PPP: Biden +13 in CO, +11 in ME, +3 in NC, +1 in GA
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 28, 2024, 06:31:40 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  PPP: Biden +13 in CO, +11 in ME, +3 in NC, +1 in GA
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: PPP: Biden +13 in CO, +11 in ME, +3 in NC, +1 in GA  (Read 2568 times)
Progressive Pessimist
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,547
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.71, S: -7.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: July 29, 2020, 06:36:49 PM »

Iowa seems to want to become the new Florida.

Actually, that's not entirely fair. If it stubbornly gives Trump a narrow win while also electing Greenfield then I can forgive them more than Florida in 2018.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 87,759
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: July 29, 2020, 07:00:39 PM »

CO host voting 13 points for Biden and NC is tied and Cunningham is up 12 and Kelly is only up 2.
Logged
Co-Chair Bagel23
Bagel23
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,369
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.48, S: -1.83

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: July 30, 2020, 10:14:53 PM »

Good for Trump
Logged
Fusternino
Rookie
**
Posts: 183
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: July 31, 2020, 10:03:26 PM »

I live in NC. The cities are all very suburban and the Democratic organizational strength is already maxed out-it's the anti-Florida. There's not much room to grow here.
Logged
Storr
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,094
Moldova, Republic of


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: July 31, 2020, 10:15:02 PM »

I live in NC. The cities are all very suburban and the Democratic organizational strength is already maxed out-it's the anti-Florida. There's not much room to grow here.
Are you saying Florida cities aren't suburban?
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 87,759
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: July 31, 2020, 10:15:11 PM »

When QU comes out with its LV screen after Labor Day and poll right CO, it will be Hickenlooper 46 Gardner 42 not Biden plus 13 in FL, it will be Trump 46, Biden 45 in FL
Logged
RussFeingoldWasRobbed
Progress96
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,237
United States


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -6.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: August 01, 2020, 12:30:11 AM »

Even before the pandemic, I would have believed the Democratic candidate would have a decent chance at winning CO by double digits.
And yes, CO will vote to the left of VA.

Hillary was a terrible candidate for poor Hispanic WC Southern Colorado. Biden should do better there and similar areas like NM, NV, and South Texas.
I dont know about South Texas, but southern CO isn't going to be viable for democrats in the long run regardless of what candidates they run. Biden will do better then Hillary sure and he is a better fit but it's mainly because it's a d wave year.
Logged
NOVA Green
Oregon Progressive
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,417
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: August 01, 2020, 03:40:28 AM »

Even before the pandemic, I would have believed the Democratic candidate would have a decent chance at winning CO by double digits.
And yes, CO will vote to the left of VA.

Hillary was a terrible candidate for poor Hispanic WC Southern Colorado. Biden should do better there and similar areas like NM, NV, and South Texas.
I dont know about South Texas, but southern CO isn't going to be viable for democrats in the long run regardless of what candidates they run. Biden will do better then Hillary sure and he is a better fit but it's mainly because it's a d wave year.

Southern CO?

Assuming we are basically talking Pueblo County.... 78.6k TV?

Sure we could talk about places like Conejos and Alamosa County (Which are both majority Latino in POP)... Still tiny counties with extremely marginal CO vote share...

Don't subscribe to the CO Latino narrative presented, since really votes are gonna be much heavier in Adams County than some small rural "Old Spanish" Counties...

Similar bag in NM where you got the "Old Spanish" and also the "Mexican American" POP floating around...

Once we start talking NV and TX, Latino voting populations start to shift dramatically... becomes more a TO game and margins between working-class Latinos vs Middle Class Latinos...

Either way, just like in business would happily accept increased TV Raw Vote Total Margins vs % profit margins...

Made many posts previously regarding working class Latino voting patterns in Tejas (and elsewhere) vs middle class Latinos....
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.031 seconds with 12 queries.