ME, SC, KY - Quinnipiac: Gideon +12, Tied, McConnell +12
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 01:02:58 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 Senate & House Election Polls
  ME, SC, KY - Quinnipiac: Gideon +12, Tied, McConnell +12
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4
Author Topic: ME, SC, KY - Quinnipiac: Gideon +12, Tied, McConnell +12  (Read 5006 times)
politicallefty
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,244
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -9.22

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: September 16, 2020, 01:37:06 PM »

Don't tempt me like this. I have no words for the idea of Trump and Graham both going down on the same night.
Logged
tagimaucia
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 570


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: September 16, 2020, 01:38:43 PM »

I guess I just don't have enough of an imagination but its really hard for me to picture a hypothetical Trump/Harrison voter in my mind.
Logged
libertpaulian
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,611
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: September 16, 2020, 01:40:19 PM »

SC is definitely going to be a sleeper state this year and should be a future Democratic target this decade.
Logged
President Johnson
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,888
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.70


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: September 16, 2020, 01:42:35 PM »

Not buying this until backed up by other pollsters. I'd like to be an optimist, but these numbers are too Democratic friendly. Gideon is certainly ahead right now, but not by this margin. And South Carolina is Likely Republican at least. As much as I'd like to see sellout Graham lose, I don't think it will happen.
Logged
DrScholl
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,137
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: September 16, 2020, 01:43:49 PM »

Graham has seemed quite concerned about Harrison lately, so these numbers explain why. Graham is probably seeing something in his internal polling that is troubling.
Logged
xavier110
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,540
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: September 16, 2020, 01:48:20 PM »

Harrison tied is a little outlandish IMO, but I don't find the Collins results that implausible. The Senate race results shouldn't deviate much from the presidential, and I find it easy to imagine Biden winning statewide by double digits here.
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,215


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: September 16, 2020, 01:48:38 PM »

Not buying this until backed up by other pollsters. I'd like to be an optimist, but these numbers are too Democratic friendly. Gideon is certainly ahead right now, but not by this margin. And South Carolina is Likely Republican at least. As much as I'd like to see sellout Graham lose, I don't think it will happen.

the DDHQ poll average for SC-Senate is Graham +2.4. The few polls that we've gotten since Summer began have all pointed to a <5 pt race
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,215


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: September 16, 2020, 01:49:49 PM »

SC feels a lot like TX-2018 where people wouldn't believe that it was close until they saw it with their own eyes. Even though now it doesn't seem that farfetched, polling indicates its close, and Graham's behavior seems to confirm that.

Meanwhile, with the insane amount of $ that Gideon and Harrison have raised, do we think that they're also just doing better because they've been flooding the airwaves too?
Logged
New York En Marche!
amcrmcm
Rookie
**
Posts: 89


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: September 16, 2020, 01:49:55 PM »

Harrison tied is a little outlandish IMO, but I don't find the Collins results that implausible. The Senate race results shouldn't deviate much from the presidential, and I find it easy to imagine Biden winning statewide by double digits here.


The problem with this poll is that it does deviate from the presidential. They have Biden up 21, which is really a lot. Gideon underperforming by 9 would make it a tossup with a more normal Biden margin
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,305
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: September 16, 2020, 01:50:10 PM »

Given the presidential numbers, these are all too favorable for the Democrats, but it's still very bad for Collins to only be overperforming Trump by 3.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,181
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: September 16, 2020, 01:50:28 PM »

The Harrison-Graham race reminds me of the Ford-Corker race in 2006 ...
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,215


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: September 16, 2020, 01:52:14 PM »

I will say though, there has been no poll that has materialized that confirms Collins is getting any more crossover support than a normal R would get. So that in and of itself seems to prove that she's most likely finished, if Ds all vote the same way.
Logged
ηєω ƒяσηтιєя
New Frontier
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,254
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.42, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: September 16, 2020, 01:52:29 PM »

Susan Collins is Margaret Chase Smith in 1972

Also, this ↴
Logged
TiltsAreUnderrated
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,776


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: September 16, 2020, 01:58:33 PM »

SC is definitely going to be a sleeper state this year and should be a future Democratic target this decade.


No. The last of the ancestral Democrats will fall away, the black population is declining faster in this state than anywhere else bar D.C. and it's an attractive retirement destination (I don't think most of 2020's senior party switchers are going to stay in the Democratic column for more than a presidential cycle). The suburbs are probably also going to be a lot more resistant to large, pro-Democratic swings than in e.g. GA or MI/MN/WI.

South Carolina is occasionally hyped up as on the verge of being there, but I think it is one of the bleaker long-term prospects for Democrats. The state GOP is also particularly competent and less alienating relative to Republican outfits in neighbouring states.

Democrats only have a real chance here in 2020 because Graham is an increasingly weak candidate, Harrison is excellent and Biden doesn't seem a bad fit for the state/has invested in here for a long time.
Logged
xavier110
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,540
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: September 16, 2020, 02:02:24 PM »

SC feels a lot like TX-2018 where people wouldn't believe that it was close until they saw it with their own eyes. Even though now it doesn't seem that farfetched, polling indicates its close, and Graham's behavior seems to confirm that.

Meanwhile, with the insane amount of $ that Gideon and Harrison have raised, do we think that they're also just doing better because they've been flooding the airwaves too?

I don't know about SC being similar to TX in 2018. While Graham does seem to be widely reviled, and an especially good target because he animates the left and the right is largely apathetic about him, I can't get over the racial politics of South Carolina.

I just do not see how Harrison is able to assemble a coalition that gets him 48% of the vote in SC. I think the only spoiler/outside chance is if the Constitution party nominee somehow eats up a sizable share of the vote -- 5-10%, leaving Harrison an outside shot with mid-40% at winning.
Logged
Alben Barkley
KYWildman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,301
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.97, S: -5.74

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #40 on: September 16, 2020, 02:09:35 PM »

Too bad McGrath wasn’t defeated in the primary ...

Booker would have lost too. The only candidates with a chance (Adkins, maybe Jones, maybe even Steve Beshear) didn’t run.

As a Kentuckian, I am begging Democrats nationwide and the national party to triage my state and give every dollar that you would have given to McGrath to Harrison instead. He actually is a good candidate who actually has a chance. And as much as I would love to oust McConnell, it’s not happening. All chance of that was lost when Schumer and the DSCC went all-in on McGrath for some baffling reason. And ousting Graham is the next best thing. Plus, take back the Senate and you at least strip McConnell of his power as Majority Leader.
Logged
KaiserDave
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,622
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.81, S: -5.39

P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #41 on: September 16, 2020, 02:15:03 PM »

Logged
Alben Barkley
KYWildman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,301
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.97, S: -5.74

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #42 on: September 16, 2020, 02:19:22 PM »
« Edited: September 16, 2020, 02:22:49 PM by Alben Barkley »

SC feels a lot like TX-2018 where people wouldn't believe that it was close until they saw it with their own eyes. Even though now it doesn't seem that farfetched, polling indicates its close, and Graham's behavior seems to confirm that.

Meanwhile, with the insane amount of $ that Gideon and Harrison have raised, do we think that they're also just doing better because they've been flooding the airwaves too?

I don't know about SC being similar to TX in 2018. While Graham does seem to be widely reviled, and an especially good target because he animates the left and the right is largely apathetic about him, I can't get over the racial politics of South Carolina.

I just do not see how Harrison is able to assemble a coalition that gets him 48% of the vote in SC. I think the only spoiler/outside chance is if the Constitution party nominee somehow eats up a sizable share of the vote -- 5-10%, leaving Harrison an outside shot with mid-40% at winning.

The racial politics are changing. Largely white areas like the Charleston suburbs are becoming less Republican. Perhaps instead of Texas, it’s better to think of SC as the next Georgia: Solid black Democratic vote, increasingly less Republican white suburban vote, and rapid population growth concentrated in (sub)urban areas. True, there’s no Atlanta metro equivalent or anything. But over time, as the state continues to grow and change, I can see it being the next state in the sun belt to fall after AZ/TX/GA/NC. As for now, Harrison’s shot depends on a solidly Democratic national environment (looks likely) coupled with an energized anti-Graham vote in the state along with a Republican vote that largely ranges from apathetic to antipathetic towards Graham. That ad of Graham bashing Trump and praising Biden sums it up: Diehard MAGA people don’t trust Graham, and Democrats hate him for his sucking up to Trump. Could be a perfect storm.
Logged
DrScholl
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,137
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #43 on: September 16, 2020, 02:35:45 PM »

It's possible that Trump supporters could just leave the Senate blank. Not all of them feel as if they have to vote all the way down the ballot or as if they owe other GOP candidates their votes.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,697
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #44 on: September 16, 2020, 02:40:41 PM »

This should finish Collins off, no one other than MT Treasurer believes that Collins will win
Logged
SenatorCouzens
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 267
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #45 on: September 16, 2020, 02:44:23 PM »

Harrison tied is a little outlandish IMO, but I don't find the Collins results that implausible. The Senate race results shouldn't deviate much from the presidential, and I find it easy to imagine Biden winning statewide by double digits here.


The problem with this poll is that it does deviate from the presidential. They have Biden up 21, which is really a lot. Gideon underperforming by 9 would make it a tossup with a more normal Biden margin

Exactly. Clearly an awful poll for Collins and I'm not going to dispute that, but we can't ignore the fact this same poll has Gideon underperforming Biden by 9.
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,215


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #46 on: September 16, 2020, 02:46:45 PM »

Harrison tied is a little outlandish IMO, but I don't find the Collins results that implausible. The Senate race results shouldn't deviate much from the presidential, and I find it easy to imagine Biden winning statewide by double digits here.


The problem with this poll is that it does deviate from the presidential. They have Biden up 21, which is really a lot. Gideon underperforming by 9 would make it a tossup with a more normal Biden margin

Exactly. Clearly an awful poll for Collins and I'm not going to dispute that, but we can't ignore the fact this same poll has Gideon underperforming Biden by 9.

Well of course. Collins is going to run ahead of Trump. That's obvious.

This poll isn't inherently anti-GOP though. Collins has a 43/51 favorable here which seems pretty in step with most of the other polls out of Maine we've seen...
Logged
SenatorCouzens
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 267
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #47 on: September 16, 2020, 02:52:44 PM »

Harrison tied is a little outlandish IMO, but I don't find the Collins results that implausible. The Senate race results shouldn't deviate much from the presidential, and I find it easy to imagine Biden winning statewide by double digits here.


The problem with this poll is that it does deviate from the presidential. They have Biden up 21, which is really a lot. Gideon underperforming by 9 would make it a tossup with a more normal Biden margin

Exactly. Clearly an awful poll for Collins and I'm not going to dispute that, but we can't ignore the fact this same poll has Gideon underperforming Biden by 9.

Well of course. Collins is going to run ahead of Trump. That's obvious.

This poll isn't inherently anti-GOP though. Collins has a 43/51 favorable here which seems pretty in step with most of the other polls out of Maine we've seen...

Fair enough. But I don't think anyone is saying that "of course" Collins margin against Gideon is going to be NINE points better than Trump's against Biden. It's a silver lining for Collins in what is a very bad poll for her indeed. If Collins somehow improves and ekes out a victory on election day (unlikely) her ability to run not only ahead, but well ahead, of Trump will (of course) be the reason.
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,840
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #48 on: September 16, 2020, 02:57:30 PM »

That Lieberman endorsement really turned things around for Collins, didn't it?
Logged
Calthrina950
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,936
United States


P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #49 on: September 16, 2020, 03:00:48 PM »

I doubt that Collins is going to lose by this much, but this poll provides yet further confirmation of how much trouble she is in at this stage. This also confirms that McConnell's race has never been anything other than Safe R, and that Lindsey Graham is in for the closest race of his career, even though I don't think Harrison is polling that well.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.056 seconds with 12 queries.