Trump's 2016 suburban performance was pretty good
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 06:45:05 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Trump's 2016 suburban performance was pretty good
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Trump's 2016 suburban performance was pretty good  (Read 674 times)
Arizona Iced Tea
Minute Maid Juice
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,776


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: January 23, 2024, 01:21:05 AM »

At the time the general consensus was that Trump's 2016 performance in the suburbs was uniquely awful, and that conventional Rs could do better. However, that hasn't really happened in most sunbelt suburbs and like Bush 2004, and Romney 2012, Trump 2016 in the suburbs may never be repeated again.

"Only" D+2 in Cobb, and D+5 in Gwinnett is spectacular compared to Republicans today. Even Kemp couldn't do better in Cobb in 2022, and Raffensberger did much worse in Gwinnett compared to Trump 2016 despite being "better" Republicans for the suburbs.

Winning Johnson county KS today is pretty much impossible, but Trump was able to carry it by a small margin of 2pts. Even the boring, popular, Insurance Commissioner only won it by 3 in 2022 despite having incumbency advantage against a weak Dem opponent.

With the exception of Abbott in 2018, no Republican since Trump 2016 has managed margins like that in DFW. R+8.5 in Tarrant county is pretty much impossible for any R in the Lone Star State anymore. Trump also got R+17 and R+20 in Collin and Denton counties, which even downballot Rs are only winning by 10 and 15 respectively.

The Austin area has had the biggest shift though. Trump was the last Republican to carry Hays county, even Abbott couldn't pull it off. Even Wayne Christian in the R+15 railroad commissioner race lost it by 6 points. Trump carried Williamson county by double digits, in todays world Rs are struggling to pull off a narrow win there, let alone double digits. After 2022, I do not think Rs will win Williamson county in the foreseeable future.

There are a lot more suburban areas we can look at, but I guess my point is that although once viewed as rock-bottom, Trump's 2016 suburban performance today is borderline impossible for even a competent generic R to even match in a good year.
Logged
Devils30
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,987
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.06, S: -4.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: January 23, 2024, 12:43:10 PM »

And this is why Biden could still win even if he has defections on his left to third parties. Trump will not get the numbers in 2024 in places like Kent, Maricopa, Cobb, Ozaukee that he got in 2016.
Logged
Arizona Iced Tea
Minute Maid Juice
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,776


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: January 23, 2024, 04:39:21 PM »

And this is why Biden could still win even if he has defections on his left to third parties. Trump will not get the numbers in 2024 in places like Kent, Maricopa, Cobb, Ozaukee that he got in 2016.
Honestly due to coalition shift, if Trump matches his 2020 suburban numbers he will probably still win those states now. Likewise if Rs in 2028 get Trump 2024 margins and so on.
Logged
LabourJersey
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,190
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: January 26, 2024, 08:34:55 AM »

This thesis seems to be based on the assumption that the suburban trends you're talking about were inevitable.

In some cases that might be true - but in many other cases the trends happened *because* Trumpism, the Trump presidency, and the fallout from that.
Logged
Smash255
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,451


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: January 26, 2024, 10:43:38 AM »

This thesis seems to be based on the assumption that the suburban trends you're talking about were inevitable.

In some cases that might be true - but in many other cases the trends happened *because* Trumpism, the Trump presidency, and the fallout from that.

Its a combination of the two in many ways.   Those suburban trends in many cases were happening prior to Trump (though Romney was able to soften them or in some cases reverse them for the time being).  However, Trump put the pedal to the metal and sped up the suburban trends.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.211 seconds with 12 queries.