What if Tilden Won in 1876
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 02:24:28 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  Past Election What-ifs (US) (Moderator: Dereich)
  What if Tilden Won in 1876
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: What if Tilden Won in 1876  (Read 565 times)
@Nord_Fulbright
Charles_bagel
Rookie
**
Posts: 20
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.03, S: 3.04

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: August 06, 2020, 06:57:08 AM »

Would the south be Republican or go the path in irl. Would Reconstruction end or Would it not
Logged
𝕭𝖆𝖕𝖙𝖎𝖘𝖙𝖆 𝕸𝖎𝖓𝖔𝖑𝖆
Battista Minola 1616
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,361
Vatican City State


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -1.57

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: August 06, 2020, 07:31:32 AM »
« Edited: August 06, 2020, 07:40:45 AM by Battista Minola 1616 »

Hahahahahahaha imagine thinking that Tilden would not end Reconstruction.



Seriously, the South would have gone how it did in real life except quicker and with much more ease.
Logged
Alben Barkley
KYWildman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,301
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.97, S: -5.74

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: August 06, 2020, 03:23:10 PM »

Tilden did win. You mean if he had been allowed to take office?

Well, things probably don't change that much. Tilden was a moderate Democrat for the time (in a similar mold to Cleveland, also Governor of New York) but probably would have still ended Reconstruction. Considering the reason he wasn't allowed to take office despite winning the election was that the Democrats had made a deal with the Republicans to end Reconstruction in exchange for installing Hayes, the pressure would certainly have been on Tilden had he been president to end Reconstruction, even if he didn't personally want to. (And all indications are he wasn't too concerned about it.)

The biggest difference is that without their corrupt bargain which stabbed black Americans in the back and disowned everything they had claimed to believe, the image of the Republican Party might not have been tarnished so quickly. Had it been a Democrat who ended Reconstruction rather than a Republican who did it as part of a deal to outright steal an election, that would have more neatly fit with the narrative of the Republicans as the "good guys" and the Democrats as the "bad guys" on civil rights.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,681
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: August 09, 2020, 12:25:36 PM »

It doesnt matter because Jim Crow was already established in the South

Morrison Waite replaced Samuel P Chase and was less likely to interfere in Jim Crow and he was appointed by Grant
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 13 queries.