CNN: Biden+16 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 12:37:09 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  CNN: Biden+16 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: CNN: Biden+16  (Read 9588 times)
Roll Roons
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,038
United States


« on: October 07, 2020, 08:08:59 AM »

This race is reminding me more and more of IL-SEN 2016, just on a national stage:

*Republican who just barely got lucky by running against a corrupt/extremely unpopular Democrat in his last race is now facing completely different circumstances (far more popular opponent, lack of persuadable voters, more energized D base, erosion of suburban support, etc.) in his reelection bid which make it impossible for him to replicate his last victory.
*The incumbent is (badly) trailing a Democrat who has been considered "overrated" and "weak" and "likely to blow it" by many even when nothing suggests that this is the case.
*Many obsessively caution against underestimating the incumbent even when it should have been obvious that he’s pretty much been toast since day one.
*The incumbent eventually ends up self-destructing and loses about as badly as the polling averages have been suggesting.

(obviously not a flawless analogy)

To be fair, Mark imploded as badly as he did largely because of his stroke. If he was healthy, he would have likely still lost, but by a much smaller margin. In 2008 (!!!), he won reelection to his House seat by 6 points as Obama carried the district by 22.
Logged
Roll Roons
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,038
United States


« Reply #1 on: October 07, 2020, 09:29:14 AM »

This race is reminding me more and more of IL-SEN 2016, just on a national stage:

*Republican who just barely got lucky by running against a corrupt/extremely unpopular Democrat in his last race is now facing completely different circumstances (far more popular opponent, lack of persuadable voters, more energized D base, erosion of suburban support, etc.) in his reelection bid which make it impossible for him to replicate his last victory.
*The incumbent is (badly) trailing a Democrat who has been considered "overrated" and "weak" and "likely to blow it" by many even when nothing suggests that this is the case.
*Many obsessively caution against underestimating the incumbent even when it should have been obvious that he’s pretty much been toast since day one.
*The incumbent eventually ends up self-destructing and loses about as badly as the polling averages have been suggesting.

(obviously not a flawless analogy)

To be fair, Mark imploded as badly as he did largely because of his stroke. If he was healthy, he would have likely still lost, but by a much smaller margin. In 2008 (!!!), he won reelection to his House seat by 6 points as Obama carried the district by 22.

I thought he imploded because of the Thai debate gaffe, what did the stroke have to do with his implosion?

The stroke completely messed up his brain and made it much harder for him to campaign.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 12 queries.