Why did Perot do so badly in the South? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 09:40:45 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Why did Perot do so badly in the South? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why did Perot do so badly in the South?  (Read 560 times)
KoopaDaQuick 🇵🇸
KoopaDaQuick
Moderators
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,304
Anguilla


Political Matrix
E: -8.50, S: -5.74


WWW
« on: August 20, 2020, 05:29:15 PM »
Bill Clinton and George Bush resonated much better with the South, meanwhile Ross Perot was more of a national candidate. I think Perot would've done a lot better in the electoral college if he focused on a few states like Maine and Utah, although this probably would've costed him in the popular vote.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 12 queries.