2020: The nations all agreed to unite and become states under a united single country.
The nations all agreed to run democratic elections for world president.
They decided to run Joe Biden of Washington (Yes, Washington is the new name for the US I picked in this scenario) for the Capitalist Party and Xi Jinping of China for the Socialism Workers Party.
Important State Results
Washington: 91-6% Biden
Canada: 72-26% Biden
Mexico: 57-42% Biden
Brazil: 63-35% Biden
Nigeria: 54-44% Biden
Egypt: 52-47% Jinping
India: 52-47% Biden
Pakistan: 58-40% Jinping
China: 93-4% Jinping
Germany: 65-34% Biden
France: 69-30% Biden
UK: 74-23% Biden
Poland: 76-22% Biden
Russia: 67-32% Jinping
Turkey: 59-40% Jinping
DR Congo: 51-48% Jinping
Australia: 66-32% Biden
Japan: 61-38% Biden
New Zealand: 63-34% Biden
OVERALL RESULTS
Biden 51%
Jinping 48%
I think you're overestimating the number of close to evenly divided countries there would be. In the first election there would still be a lot of strong national East/West identities. Australia for example I would predict goes 90% for Biden in a Biden-Xi matchup.
1. Xi Jinping's surname is not Jinping, it's Xi.
2. You greatly overestimate western influence globally. If any such election were held, the U.S./Canada/Western Europe/Australia/NZ faction would form a minority political party on the level of say 20% that would lose every time. Part due to low birth rates (a majority of the world's population live in south and east Asia) and part due to the rest of the world just hates their worldview, see things like the Non-Aligned Movement and the G77.
3. There'd be no Biden in such a scenario.
4. Why would we be renamed?
5. Your list of important countries show you haven't really grasped what you're talking about. You include New Zealand as important but don't include Indonesia. New Zealand has 5 million people. Electorally, it would have less influence than Indiana. Indonesia has 270 million people, it's the 4th-largest country in the world population wise and will one day pass the U.S. for 3rd.
6. Theoretical political parties in such an event:
-a "non-aligned" strong state no butting into other states' affairs group, led by the Chinese and Russians - this group effectively runs the UN now
-a Western European/North American "spread democracy" group
-a black African nationalist group, believe in very strong centralized leadership
-a Muslim theocratic group
-feel there'd be some communal Asian group that would be more Japanese/Korean in character, problem is the rest of east Asia hates Japan, but some also hate the Chinese...central and east Asia is hard to determine, might be some kind of Indian-led light version of the Western European/North American group
I also agree with almost all of this post.
