1956: Why did so many Western and Midwestern states swing against Ike? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 03:07:09 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  1956: Why did so many Western and Midwestern states swing against Ike? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 1956: Why did so many Western and Midwestern states swing against Ike?  (Read 747 times)
E-Dawg
Guy
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 556
United States


« on: August 16, 2020, 12:26:05 PM »

Although Ike did better in the nationwide popular vote in 1956 compared to 1952, most of this was due to gains in the East and South. In the Midwest and West, Eisenhower lost ground to Stevenson in most states, some by significant margins. The states that swung this way were California, Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, Colorado, North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas, Minnesota, Iowa, and Missouri (which actually flipped from Ike to Stevenson!)  Mississippi and South Carolina in the South did as well, but those are self-explanatory (Dixiecrats who supported Ike in 52 swung against him and to the unpledged ticket due to his pro-civil rights record). What in Ike's presidency caused him to lose ground in such a large part of the country? Did it have anything to do with farm issues? I haven't been able to get an answer for this yet.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 13 queries.