Which election law change was most boneheaded? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 09:54:25 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Which election law change was most boneheaded? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: See title
#1
Georgia runoff changes
 
#2
Massachusetts U.S. Senate appointment changes
 
#3
Minnesota candidate death/removal - election postponement
 
#4
Other (please post)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 26

Author Topic: Which election law change was most boneheaded?  (Read 791 times)
Orser67
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,946
United States


« on: September 28, 2020, 01:54:55 PM »

In terms of own-goals, Walker's recount law sounds like the winner, although honestly I'm not sure how how warranted a recount is when one candidate wins by >10k votes (Evers won by ~30k votes in 2018).

But in terms of fairness, the MN law is absolutely ridiculous. Even putting aside that it may cost Democrats a House seat, the law is extremely unfair to both major party candidates, to the people of that district who will unnecessarily go without representation, and to the taxpayers who have to finance an unnecessary election.

Also, it's not a recent change, but while we're talking about terrible election laws, I'd like to throw in a mention for MS's absolutely awful quasi-electoral college system for statewide elections.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 14 queries.