S.20.3-16: Family Opportunity Fund Act (Law'd) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 12:42:55 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government
  Regional Governments (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  S.20.3-16: Family Opportunity Fund Act (Law'd) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: S.20.3-16: Family Opportunity Fund Act (Law'd)  (Read 2269 times)
diptheriadan
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,375


« on: September 08, 2020, 06:58:40 PM »

I'm not entirely sure whether the tax would actually cover this. I'm still trying to find state-based data on the number of children, but according to this website, there are 73.7 million in the United States. 1/3rd of that would be 24,321,000 in the South. At 6,000 a year per child, that would be 145,926,000,000$ a year, which is something like 3x what our current budget surplus is.
Logged
diptheriadan
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,375


« Reply #1 on: September 08, 2020, 08:40:10 PM »

Also, according to the 2018 budget, a 4% income tax would only bring in 19.04$ billion, which, when factoring in that this is just for incomes exceeding 100,000$ as well as the decreased total revenue because of the pandemic/recession, is probably comparable to this hypothetical 5% tax.
Logged
diptheriadan
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,375


« Reply #2 on: September 10, 2020, 06:03:17 PM »

So, capping the money to only those below the poverty line is going to have to be a must.
Logged
diptheriadan
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,375


« Reply #3 on: September 11, 2020, 03:44:15 PM »

We'll need a report from the GM (or is it the Comptroller General who does cost estimates now?), but even then that might not be enough, as we're still looking at this bill costing well more than our current  surplus.
Logged
diptheriadan
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,375


« Reply #4 on: September 20, 2020, 05:04:15 PM »

Abstain
Logged
diptheriadan
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,375


« Reply #5 on: September 24, 2020, 05:31:41 AM »

Honestly, unless we minimize who is getting this money, I don't even really see a point in debating it. I'm not comfortable taxing an incredible amount of money for one program that's mainly going to benefit people that don't even really need it.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 10 queries.