Pelosi, Biden say there is a difference between removing Confederate leaders, past presidents (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 01:04:24 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Pelosi, Biden say there is a difference between removing Confederate leaders, past presidents (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Pelosi, Biden say there is a difference between removing Confederate leaders, past presidents  (Read 2634 times)
sparkey
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,103


Political Matrix
E: 6.71, S: -7.30

« on: July 03, 2020, 12:25:54 PM »

What to do with John Tyler then?

I have an idea of where Pelosi would go with him, considering she took down portraits of Speakers of the House who had any connection to the Confederacy, even those who were not mainly known for their Confederate connection.
Logged
sparkey
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,103


Political Matrix
E: 6.71, S: -7.30

« Reply #1 on: July 03, 2020, 02:30:04 PM »

What to do with John Tyler then?

I have an idea of where Pelosi would go with him, considering she took down portraits of Speakers of the House who had any connection to the Confederacy, even those who were not mainly known for their Confederate connection.

Don't forget the one who joined the Confederacy when he was 16 in the 1860s and then became speaker in 1890.
If you're referring to Carlisle, I argue his later loyal service to the US outweighs his Confederate service.  After all, he was 16 when war broke out.

When did Carlisle serve the Confederacy? The Speaker in question is Crisp.
Logged
sparkey
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,103


Political Matrix
E: 6.71, S: -7.30

« Reply #2 on: July 05, 2020, 02:02:49 PM »

It was the rebel scum who didn't like paying taxes to pay for the French and Indian War that George Washington started and which the end result was so beneficial to the colonies that were the traitors, and would have been widely recognized as such had they lost.

Very doubtful. Were the Forty-Eighters just traitors because they lost?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 12 queries.