CA GOV 2021 - 2022 megathread
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 28, 2024, 10:58:05 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  CA GOV 2021 - 2022 megathread
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 87 88 89 90 91 [92] 93 94 95 96 97 ... 100
Author Topic: CA GOV 2021 - 2022 megathread  (Read 128479 times)
Greedo punched first
ERM64man
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,810


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2275 on: September 20, 2021, 08:13:24 PM »

Did any Feinstein 2018 counties flip to yes so far?
Logged
Dr Oz Lost Party!
PittsburghSteel
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,038
United States


P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2276 on: September 20, 2021, 08:20:34 PM »

Larry Elder teasing a 2022 run?


Cringe.
Logged
E-Dawg
Guy
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2277 on: September 20, 2021, 10:47:33 PM »
« Edited: September 20, 2021, 10:51:12 PM by Guy »

Did any Feinstein 2018 counties flip to yes so far?
Every Feinstein 2018 county voted no and none of them look likely to flip. If you meant Newsom 2018, then Merced already flipped to yes and San Bernadino most likely will too

San Bernardino shifted from +4.0% NO with 60% reporting to +3.6% NO With 77% reporting. Won't come close to flipping if the rate of changes stays the same.

Riverside shifted from +4.8% NO with 62% reporting to just +3.4% NO with 76% reporting. If it keeps shifting at that same rate, it will be very close but still not enough to flip.
My bolded takes above now look to have been wrong, the late ballots were a lot more Yes-leaning than we expected.
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,766


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2278 on: September 21, 2021, 05:21:42 AM »

We've crossed 11M

89% reporting

NO 6,984,595 (63.0%)
YES 4,094,764 (37.0%)

= 11,079,359
Logged
Greedo punched first
ERM64man
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,810


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2279 on: September 21, 2021, 09:20:39 AM »

Is CA-48 the only Feinstein 2018 House district that voted for the recall?
Logged
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,778
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2280 on: September 21, 2021, 09:27:51 AM »

Did any Feinstein 2018 counties flip to yes so far?
Every Feinstein 2018 county voted no and none of them look likely to flip. If you meant Newsom 2018, then Merced already flipped to yes and San Bernadino most likely will too

San Bernardino shifted from +4.0% NO with 60% reporting to +3.6% NO With 77% reporting. Won't come close to flipping if the rate of changes stays the same.

Riverside shifted from +4.8% NO with 62% reporting to just +3.4% NO with 76% reporting. If it keeps shifting at that same rate, it will be very close but still not enough to flip.
My bolded takes above now look to have been wrong, the late ballots were a lot more Yes-leaning than we expected.

L.A. county updates this evening, likely with a big pro-R batch of votes given what we saw elsewhere in SoCal yesterday.  L.A. probably falls below 70% No when this is all said and done, which would be a notbable underperformance vs. Newsom 2018/Biden 2020. 
Logged
Greedo punched first
ERM64man
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,810


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2281 on: September 21, 2021, 09:37:15 AM »

Are there any Cox 2018 districts other than CA-39 and CA-45 that voted no?
Logged
_.
Abdullah
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,898
United States
P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2282 on: September 21, 2021, 05:17:32 PM »


(Numbers in parentheses represent changes since Friday's update)

70.67% (-0.01%) / 1,902,791 votes (+141,838) / NO
29.33% (+0.01%) / 789,638 votes (+59,175) / YES



Los Angeles County stands firmly within the "No" column, refusing to dip below 70%.
Logged
_.
Abdullah
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,898
United States
P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2283 on: September 21, 2021, 05:26:07 PM »


(Numbers in parentheses represent changes since Friday's update)

61.97% (-1.45%) / 276,304 votes (+41,005) / NO
38.03% (+1.45%) / 169,596 votes (+33,898) / YES



In the capital, though, things look very different, as "Yes" makes a gain of nearly 3% in the margin.
Logged
Progressive Pessimist
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,876
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.71, S: -7.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2284 on: September 21, 2021, 05:45:10 PM »


Boooo. Riverside just flipped to yes

Yes  339,496  50.04   (+0.57)
No   339,020  49.96    (-0.57)


30k VBM + 5k provisionals left to count

Dems in disarray! The California GOP returns from the dead!
Logged
_.
Abdullah
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,898
United States
P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2285 on: September 21, 2021, 06:07:07 PM »


(Numbers in parentheses represent changes since yesterday's update)

50.2803% (+0.0044%) / 279,015 votes (+26,667) / NO
49.7197% (-0.0044%) / 275,904 votes (+26,326) / YES



Oh, wow, this is coming down to the wire, isn't it?
Logged
Kamala's side hoe
khuzifenq
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,411
United States


P P
WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2286 on: September 21, 2021, 06:38:34 PM »

L.A. county updates this evening, likely with a big pro-R batch of votes given what we saw elsewhere in SoCal yesterday.  L.A. probably falls below 70% No when this is all said and done, which would be a notbable underperformance vs. Newsom 2018/Biden 2020. 

>95% of estimated votes currently in, Yes is leading 70.7%-29.3% per NYT (as Abdullah posted).
Logged
Greedo punched first
ERM64man
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,810


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2287 on: September 21, 2021, 07:40:15 PM »

Will CA-48 flip to no?
Logged
Devils30
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,054
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.06, S: -4.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2288 on: September 21, 2021, 07:43:31 PM »

This just wasn't a terribly impressive showing for Rs, there's no way around it. Even the rural places they improved in like Fresno, Merced, Stanislaus had fewer voters than 2018 while Orange had more. A lot of the GOP Hispanic improvement on the edges is just off-year turnout differences common to Cali elections.
Logged
Oryxslayer
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,008


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2289 on: September 21, 2021, 08:22:41 PM »
« Edited: September 21, 2021, 08:45:37 PM by Oryxslayer »

This just wasn't a terribly impressive showing for Rs, there's no way around it. Even the rural places they improved in like Fresno, Merced, Stanislaus had fewer voters than 2018 while Orange had more. A lot of the GOP Hispanic improvement on the edges is just off-year turnout differences common to Cali elections.

yeah this is what we need to remember. If there's a reason OC voted to the left of the Inland Empire it was because the latter's Dem base is almost entirely Hispanic, so poor turnout like in the valley flips counties and sometimes districts without flipping voters.
Logged
_.
Abdullah
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,898
United States
P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2290 on: September 21, 2021, 08:36:47 PM »


(Numbers in parentheses represent changes since yesterday's update)

50.36% (+0.31%) / 350,999 votes (+11,503) / YES
49.64% (-0.31%) / 346,011 votes (+6,991) / NO



This just wasn't a terribly impressive showing for Rs, there's no way around it. Even the rural places they improved in like Fresno, Merced, Stanislaus had fewer voters than 2018 while Orange had more. A lot of the GOP Hispanic improvement on the edges is just off-year turnout differences common to Cali elections.

yeah this is what we need to remember. If there's a reason OC voted to the left of the Inland Empire it was because the latter's Dem base is almost entirely Hispanic, so poor turnout like in the valley flips districts without flipping voters.

I'd argue it mainly has to do with the presence of East and Southeast Asians in Orange County, specifically the Vietnamese. Without which the margins may look different.
Logged
Pericles
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,156


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2291 on: September 21, 2021, 08:36:57 PM »

Any data on the margins by congressional district? That might be the only useful information to come from this huge waste of time and money.
Logged
S019
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,392
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -4.13, S: -1.39

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2292 on: September 21, 2021, 08:39:56 PM »

Are there any Cox 2018 districts other than CA-39 and CA-45 that voted no?

Wait where did you get this CD data, I've been looking for it everywhere.
Logged
Greedo punched first
ERM64man
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,810


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2293 on: September 21, 2021, 08:44:26 PM »

Are there any Cox 2018 districts other than CA-39 and CA-45 that voted no?

Wait where did you get this CD data, I've been looking for it everywhere.
From Wikipedia. This map shows that Cox won CA-39 and CA-45 in 2018.

Logged
S019
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,392
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -4.13, S: -1.39

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2294 on: September 21, 2021, 08:47:56 PM »

Are there any Cox 2018 districts other than CA-39 and CA-45 that voted no?

Wait where did you get this CD data, I've been looking for it everywhere.
From Wikipedia. This map shows that Cox won CA-39 and CA-45 in 2018.



No I mean the evidence that CA-39 voted No, I can't find LA and Riverside numbers for that district
Logged
Greedo punched first
ERM64man
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,810


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2295 on: September 21, 2021, 08:49:48 PM »

Are there any Cox 2018 districts other than CA-39 and CA-45 that voted no?

Wait where did you get this CD data, I've been looking for it everywhere.
From Wikipedia. This map shows that Cox won CA-39 and CA-45 in 2018.

No I mean the evidence that CA-39 voted No, I can't find LA and Riverside numbers for that district
CA-39 doesn't cover Riverside County.
Logged
S019
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,392
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -4.13, S: -1.39

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2296 on: September 21, 2021, 09:07:18 PM »

Are there any Cox 2018 districts other than CA-39 and CA-45 that voted no?

Wait where did you get this CD data, I've been looking for it everywhere.
From Wikipedia. This map shows that Cox won CA-39 and CA-45 in 2018.

No I mean the evidence that CA-39 voted No, I can't find LA and Riverside numbers for that district
CA-39 doesn't cover Riverside County.

I mean San Bernardino, I thought Chino Hills was in Riverside for some reason.
Logged
Interlocutor is just not there yet
Interlocutor
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,204


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -5.04

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2297 on: September 21, 2021, 10:14:50 PM »

Any data on the margins by congressional district? That might be the only useful information to come from this huge waste of time and money.

Are there any Cox 2018 districts other than CA-39 and CA-45 that voted no?

Wait where did you get this CD data, I've been looking for it everywhere.

To answer both questions, Orange County seems to be one of the few CA counties that tend to release districtwide votes with each update. That's why there's totals out for the OC House districts.

For every other country, you're gonna have to wait until they finish & release their statement of votes or when the state releases the supplemental.


As an aside, I'm jealous of how great the Orange County Registrar of Voters site is in terms of data & information. In contrast, Riverside & San Bernardino's provide the bare minimum with web design that looks to have been untouched since 2008
Logged
DINGO Joe
dingojoe
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,689
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2298 on: September 21, 2021, 10:24:38 PM »

Any data on the margins by congressional district? That might be the only useful information to come from this huge waste of time and money.

Are there any Cox 2018 districts other than CA-39 and CA-45 that voted no?

Wait where did you get this CD data, I've been looking for it everywhere.

To answer both questions, Orange County seems to be one of the few CA counties that tend to release districtwide votes with each update. That's why there's totals out for the OC House districts.

For every other country, you're gonna have to wait until they finish & release their statement of votes or when the state releases the supplemental.


As an aside, I'm jealous of how great the Orange County Registrar of Voters site is in terms of data & information. In contrast, Riverside & San Bernardino's provide the bare minimum with web design that looks to have been untouched since 2008


It's like not even having to leave home (Atlas)
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,317


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2299 on: September 21, 2021, 11:09:07 PM »

Are there any Cox 2018 districts other than CA-39 and CA-45 that voted no?

Wait where did you get this CD data, I've been looking for it everywhere.
From Wikipedia. This map shows that Cox won CA-39 and CA-45 in 2018.



No I mean the evidence that CA-39 voted No, I can't find LA and Riverside numbers for that district

While I don't have precise numbers out of CA-39's LA County portion, there is precinct data that shows No carried every single precinct in Diamond Bar, Rowland Heights, Hacienda Heights and Walnut. It is safe to say this will flip the district to no considering the small lead for yes out of Orange County. Not to mention Chino Hills is very similar to these aforementioned cities and I would argue is more similar to these cities than anywhere else in San Bernardino County.

https://www.latimes.com/projects/newsom-recall-election-results-southern-california-analysis/
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 87 88 89 90 91 [92] 93 94 95 96 97 ... 100  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.057 seconds with 12 queries.