AK-Harstad Research (I/D): Sullivan +1 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 18, 2024, 07:57:18 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 Senate & House Election Polls
  AK-Harstad Research (I/D): Sullivan +1 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: AK-Harstad Research (I/D): Sullivan +1  (Read 732 times)
TiltsAreUnderrated
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,776
« on: September 28, 2020, 03:59:10 PM »
« edited: September 28, 2020, 04:03:49 PM by TiltsAreUnderrated »
September 20-23
602 likely voters
MoE: 4%

Sullivan 45%
Gross 44%

Sullivan won 48.0%-45.3% in 2014.
Logged
TiltsAreUnderrated
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,776
« Reply #1 on: September 28, 2020, 04:26:14 PM »
Quote from: Ontario Nature Enthusiast on September 28, 2020, 04:19:50 PM
Mike bloomberg can get a good return on investment if he spends in smaller cheaper places like Alaska,Kansas and Montana. Florida is expensive and populated and the money can get saturated there.

AK seems like the kind of place that could backfire given Gross's Independent McIndependentface campaign. If Bloomberg wanted to flip the Senate (does he?), he'd be better off investing in Hegar.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 13 queries.