Change Research - Kelly +9, Peters +7, Cunningham +10 (AZ, MI, NC) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 04:35:22 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 Senate & House Election Polls
  Change Research - Kelly +9, Peters +7, Cunningham +10 (AZ, MI, NC) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Change Research - Kelly +9, Peters +7, Cunningham +10 (AZ, MI, NC)  (Read 1851 times)
Calthrina950
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,936
United States


P P
« on: July 03, 2020, 08:30:48 PM »

Getting back on topic:

I don't know if I buy Cunningham +10 in North Carolina, but things are definitely pointing towards, at worst, a toss-up-typs scenario for him against Tillis.  

I place Arizona in the lean-D category -- McSally losing in 2018 yet being appointed anyway is a rather baffling short-term move by Ducey.  

And I still like Peters in Michigan.  James could get to a point where he makes things close, but he'd need to find that contigent of voters who puts him over the top.  And if Biden is leading the state on Election Night, I'm not sure he'd be able to find that necessary cadre of split-ticket voters. 

Do you think Ducey appointed McSally to the seat to intentionally weaken her so that he could run for the seat in 2022?

That would be a really dumb move on his part, so there's a chance

And now, with his disastrous handling of the coronavirus pandemic, Ducey may have a tough hill to climb against Kelly in 2022, assuming that he does decide to run for the seat.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 13 queries.