Opinion of Roe vs Wade (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 09:49:10 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Opinion of Roe vs Wade (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Opinion of Roe vs Wade
#1
FF
 
#2
HP
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 100

Author Topic: Opinion of Roe vs Wade  (Read 2831 times)
lfromnj
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,365


« on: September 26, 2020, 04:56:01 PM »
« edited: September 26, 2020, 09:41:59 PM by lfromnj »

https://in.finance.yahoo.com/news/justice-scalia-says-jail-bearded-193812256.html

Quote
"I hate the result [in Texas v. Johnson]," Scalia said at a Q&A sponsored by Brooklyn Law.

"I would send that guy to jail so fast if I were king," he added, then referring to Gregory Lee Johnson as a "bearded weirdo."

Here's a good example of a judge being objective while still morally believing the guy should have gone to jail if he(Scalia) was king. This was flag burning.
Logged
lfromnj
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,365


« Reply #1 on: September 27, 2020, 09:24:51 AM »

Great historic decision.

The fact that it's only polling 49% here as opposed to 60%-75% nationally is one of the cases where the white male skew of this Forum really outweighs its liberalism.

Posters here, being keyed into political debates, probably are more knowledgeable on the whole than the general public about what the decision actually is. A lot of Americans support Roe v Wade, but also support restricting abortion in ways Roe does not allow.  

Bad take. First off, Roe allows for a lot (too many, imo) of exceptions. But more importantly, it's the only justification for a constitutional right to an abortion. If you overturn it because you want some exception or another, the rationale has to include that it isn't a right protected under the 14th amendment. If that goes, then you're inviting a lot of Republican legislatures to pass bans way, way, way to the right of what you deem acceptable. You can't guarantee long-term abortion rights in this country without Roe.

The thing is, is that this forum is more pro choice than the nation as a whole. Its 75% pro choice according to the current poll on this board. However this forum also understands what Roe V Wade unlike most of the nation which can't even name a SCJ. And there are plenty of pro-choice people on this forum who are skeptical of  the legal origins of Roe v Wade or even outright oppose the legal argument for Roe v Wade. The 70% polls of being pro Roe v Wade are obvious bs due to the ignorance of the average American.. The nation ranges  to the pro choice side a bit but not too far .
Logged
lfromnj
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,365


« Reply #2 on: September 29, 2020, 09:48:33 AM »

Also earlier data would be a bit circumspect due to Griswold v Connecticut not happening till 1965.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 13 queries.