Which election law change was most boneheaded? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 09:31:05 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Which election law change was most boneheaded? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: See title
#1
Georgia runoff changes
 
#2
Massachusetts U.S. Senate appointment changes
 
#3
Minnesota candidate death/removal - election postponement
 
#4
Other (please post)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 26

Author Topic: Which election law change was most boneheaded?  (Read 790 times)
Mr. Matt
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 609
United States


« on: September 26, 2020, 05:28:07 PM »

  • In Georgia, after the 1992 Senate election where incumbent Democrat Wyche Fowler lost a runoff with Republican Paul Coverdell, the Dems in the legislature changed the law only requiring a runoff if the winner had less than 45%. Max Cleland won his race in 1996 with only 48.9% of the vote. Then after Republicans got the legislature in 2005, they changed it back to 50%. link
  • In Massachusetts, the Dem legislature didn't want Mittens picking John Kerry's replacement if he won the Presidency so they changed the law to just make the Senate seat vacant until a special election. Obviously Kerry didn't win and then their law almost screwed them in 2009 when Ted Kennedy was dying. They rushed to change the law back to a gubernatorial appointment just before he died. Now that Charlie Baker is governor and if Elizabeth Warren is chosen to be in a Biden cabinet, the law might be changing again. link
  • Minnesota's laws regarding a death or withdrawal of a candidate before the general election were changed after the death of Sen. Paul Wellstone in 2002 (and probably also indirectly because of Jon Grunseth in 1990). If a "major party candidate" dies/withdraws, the regular general election is voided and a special election would be held afterwards. This of course brings us to today in MN-2 where a single-issue pro-marijuana candidate (and potential GOP plant) died suddenly, the seat may be vacant at the start of the new Congress, and incumbent Democrat Angie Craig may have to run in a low-turnout special election though she may have already won the voided general election through no fault of her own. link


If you have another example, please post it.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 15 queries.