IA - GQR Research/End Citizens United (partisan): Greenfield +2%
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 28, 2024, 05:22:06 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 Senate & House Election Polls
  IA - GQR Research/End Citizens United (partisan): Greenfield +2%
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: IA - GQR Research/End Citizens United (partisan): Greenfield +2%  (Read 2931 times)
TiltsAreUnderrated
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,771


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: July 06, 2020, 02:08:05 PM »

https://www.thegazette.com/subject/news/government/joni-ernst-launches-first-tv-ad-as-another-poll-shows-tight-iowa-senate-race-20200706

GQR Research/End Citizens United (released in the Gazette)
June 23-28, 2020
800 likely voters
MoE: 3.46%

Greenfield 49%
Ernst 47%

Logged
WD
Western Democrat
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,573
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -7.35, S: -0.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: July 06, 2020, 02:09:31 PM »

Tossup/ Tilt D.

I predict Greenfield by 50-49 and Trump by 51-48
Logged
Astatine
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,877


Political Matrix
E: -0.72, S: -5.90

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: July 06, 2020, 02:09:55 PM »

Wow, this is the fourth poll in a row now showing Ernst behind.
Logged
TrendsareUsuallyReal
TrendsareReal
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,098
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: July 06, 2020, 02:13:15 PM »

Yet another reminder, beware Iowa’s recent polling history.
Logged
WD
Western Democrat
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,573
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -7.35, S: -0.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: July 06, 2020, 02:16:19 PM »

Yet another reminder, beware Iowa’s recent polling history.

Yeah but Ernst is by no means safe, she’s not even the favorite, I could see this being within 1-2 points either way. Probably seat 52/53 for the Dems
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,758


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: July 06, 2020, 02:19:38 PM »

Ernst gave the tell-tale sign the other day when she was asked about polls and said "she doesn't follow the polls etc." She's losing and she knows it.

I would bet that Greenfield ends up winning by 1-2.
Logged
SnowLabrador
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,577
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: July 06, 2020, 02:30:14 PM »

Iowa polls underestimate Republicans. Lean R.
Logged
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,284
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: July 06, 2020, 02:57:18 PM »

They probably didn’t poll the people who talked to/listened to/hugged/etc. Ernst on one of her many 99-county tours. With Ernst's retail politics and IA's recent polling history -> Lean R.
Logged
Left Wing
FalterinArc
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,512
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -8.26, S: -6.09


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: July 06, 2020, 03:00:36 PM »

Remember like two months ago when everyone on this forum thought that Ernst would win by 20 points?
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 87,793
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: July 06, 2020, 03:08:13 PM »

They probably didn’t poll the people who talked to/listened to/hugged/etc. Ernst on one of her many 99-county tours. With Ernst's retail politics and IA's recent polling history -> Lean R.

No
Logged
Gracile
gracile
Moderators
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,043


Political Matrix
E: -8.00, S: -7.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: July 06, 2020, 03:12:58 PM »

Remember like two months ago when everyone on this forum thought that Ernst would win by 20 points?

Nobody thought this, lol.
Logged
TrendsareUsuallyReal
TrendsareReal
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,098
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: July 06, 2020, 03:16:50 PM »

Remember like two months ago when everyone on this forum thought that Ernst would win by 20 points?

Nobody thought this, lol.

I thought a lot of people thought it was Safe R ad that Ernst would do better than Trump. Last month is when the perception started or turn
Logged
Left Wing
FalterinArc
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,512
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -8.26, S: -6.09


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: July 06, 2020, 03:17:31 PM »

Remember like two months ago when everyone on this forum thought that Ernst would win by 20 points?

Nobody thought this, lol.
https://talkelections.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=370793.msg7315024#msg7315024
Logged
Gracile
gracile
Moderators
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,043


Political Matrix
E: -8.00, S: -7.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: July 06, 2020, 03:19:16 PM »


One user who is notorious for being a concern troll/doomsayer on Democrats' chances is not everyone on this forum.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 87,793
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: July 06, 2020, 03:27:27 PM »
« Edited: July 06, 2020, 03:30:41 PM by MR. CORY BOOKER »

Trolling is telling the truth that it's not gonna be a 400 to 500 EC landslide and 12 Senate seats.

Ds didnt even get that in 2008 400 EC votes and win TX and that was D plus 6

Covid 19 wasn't Trump's fault. It takes both parties to find a vaccine and Biden can be blamed if he doesn't find a vaccine in 2021 and Rs take Congress back in 2022

Just like the Rs blamed Ds in 2010 and won 60 House seats with 10 percent unemployment
Logged
Left Wing
FalterinArc
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,512
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -8.26, S: -6.09


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: July 06, 2020, 04:35:19 PM »


One user who is notorious for being a concern troll/doomsayer on Democrats' chances is not everyone on this forum.
Read the whole thread. The majority of people said it was likely to safe R.
Logged
Astatine
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,877


Political Matrix
E: -0.72, S: -5.90

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: July 06, 2020, 04:37:29 PM »


One user who is notorious for being a concern troll/doomsayer on Democrats' chances is not everyone on this forum.
It should still be noted that several other users saw the race as Likely R bordering Safe R. So while the 20 point lead was an exaggeration, there was still a wide consensus that this race is hardly competitive.
Logged
YE
Modadmin
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,645


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: -0.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: July 06, 2020, 04:49:48 PM »

1. I don’t trust polling in the state.
2. I’m not sure why Greenfield would outrun Biden here.
3. I think Trump narrowly wins Iowa.

While recent polling would normally suggest Lean D, I’m leaving this at Lean R for the above reasons.
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,758


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: July 06, 2020, 05:19:59 PM »

1. I don’t trust polling in the state.
2. I’m not sure why Greenfield would outrun Biden here.
3. I think Trump narrowly wins Iowa.

While recent polling would normally suggest Lean D, I’m leaving this at Lean R for the above reasons.

because Ernst is a bad candidate?
Logged
YE
Modadmin
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,645


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: -0.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: July 06, 2020, 05:27:27 PM »

1. I don’t trust polling in the state.
2. I’m not sure why Greenfield would outrun Biden here.
3. I think Trump narrowly wins Iowa.

While recent polling would normally suggest Lean D, I’m leaving this at Lean R for the above reasons.

because Ernst is a bad candidate?

In this environment, basically everyone, including Trump, is a bad candidate generally speaking.

Why would someone vote Trump/Greenfield?
Logged
TrendsareUsuallyReal
TrendsareReal
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,098
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: July 06, 2020, 05:27:42 PM »

1. I don’t trust polling in the state.
2. I’m not sure why Greenfield would outrun Biden here.
3. I think Trump narrowly wins Iowa.

While recent polling would normally suggest Lean D, I’m leaving this at Lean R for the above reasons.

because Ernst is a bad candidate?

Why is Ernst a bad candidate? Her campaign in 2014 was one of the best of the cycle
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,758


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: July 06, 2020, 05:30:17 PM »

1. I don’t trust polling in the state.
2. I’m not sure why Greenfield would outrun Biden here.
3. I think Trump narrowly wins Iowa.

While recent polling would normally suggest Lean D, I’m leaving this at Lean R for the above reasons.

because Ernst is a bad candidate?

Why is Ernst a bad candidate? Her campaign in 2014 was one of the best of the cycle

2020 is not 2014. Iowa seems like AZ in the sense that they like their candidates to be independents / mavericks in a way. Ernst has been nothing but a Trump hack.
Logged
WD
Western Democrat
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,573
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -7.35, S: -0.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: July 06, 2020, 05:32:15 PM »

1. I don’t trust polling in the state.
2. I’m not sure why Greenfield would outrun Biden here.
3. I think Trump narrowly wins Iowa.

While recent polling would normally suggest Lean D, I’m leaving this at Lean R for the above reasons.

because Ernst is a bad candidate?

In this environment, basically everyone, including Trump, is a bad candidate generally speaking.

Why would someone vote Trump/Greenfield?

Beacuse they like Trump and Greenfield as canidates? Most Voters don’t care about policy. How else do you explain all the Trump-Baldwin voters in WI or the Trump-Gianforte-Tester voters in MT.
Logged
South Dakota Democrat
jrk26
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,394


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: July 07, 2020, 01:17:09 AM »

1. I don’t trust polling in the state.
2. I’m not sure why Greenfield would outrun Biden here.
3. I think Trump narrowly wins Iowa.

While recent polling would normally suggest Lean D, I’m leaving this at Lean R for the above reasons.

because Ernst is a bad candidate?

Why is Ernst a bad candidate? Her campaign in 2014 was one of the best of the cycle

2020 is not 2014. Iowa seems like AZ in the sense that they like their candidates to be independents / mavericks in a way. Ernst has been nothing but a Trump hack.

Chuck Grassley says hello.

(I'm not disputing that Ernst is in trouble.  I just think the notion that Iowa likes their candidates to be a maverick is not remotely true.)
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 87,793
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: July 07, 2020, 04:28:46 AM »

1. I don’t trust polling in the state.
2. I’m not sure why Greenfield would outrun Biden here.
3. I think Trump narrowly wins Iowa.

While recent polling would normally suggest Lean D, I’m leaving this at Lean R for the above reasons.

because Ernst is a bad candidate?

Why is Ernst a bad candidate? Her campaign in 2014 was one of the best of the cycle

2014 was a Gov race Kim Reynolds hadnt signed the abortion ban. Reynolds was much more popular than she was now. She could very well lose to JD Scholten in 2022 if Scholten loses his race for IA 4.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.057 seconds with 13 queries.