Women in combat
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 04, 2024, 09:45:10 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Women in combat
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3
Poll
Question: i.e. front line - should they be allowed to serve?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No, unless a shortage of soldiers
 
#3
No under any circumstances
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 33

Author Topic: Women in combat  (Read 5913 times)
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,003
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: May 16, 2006, 10:35:23 PM »

Yes, deffinately. Don't know about drafting women though. Haven't made up my mind.

If you have women who are as capable in the military as men, why not?  If women truly want equality, they must accept the responsibility that comes with it.

Well, women and men aren't physically equal. Depends on how much training involved, but with little training it might not be the best idea.

Not all, but I'm saying that those who are physically equal to men should not be an exception just because they're women.

Of course, but we're talking about a military draft. Unless they were to draft able bodied women or something. It all depends on how they go about the draft and how much training there is.
Logged
The Dowager Mod
texasgurl
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,973
United States


Political Matrix
E: -9.48, S: -8.57

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: May 16, 2006, 10:58:16 PM »

Yes.
I was pissed when i wasn't allowed to be in combat.
Logged
Gabu
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,386
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: May 16, 2006, 11:35:47 PM »

Of course, but we're talking about a military draft. Unless they were to draft able bodied women or something. It all depends on how they go about the draft and how much training there is.

All I'm saying is this: if women really want to be equal, they should not suddenly decide that women should be given special treatment different than that given to men when equality would lead to something inconvenient for them.  It's either equality or no equality, not "equality when we like the result".
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: May 17, 2006, 12:53:23 AM »

Option 2 or 3.
Logged
Bdub
Brandon W
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,116
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: May 17, 2006, 10:57:16 AM »

Option 1. 
Logged
Democratic Hawk
LucysBeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,703
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: 2.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: May 17, 2006, 10:58:29 AM »

Absolutely

Dave
Logged
Nym90
nym90
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,260
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -2.96

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: May 17, 2006, 12:19:50 PM »

Women should be allowed in, but they should have to meet the same standards as men for gaining entry. They are going to be less likely to be qualified but if they are qualified, I see no reason to deny them entry.
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: May 17, 2006, 12:56:26 PM »

Women should be allowed in, but they should have to meet the same standards as men for gaining entry. They are going to be less likely to be qualified but if they are qualified, I see no reason to deny them entry.

And they shouldn't LOWER standards so that more women can pass.
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: May 17, 2006, 01:10:39 PM »

How many women will qualify compared to how many men, and what are the costs of trying to maintain separate facilities for them? Moreover, every intelligent person realizes men act differently around women than they do around each other.

Having women in the military is an awful idea.
Logged
Dave from Michigan
9iron768
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,298
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: May 17, 2006, 05:30:51 PM »

no
Logged
Gabu
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,386
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: May 17, 2006, 05:34:24 PM »

Women should be allowed in, but they should have to meet the same standards as men for gaining entry. They are going to be less likely to be qualified but if they are qualified, I see no reason to deny them entry.

And they shouldn't LOWER standards so that more women can pass.

Yes, which is something that no one has suggested they do...
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: May 17, 2006, 10:07:01 PM »

If they sign up--ABSOLUTELY--if it's a draft, I'd say only if needed.
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: May 18, 2006, 12:22:04 AM »

Women should be allowed in, but they should have to meet the same standards as men for gaining entry. They are going to be less likely to be qualified but if they are qualified, I see no reason to deny them entry.

And they shouldn't LOWER standards so that more women can pass.

Yes, which is something that no one has suggested they do...

Fire Departments, police departments and military schools have done so.
Logged
Nation
of_thisnation
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,555
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: May 18, 2006, 01:16:46 AM »

Women should be allowed in, but they should have to meet the same standards as men for gaining entry. They are going to be less likely to be qualified but if they are qualified, I see no reason to deny them entry.

And they shouldn't LOWER standards so that more women can pass.

Yes, which is something that no one has suggested they do...

Fire Departments, police departments and military schools have done so.

Yeah, and it's a shame that we have all these female fire fighters and police officers who are failing miserably at said jobs.
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: May 18, 2006, 01:22:05 AM »

Women should be allowed in, but they should have to meet the same standards as men for gaining entry. They are going to be less likely to be qualified but if they are qualified, I see no reason to deny them entry.

And they shouldn't LOWER standards so that more women can pass.

Yes, which is something that no one has suggested they do...

Fire Departments, police departments and military schools have done so.

Yeah, and it's a shame that we have all these female fire fighters and police officers who are failing miserably at said jobs.

I see you left out the military school part. Smiley
Logged
Nation
of_thisnation
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,555
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #40 on: May 18, 2006, 01:24:41 AM »

Women should be allowed in, but they should have to meet the same standards as men for gaining entry. They are going to be less likely to be qualified but if they are qualified, I see no reason to deny them entry.

And they shouldn't LOWER standards so that more women can pass.

Yes, which is something that no one has suggested they do...

Fire Departments, police departments and military schools have done so.

Yeah, and it's a shame that we have all these female fire fighters and police officers who are failing miserably at said jobs.

I see you left out the military school part. Smiley

Well, I'd probably argue the same thing, though obviously military is quite different than civilian jobs. At a time when we're hard pressed to find people willing to enlist -- I'd say take all the soliders you can get.

Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #41 on: May 18, 2006, 11:37:05 AM »

Women should be allowed in, but they should have to meet the same standards as men for gaining entry. They are going to be less likely to be qualified but if they are qualified, I see no reason to deny them entry.

And they shouldn't LOWER standards so that more women can pass.

Yes, which is something that no one has suggested they do...

Fire Departments, police departments and military schools have done so.

Yeah, and it's a shame that we have all these female fire fighters and police officers who are failing miserably at said jobs.

I see you left out the military school part. Smiley

Well, I'd probably argue the same thing, though obviously military is quite different than civilian jobs. At a time when we're hard pressed to find people willing to enlist -- I'd say take all the soliders you can get.



Do you know that military schools have a high female dropout rate? And after all the whining and moaning that went on to FORCE fine institutions like VMI and the Citadel to accept women many of the women that originally went in dropped out.
Logged
Nation
of_thisnation
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,555
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #42 on: May 18, 2006, 12:49:49 PM »

Women should be allowed in, but they should have to meet the same standards as men for gaining entry. They are going to be less likely to be qualified but if they are qualified, I see no reason to deny them entry.

And they shouldn't LOWER standards so that more women can pass.

Yes, which is something that no one has suggested they do...

Fire Departments, police departments and military schools have done so.

Yeah, and it's a shame that we have all these female fire fighters and police officers who are failing miserably at said jobs.

I see you left out the military school part. Smiley

Well, I'd probably argue the same thing, though obviously military is quite different than civilian jobs. At a time when we're hard pressed to find people willing to enlist -- I'd say take all the soliders you can get.



Do you know that military schools have a high female dropout rate? And after all the whining and moaning that went on to FORCE fine institutions like VMI and the Citadel to accept women many of the women that originally went in dropped out.

The dropout rate can't be extraordinarily higher than the dropout rate for men -- though I don't know what they are.

I see what you're saying, but in the end, you still end up with soldiers (whether male  or female) that you didn't have  before.
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #43 on: May 18, 2006, 01:33:48 PM »

I'm not saying I don't believe women should belong in the military, far from it, their are plenty of roles for women in the military service. Do I think women belong in front line combat? Absolutely not.
Logged
Gabu
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,386
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #44 on: May 18, 2006, 04:25:04 PM »

Women should be allowed in, but they should have to meet the same standards as men for gaining entry. They are going to be less likely to be qualified but if they are qualified, I see no reason to deny them entry.

And they shouldn't LOWER standards so that more women can pass.

Yes, which is something that no one has suggested they do...

Fire Departments, police departments and military schools have done so.

Which is ridiculous and something that never should have happened.
Logged
MasterJedi
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,666
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #45 on: May 18, 2006, 04:29:54 PM »

Yes they should be allowed to but as it has been already said they should have to pass the same requirements for men, no more or no less.
Logged
Rin-chan
rinchan089
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,097
Japan


Political Matrix
E: 6.84, S: 5.57

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #46 on: May 18, 2006, 04:45:47 PM »

Personally, I don't think most women could handle the front lines.  We react more to emotions, which would greatly affect our combat abilities.  We are not built to be as physically strong as men are.  Men would spend more time protecting us than helping themselves.

However, if the need arises or if women were drafted, I think women should be able to fight on the front lines, although they could become a liability.

I would gladly serve my country in any way I could, but I can't say that all women would.

Rin-chan
Logged
Virginian87
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,598
Political Matrix
E: -3.55, S: 2.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #47 on: May 18, 2006, 08:00:49 PM »

No, not under any circumstances will I ever support letting women into combat, or to join the military except as either nurses or secretaries.  And neither would I support having women be made eligible for the draft. 

^^^^^^^^^^^Option 3 for me too.  I would have to agree with Frodo and States on this topic.

I believe that the military academies should not have been forced to become co-ed as well.  As States points out, there was no reason for VMI and the Citadel to change from their all-male policy when nearly all the female cadets drop out anyway.  Most women cannot take the emotional environment of an Annapolis or West Point.
Logged
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,300
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #48 on: May 18, 2006, 09:28:21 PM »

Most women cannot take the emotional environment of an Annapolis or West Point.

Even if this is true, why should the ones who are emotionally ready not be allowed?

Whether it's combat or military academies, obviously a higher percentage of men than women would excel at it, but that doesn't mean that the few women who can make it, should be denied their rights.
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #49 on: May 18, 2006, 11:06:35 PM »

Most women cannot take the emotional environment of an Annapolis or West Point.

Haha, by 'emotional environment' do you mean getting raped and otherwise attacked or harrassed all the time?
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.065 seconds with 13 queries.