Explain a Trump 2016 - Biden 2020 - Trump 2024 voter

[LAKISYLVANIA]

Idk

[Left Wing]

Conservative boomer who didn't like Trump's COVID response but will forget about it in four years.

[Cassandra]

A reactive voter who was dissatisfied with their life and wanted to shake things up in 2016, who was pissed off about COVID and the recession in 2020, and will still be pissed off about COVID and the ongoing recession in 2024 and want to punish Biden for it.

[TheTide]

Someone who hates incumbent presidents and parties.

[Medal506]

Conservative boomer who didn't like Trump's COVID response but will forget about it in four years.

Probably this.

[True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)]

Someone with memory problems.

[Red Velvet]

A boring conservative who grew tired of Trump being mean but still dislikes liberals. Years of Biden and a more liberal nominee would stimulate a different reaction in 2024.

The Clinton 2016 - Trump 2020 - Kamala 2024 voter is a much more interesting person and someone I sympathize with more.

[Goldwater]

A boring conservative who grew tired of Trump being mean but still dislikes liberals. Years of Biden and a more liberal nominee would stimulate a different reaction in 2024.

The Clinton 2016 - Trump 2020 - Kamala 2024 voter is a much more interesting person and someone I sympathize with more.

It seems rather presumptuous to already assume that Biden will die in office.

[Alben Barkley]

A boring conservative who grew tired of Trump being mean but still dislikes liberals. Years of Biden and a more liberal nominee would stimulate a different reaction in 2024.

The Clinton 2016 - Trump 2020 - Kamala 2024 voter is a much more interesting person and someone I sympathize with more.

It seems rather presumptuous to already assume that Biden will die in office.

He doesn’t have to die, might just not run again.

[Hope For A New Era]

Okay, so I know Bitecofer is controversial, but her theory points to a portion of the population that would actually do this. She proposes the existence of a group of voters called "pure independents" (as opposed to regular independents, who are actually "closet partisans"). These "pure independents" usually are not "swing voters." Instead, they're perpetually dissatisfied voters who vote only out of some kind of sense of civic duty. They break consistently against the in-power party, as long as the out-of-power party can effectively portray the in-power party as incompetent and corrupt, and they do so more and more strongly the longer a party is in power.

So in the hypothetical scenario of Trump attempting to pull a Cleveland, these would be Obama-Romney-Trump-Biden-Trump voters.


I imagine there are quite a few of them in the almighty incumbent-hater that is Montana.

[LAKISYLVANIA]

Okay, so I know Bitecofer is controversial, but her theory points to a portion of the population that would actually do this. She proposes the existence of a group of voters called "pure independents" (as opposed to regular independents, who are actually "closet partisans"). These "pure independents" usually are not "swing voters." Instead, they're perpetually dissatisfied voters who vote only out of some kind of sense of civic duty. They break consistently against the in-power party, as long as the out-of-power party can effectively portray the in-power party as incompetent and corrupt, and they do so more and more strongly the longer a party is in power.

So in the hypothetical scenario of Trump attempting to pull a Cleveland, these would be Obama-Romney-Trump-Biden-Trump voters.


I imagine there are quite a few of them in the almighty incumbent-hater that is Montana.

MT went quite strongly for Trump this year

[Hope For A New Era]

Okay, so I know Bitecofer is controversial, but her theory points to a portion of the population that would actually do this. She proposes the existence of a group of voters called "pure independents" (as opposed to regular independents, who are actually "closet partisans"). These "pure independents" usually are not "swing voters." Instead, they're perpetually dissatisfied voters who vote only out of some kind of sense of civic duty. They break consistently against the in-power party, as long as the out-of-power party can effectively portray the in-power party as incompetent and corrupt, and they do so more and more strongly the longer a party is in power.

So in the hypothetical scenario of Trump attempting to pull a Cleveland, these would be Obama-Romney-Trump-Biden-Trump voters.


I imagine there are quite a few of them in the almighty incumbent-hater that is Montana.

MT went quite strongly for Trump this year

Well, yes, but by less than in 2016.

[courts]

could be a lot of things. change in job or social circles or religion. might have changed their mind on covid or other issues. or just not fall that neatly into either party. might be one of those "vote them all out" types. i've definitely run into that

[Sir Mohamed]

The OP

[TheKentuckian]

Drunk and stupid is a hell of a way to go through life?

Just flips a coin?

Reactionary?

[darklordoftech]

Conservative boomer who didn't like Trump's COVID response but will forget about it in four years.