Does Maura Healey lose any counties?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 05:36:37 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Does Maura Healey lose any counties?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Does Maura Healey lose any counties?  (Read 722 times)
Bernie Derangement Syndrome Haver
freethinkingindy
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,274
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: July 31, 2022, 11:32:57 PM »

There's an outside chance she could lose Plymouth County to Geoff Diehl, who won it against Elizabeth Warren in 2018.
Bristol County is weird in that it is trending R (WWC) while suburban Plymouth is trending D (at least under Biden, yet it was also more Warren-averse than most parts of the state). But no indication that Bristol is winnable for the GOP yet.

Logged
Senator Incitatus
AMB1996
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,510
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.06, S: 5.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: August 01, 2022, 08:45:27 AM »

I don't think so, right now.
Logged
Progressive Pessimist
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,162
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.71, S: -7.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: August 01, 2022, 06:01:44 PM »

I doubt it. I still think Warren losing Bristol in 2018 had more to do with Baker being on the ballot.
Logged
Senator Incitatus
AMB1996
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,510
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.06, S: 5.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: August 01, 2022, 08:43:35 PM »

I doubt it. I still think Warren losing Bristol in 2018 had more to do with Baker being on the ballot.

It was also a product of Diehl's home-field advantage and Warren being the least popular elected official in the state.
Logged
MillennialModerate
MillennialMAModerate
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,016
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: August 02, 2022, 04:53:35 AM »

I know who would never lose a single county against a Republican….


Smiley
Logged
Schiff for Senate
CentristRepublican
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,247
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: August 02, 2022, 06:30:46 PM »

I know who would never lose a single county against a Republican….


Smiley

The Kennedys are done, sorry. Joe Kennedy destroyed his own political career by being too entitled to wait his turn and deciding to primary the competent and progressive Ed Markey for no good reason other than "I'm a Kennedy so vote for me."
Logged
Progressive Pessimist
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,162
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.71, S: -7.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: August 02, 2022, 06:37:25 PM »

I doubt it. I still think Warren losing Bristol in 2018 had more to do with Baker being on the ballot.

It was also a product of Diehl's home-field advantage and Warren being the least popular elected official in the state.

By the way, I realize now I meant Plymouth, not Bristol in my original post.

But anyway, I don't expect his home turf advantage to help him much here this time around.
Logged
Senator Incitatus
AMB1996
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,510
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.06, S: 5.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: August 02, 2022, 07:36:04 PM »

I doubt it. I still think Warren losing Bristol in 2018 had more to do with Baker being on the ballot.

It was also a product of Diehl's home-field advantage and Warren being the least popular elected official in the state.

By the way, I realize now I meant Plymouth, not Bristol in my original post.

But anyway, I don't expect his home turf advantage to help him much here this time around.

I'd think it would help more; local issues are more significant in state elections than in national elections.

Look at the maps for the other candidates in 2018; Orrall carried her House district and almost nowhere else and Brady, though she admittedly was closer than the rest of the Republican ticket everywhere, ran much closer than her running mates in Concord and Middlesex generally.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2018_Massachusetts_elections
Logged
MarkD
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,192
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: August 03, 2022, 09:31:40 AM »

I think Diehl will narrowly carry Worcester County, in addition to carrying Plymouth by a slightly wider margin than he did in 2018. But that's all. I predict the vote share that Healey and Diehl get will be about 57% to 41%.
Logged
Duke of York
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,961


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: August 03, 2022, 10:02:56 AM »

I think Diehl will narrowly carry Worcester County, in addition to carrying Plymouth by a slightly wider margin than he did in 2018. But that's all. I predict the vote share that Healey and Diehl get will be about 57% to 41%.

Plymouth I can see Diehl winning. Worcester no way.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.221 seconds with 12 queries.