Change Research/CNBC: Kelly +7%, Peters +7%, Cunningham +7%
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 06:05:18 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 Senate & House Election Polls
  Change Research/CNBC: Kelly +7%, Peters +7%, Cunningham +7%
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Change Research/CNBC: Kelly +7%, Peters +7%, Cunningham +7%  (Read 538 times)
TiltsAreUnderrated
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,776


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: July 15, 2020, 04:58:08 AM »

https://www.changeresearch.com/post/states-of-play-battleground-wave-9

July 10-12, 2020

Battleground states (AZ/FL/MI/NC/PA/WI) sample: 4332 likely voters (exact sample sizes also given for individual states)
MoE: 1.49% for battleground sample 

AZ:
345 likely voters
Kelly 52%
McSally 45%
Would not vote 1%
Not sure 2%

MI:
824 likely voters
Peters 50%
Peters 43%
Would not vote 1%
Not sure 5%

NC:
655 likely voters
Cunningham 49%
Tillis 42%
Would not vote 2%
Not sure 7%
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,847
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: July 15, 2020, 05:08:04 AM »

Who did these polls, Herman Cain?
Logged
TiltsAreUnderrated
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,776


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: July 15, 2020, 05:17:14 AM »

Changes on the margins in the last Change Research/CNBC poll (June 26-28, 2020):

AZ: Kelly -2% (Biden -1%)
MI: Peters +0% (Biden +1%)
NC: Cunningham -3% (Biden -6%)
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,221


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: July 15, 2020, 05:17:33 AM »


I mean, they're not really off? Cunningham is more than what we've seen, but Change also had him high last time as well IRC
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,708
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: July 15, 2020, 06:38:55 AM »

With AZ, CO, ME, NC this gives Ds 50 seats, IA we dont know about and GA will go to a runoff
Logged
MillennialModerate
MillennialMAModerate
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,016
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: July 15, 2020, 11:38:16 AM »

With AZ, CO, ME, NC this gives Ds 50 seats, IA we dont know about and GA will go to a runoff

You’re off here.

Georgia is not happening. It’s a pipe dream. Montana is probably going to be won by Daines but it’s a pure tossup and I wouldn’t be shocked if Bullock pulled it out. Georgia on the other hand I think is the most overhyped state on this forum
Logged
ProgressiveModerate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,739


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: July 15, 2020, 11:40:45 AM »

With AZ, CO, ME, NC this gives Ds 50 seats, IA we dont know about and GA will go to a runoff

You’re off here.

Georgia is not happening. It’s a pipe dream. Montana is probably going to be won by Daines but it’s a pure tossup and I wouldn’t be shocked if Bullock pulled it out. Georgia on the other hand I think is the most overhyped state on this forum

If it's pure tossup shouldn't they both Bullock and Daines have 50-50 chance of winning? That's like saying Biden is likely to win VA but Trump still has a chnace to eek out a win, so therefore it's tossup.
Logged
WD
Western Democrat
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,577
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -7.35, S: -0.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: July 15, 2020, 11:43:30 AM »

With AZ, CO, ME, NC this gives Ds 50 seats, IA we dont know about and GA will go to a runoff

You’re off here.

Georgia is not happening. It’s a pipe dream. Montana is probably going to be won by Daines but it’s a pure tossup and I wouldn’t be shocked if Bullock pulled it out. Georgia on the other hand I think is the most overhyped state on this forum

You should go work for Charlie Cook.
Logged
tagimaucia
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 570


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: July 15, 2020, 11:54:54 AM »

With AZ, CO, ME, NC this gives Ds 50 seats, IA we dont know about and GA will go to a runoff

You’re off here.

Georgia is not happening. It’s a pipe dream. Montana is probably going to be won by Daines but it’s a pure tossup and I wouldn’t be shocked if Bullock pulled it out. Georgia on the other hand I think is the most overhyped state on this forum

I mean, back of the envelope math says that Abrams would have tied or slightly edged Kemp with presidential-year level turnout (while turnout was very high for a midterm, youth turnout was still not nearly as good as 2016/2012/etc.). 

Add to that the fact that Trump and republicans generally are currently several points less popular than they were in November of 2018, I don't know how anyone could make this statement with any confidence.  And I doubt that Perdue gets a boost of anything more than a point or so for incumbency with how polarized federal elections are now. The runoff system makes it a bigger lift, but if I could put even money on the Democratic GA senate candidates vs. the Republican GA senate candidates getting more total votes on election day, I'd put it on the Democrats right now.
Logged
Storr
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,227
Moldova, Republic of


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: July 15, 2020, 06:30:10 PM »

They polled only 345 people in Arizona, is this a joke?
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,708
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: July 15, 2020, 08:14:40 PM »

AZ and NC and IA can split their votes for Prez and Senate. AZ did in 2018 and Sinema won by 2
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.219 seconds with 13 queries.