Opinion on the frequency of the term "Marxist" nowadays (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 11:30:51 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Forum Community
  Forum Community (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, YE, KoopaDaQuick 🇵🇸)
  Opinion on the frequency of the term "Marxist" nowadays (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: title
#1
FF
 
#2
HF
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 36

Author Topic: Opinion on the frequency of the term "Marxist" nowadays  (Read 766 times)
Middle-aged Europe
Old Europe
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,222
Ukraine


« on: July 26, 2020, 02:53:20 PM »

Meh... you mean the way it is increasingly applied by Trumpists to anyone who protests against police violence or racism as some form of all-purpose, but ultimately pretty unspecified, boogeyman description in order to avoid actually discussing police violence or racism?

Pretty moronic, I'd say. And annoying, which is maybe even the point: "to troll the libs".



As for the term "Marxist" itself irrespective of the recent political instrumentalization by the American Right: Seems to cover a pretty broad spectrum and therefore it really necessitates further specification which branch of Marxism a Marxist belongs to in order to carry any true meaning. Joseph Stalin was a Marxist. So were Theodor Adorno and the Frankfurt School. So were Jean-Paul Sartre, Bertolt Brecht, and Pier Paolo Pasolini. So were a huge chunk of the leaders of the Bauhaus. Mother Theresa was Catholic... so was Timothy McVeigh.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 14 queries.