like this.

Why? These are pretty good.

If a D poll...yes it's not commissioned by a campaign but still...it's Data for Progress and Bullock is only up by one I'm fairly pessimistic on that. I'm not gonna doom, but it's concerning. As for North Carolina I believe it's almost entirely pre-Sextgate, so I'll wait for new numbers before I make conclusions.

Maybe I'm just scarred by FL-SEN 2018. That was.....unspeakably horrifying
Logged
KaiserDave
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,622
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.81, S: -5.39

P
« Reply #3 on: October 07, 2020, 05:49:47 PM »
Quote from: Western Democrat on October 07, 2020, 05:48:26 PM
Quote from: KaiserDave on October 07, 2020, 05:46:10 PM
Quote from: Western Democrat on October 07, 2020, 05:42:16 PM
Quote from: KaiserDave on October 07, 2020, 05:40:37 PM
Don't like that Montana poll, don't believe the NC poll. Don't like this.

Why? These are pretty good.

If a D poll...yes it's not commissioned by a campaign but still...it's Data for Progress and Bullock is only up by one I'm fairly pessimistic on that. I'm not gonna doom, but it's concerning. As for North Carolina I believe it's almost entirely pre-Sextgate, so I'll wait for new numbers before I make conclusions.

Maybe I'm just scarred by FL-SEN 2018. That was.....unspeakably horrifying

DFP isn’t that biased, it has a 538 rating of B- and a average D bias of D+0.0%. So not too worrying I’d say. But theres definitely reason to be cautious or skeptical.
Exactly. I'd like to see Bullock doing a bit better if Historically Sexy goes down.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 14 queries.