NYTimes/Siena - Kelly+8 in AZ, Gideon+5 in ME, Golden+19 in ME-02, Cunningham+5 in NC (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 18, 2024, 11:01:38 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 Senate & House Election Polls
  NYTimes/Siena - Kelly+8 in AZ, Gideon+5 in ME, Golden+19 in ME-02, Cunningham+5 in NC (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: NYTimes/Siena - Kelly+8 in AZ, Gideon+5 in ME, Golden+19 in ME-02, Cunningham+5 in NC  (Read 1302 times)
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,085
« on: September 18, 2020, 05:21:38 AM »
ME-02: WOW! Golden is safe.

NC: So many undecideds, but I assume it will likely close track with the prez race. However, Cunningham has a +17 fav versus Tillis at only +1. So Cunningham likely has more upside here.

ME: Interesting that Collins favs are better here than normal (50/47), but problem for his is that Giden is more liked (55/41). Also, as many other polls have shown - Gideon is getting nearly ALL Democrats. Not much ticket splitting. That plus Gideon is winning Indies by 8, and as far as I can tell, Gideon has been winning indies is nearly every poll.
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,085
« Reply #1 on: September 18, 2020, 07:42:35 AM »
The original Maine rundown was Gideon 44, Colins 40 before RV, so Gideon actually gains a pt when RCV is done
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.016 seconds with 13 queries.