There was no stopping Bill that year. Dole was a sacrificial lamb. Economy was starting to roar, Bill was on the upswing. It was kinda like 1984 in that regard. Some boring dude who ran for VP before in the other party was never gonna stop the popular, charismatic incumbent. In fact I’d say 1996 was the last year the outcome was absolutely certain most of the way through. 2008 was pretty clear after the financial crisis really hit but not quite as much early on. Dole never had a shot.
If it's comparable to 1984 though, why did Clinton not only not experience a 1984/1964-esque sweep but actually lose a few states he won in 1992? That question's always irked me.
1. Dem turnout collapse-Clinton had it in the bag
2. Good GOP turnout hoping to keep Congress
3. Even before Lewinsky scandal, a lot of people thought Clinton was a sleaze bag...
4. Dole still did worse than any Republican in the modern era not named Barry Goldwater