Lol I don’t know how from an objective point of view Carter can be ranked in the top half , doing so is as partisan as republicans rankling Hoover , W Bush or Trump in the top half of their lists .
Same with Reagan I don’t know how objectively he can count in the bottom half lol , doing so is again as lol if Republicans did that with FDR (which I tend to criticize them for too ).
These lists should not be done on how much you agree with what they did but how effective they were as presidents and the problem with Atlas on this(for both sides) is they tend to rank on ideological agreement with a president or whether or How they liked a presidency rather than how effective they are .
We aren't presidential historians lol. We're just random political junkies on a political forum. Deal with it!
