The Atlas Asylum of absurd/ignorant posts IX

[Never Made it to Graceland]

It's certainly likely, but only if Biden wins.

Democrats aren't violent in large numbers the way it seems Republicans are.

Hard to believe anyone would post something this stupid considering the amount of looting and rioting the left has done in the last few months.

Tell me one violent rioter/looter who is voting for Biden.

Actually I know of one, one of my instagram friends went and took part in the rioting in LA and will definitely vote for Biden. Who do you think the BLM rioters will vote for, Trump.

I'll say they'll vote for Hawkins, especially if they are indeed Antifa anarchist socialists.

I know your religion is centrism but, Jesus. You took Fuzzy's stupid point about Biden supporters and made it a stupid point about another candidate's supporters. It's incredibly pointless to speculate about how the bogeyman for fox news viewers is going to vote.

His religion isn't centrism, it is Authoritarian centrism.

I stand corrected.

[Progressive Pessimist]

The fact that 44% of Americans want 4 more years of this absolute hell is simply astounding.

It is, but it's the country we're living in. I've grown to accept it and be numb to it. I always thought  that 44% is actually a very realistic popular vote percentage for Trump performing at his worst. He shouldn't even be getting 1% in polls ever, but alas, to quote his apathetic ass: "it is what it is."

Yes I know many of you will not find anything absurd or ignorant with that post, but I don't care.

I know you don't care but what's your reasoning for this? I don't really get it, obviously.

[𝕭𝖆𝖕𝖙𝖎𝖘𝖙𝖆 𝕸𝖎𝖓𝖔𝖑𝖆]

The fact that 44% of Americans want 4 more years of this absolute hell is simply astounding.

It is, but it's the country we're living in. I've grown to accept it and be numb to it. I always thought  that 44% is actually a very realistic popular vote percentage for Trump performing at his worst. He shouldn't even be getting 1% in polls ever, but alas, to quote his apathetic ass: "it is what it is."

Yes I know many of you will not find anything absurd or ignorant with that post, but I don't care.

I know you don't care but what's your reasoning for this? I don't really get it, obviously.

I think it's pretty gross to suggest that the Republican candidate in a situation like this *should* be getting zero support.
I posted that here mainly to vent my contrarianism about it without having to actually write anything substantial.
I understand that you are much more angry, nihilistic and pessimistic about the current status of the USA than I am, so we'll have to agree to disagree.

[WD]

The fact that 44% of Americans want 4 more years of this absolute hell is simply astounding.

It is, but it's the country we're living in. I've grown to accept it and be numb to it. I always thought  that 44% is actually a very realistic popular vote percentage for Trump performing at his worst. He shouldn't even be getting 1% in polls ever, but alas, to quote his apathetic ass: "it is what it is."

Yes I know many of you will not find anything absurd or ignorant with that post, but I don't care.

I know you don't care but what's your reasoning for this? I don't really get it, obviously.

I think it's pretty gross to suggest that the Republican candidate in a situation like this *should* be getting zero support.
I posted that here mainly to vent my contrarianism about it without having to actually write anything substantial.
I understand that you are much more angry, nihilistic and pessimistic about the current status of the USA than I am, so we'll have to agree to disagree.

Could you clarify why you think its “gross”. Imo theirs nothing gross about disliking a political party.

[𝕭𝖆𝖕𝖙𝖎𝖘𝖙𝖆 𝕸𝖎𝖓𝖔𝖑𝖆]

The fact that 44% of Americans want 4 more years of this absolute hell is simply astounding.

It is, but it's the country we're living in. I've grown to accept it and be numb to it. I always thought  that 44% is actually a very realistic popular vote percentage for Trump performing at his worst. He shouldn't even be getting 1% in polls ever, but alas, to quote his apathetic ass: "it is what it is."

Yes I know many of you will not find anything absurd or ignorant with that post, but I don't care.

I know you don't care but what's your reasoning for this? I don't really get it, obviously.

I think it's pretty gross to suggest that the Republican candidate in a situation like this *should* be getting zero support.
I posted that here mainly to vent my contrarianism about it without having to actually write anything substantial.
I understand that you are much more angry, nihilistic and pessimistic about the current status of the USA than I am, so we'll have to agree to disagree.

Could you clarify why you think its “gross”. Imo theirs nothing gross about disliking a political party.

Disliking a political party is not the same as arguing that the party deserves zero votes.
I think it's a question of tone used.

[Never Made it to Graceland]

I don't know what to make of this Jessica character. Casual transphobia ain't cool. But maybe just a joke in bad taste. Either way, not a good post.

Biden signals Al Gore is the pick:
https://twitter.com/joebiden/status/1292475731172261894?s=21

When did Gore become a woman?

Well, the way things are going on the left it wouldn't surprise me. She would probably be a better vice president then most of the choices within my opinion. lol

[Progressive Pessimist]

The fact that 44% of Americans want 4 more years of this absolute hell is simply astounding.

It is, but it's the country we're living in. I've grown to accept it and be numb to it. I always thought  that 44% is actually a very realistic popular vote percentage for Trump performing at his worst. He shouldn't even be getting 1% in polls ever, but alas, to quote his apathetic ass: "it is what it is."

Yes I know many of you will not find anything absurd or ignorant with that post, but I don't care.

I know you don't care but what's your reasoning for this? I don't really get it, obviously.

I think it's pretty gross to suggest that the Republican candidate in a situation like this *should* be getting zero support.
I posted that here mainly to vent my contrarianism about it without having to actually write anything substantial.
I understand that you are much more angry, nihilistic and pessimistic about the current status of the USA than I am, so we'll have to agree to disagree.

I just want to live in a world where people could see through Trump's bulls***, it isn't so much a Republican thing as it is a Trump thing. It's maddening. But okay, at least I understand now.

[cinyc]

Who is Jim Trex, and why is this thread named after him? In fact, why is this thread named after anybody? That's not nice.

[Fuzzy Bear]

Who is Jim Trex, and why is this thread named after him? In fact, why is this thread named after anybody? That's not nice.

This is a thread where the Atlas Left (for the most part) gets to post ad hominem attacks against people they disagree with without being sanctioned.

[Chancellor Tanterterg]

Who care? This is straight ignorance of LGBT culture at best and homophobic at worst. I'm getting real sick of the puritanical socon BS coming from liberals lately. I guess this is what happens when you swallow the suburbs!

What many straights (and apparently some teenage gay Atlas virgins/incels) don't seem to get that when there is literally less than 5% of the selection available to gay men that is available to heterosexual/bisexual men & women, there's going to be a naturally higher tolerance for age differences in relationships and sex (or else many would just end up being celibate; we're not all attracted to each other, you know).

A guy in his late 20s bangs some guys in their early 20s: that's a Wednesday night in Gay America. An insane number of gay relationships have a decade or more of difference in them. The overwhelming share of my own partners have been a few years older than I (a trend that has stuck from the time I was a teenager until now, despite it being unintentional on my own part), but it's just how things work out; these are my preferences. It doesn't make my relationships "inappropriate", it doesn't make me a "victim" and I highly doubt any of his partners could be considered such, either.


Furthermore and with regard to "muh power structures and student/teachers":

1) When did these events happen? I'm doubting they happened this year.

2) Are these "students" actually his students or just happened to be on the same campus that he taught at (along with 28,000 other "students" at UMass Amherst)? I imagine had he had sex with college students from a university halfway across the country, the headlines would be the same ("'teacher' banging 'students'!").

3) How long has he been a teacher on-campus? As far as we know, he was 25 and banging 21 year-olds before he was even a teacher there. This is a guy who got elected Mayor when he was 22 years old: I'm sure even had it not been students, some of the usual suspects would've been telling him back then that having intimate relationships with people of his own age and gender would have been "inappropriate" for somebody "of his position".

Nobody can claim "POWER STRUCTURE" nonsense if the "students" weren't students of his - and even then and from the sound of it, this was a voluntary, consensual, mutual matching of individuals that was initiated off-campus/on a dating app. If he was banging children or coercing his own students in-person without mutual interest expressed prior, then it's "inappropriate". Otherwise, it's just relying upon most people's ignorance by using buzzwords to paint a portrait largely rooted in the female-centric objectified sexual victim mentality, to which gay men obviously aren't bound.

[T'Chenka]

Who is Jim Trex, and why is this thread named after him? In fact, why is this thread named after anybody? That's not nice.

Jim R Tex is a blue avatar poster who inexplicably changed personality earlier this year and began posting (IMO) unreasonable unhinged nonsense out of the blue. He could now be most accurately described as The Rudy Guliani Of Atlas (modern day Guliani).

[cinyc]

Who is Jim Trex, and why is this thread named after him? In fact, why is this thread named after anybody? That's not nice.

Jim R Tex is a blue avatar poster who inexplicably changed personality earlier this year and began posting (IMO) unreasonable unhinged nonsense out of the blue. He could now be most accurately described as The Rudy Guliani Of Atlas (modern day Guliani).

jimrtex is one of the best posters on this forum, who contributes substantive, real world stuff most of the time. He is entitled to his opinions, as "wrong" as you may think them.

Like I said on another thread, it's a travesty that this thread is named after anyone. That's a personal attack, which is against the ToS.

[SevenEleven]

Who is Jim Trex, and why is this thread named after him? In fact, why is this thread named after anybody? That's not nice.

I agree 100%. It wasn't right when it was named after BlueSwan and it's not right to be named after anyone else either.

[T'Chenka]

Snowflakery. Though there is merit to it I suppose.

[NewYorkExpress]

Who is Jim Trex, and why is this thread named after him? In fact, why is this thread named after anybody? That's not nice.

Jim R Tex is a blue avatar poster who inexplicably changed personality earlier this year and began posting (IMO) unreasonable unhinged nonsense out of the blue. He could now be most accurately described as The Rudy Guliani Of Atlas (modern day Guliani).

jimrtex is one of the best posters on this forum, who contributes substantive, real world stuff most of the time. He is entitled to his opinions, as "wrong" as you may think them.

Like I said on another thread, it's a travesty that this thread is named after anyone. That's a personal attack, which is against the ToS.

I'd be fine with the thread being named after a banned poster like Coraxion, Sanchez or Reaganfan (once the bans on the latter two become official). I'd argue if that happens then there's no real argument for "personal attack".

[7,052,770]

They're part of his BASE.  They're Joe Biden voters (if they show up).  They're the part of Biden's base that Biden doesn't want to claim.

Very nice of Fuzzy to post directly on to the thread for maximum convenience.

Just for the record, I have a new reported post today, and it is likely this one. Fuzzy, or possibly one of his devoted cultists, reported this.

[NewYorkExpress]

They're part of his BASE.  They're Joe Biden voters (if they show up).  They're the part of Biden's base that Biden doesn't want to claim.

Very nice of Fuzzy to post directly on to the thread for maximum convenience.

Just for the record, I have a new reported post today, and it is likely this one. Fuzzy, or possibly one of his devoted cultists, reported this.

It really is long past time to permamute Fuzzy (or at least for us to start reporting everything he posts, since that's basically what he's doing to us.)

[Calthrina950]

They're part of his BASE.  They're Joe Biden voters (if they show up).  They're the part of Biden's base that Biden doesn't want to claim.

Very nice of Fuzzy to post directly on to the thread for maximum convenience.

Just for the record, I have a new reported post today, and it is likely this one. Fuzzy, or possibly one of his devoted cultists, reported this.

It really is long past time to permamute Fuzzy (or at least for us to start reporting everything he posts, since that's basically what he's doing to us.)

What has Fuzzy Bear done to warrant being banned?

[Mr. Morden]

I would encourage you to name the thread after me.  It wouldn't be a personal attack, since all my posts are amazing, and therefore everyone would recognize the name as being ironic rather than serious.

[NewYorkExpress]

They're part of his BASE.  They're Joe Biden voters (if they show up).  They're the part of Biden's base that Biden doesn't want to claim.

Very nice of Fuzzy to post directly on to the thread for maximum convenience.

Just for the record, I have a new reported post today, and it is likely this one. Fuzzy, or possibly one of his devoted cultists, reported this.

It really is long past time to permamute Fuzzy (or at least for us to start reporting everything he posts, since that's basically what he's doing to us.)

What has Fuzzy Bear done to warrant being banned?

Turning everything into a "I'm being persecuted" complex, even when the person being attacked isn't him.

Him being here has done him, and the forum more harm than good.

[Badger]

Who is Jim Trex, and why is this thread named after him? In fact, why is this thread named after anybody? That's not nice.

Jim R Tex is a blue avatar poster who inexplicably changed personality earlier this year and began posting (IMO) unreasonable unhinged nonsense out of the blue. He could now be most accurately described as The Rudy Guliani Of Atlas (modern day Guliani).

Oh, he's been off his rocker a lot longer then earlier this year. Other than that though, a very apt summary.

[Badger]

They're part of his BASE.  They're Joe Biden voters (if they show up).  They're the part of Biden's base that Biden doesn't want to claim.

Very nice of Fuzzy to post directly on to the thread for maximum convenience.

Just for the record, I have a new reported post today, and it is likely this one. Fuzzy, or possibly one of his devoted cultists, reported this.

It really is long past time to permamute Fuzzy (or at least for us to start reporting everything he posts, since that's basically what he's doing to us.)

What has Fuzzy Bear done to warrant being banned?

Turning everything into a "I'm being persecuted" complex, even when the person being attacked isn't him.

Him being here has done him, and the forum more harm than good.

He doesn't need band, but it is starting to get to the point where he possibly needs quarantine kind of like what happened to SN 019 before Banning, or limo liberal. The analogies are apt. Both of those t w i t s consistently spammed and derailed threads ad infinitum with the same utterly repetitive talking points. Fuzzy is almost to the point of doing the same thing.

[S019]

This map is kost likely AZ has now Trump ahead by 1 over Biden

Give it up Ds, AK is safe R

Yeah, McSally winning, while Collins, Tillis, Ernst all lose, just isn't happening, also Iowa voting left of Minnesota, New Mexico, Virginia, North Carolina, and Colorado is well truly something else...

[Never Made it to Graceland]

They're part of his BASE.  They're Joe Biden voters (if they show up).  They're the part of Biden's base that Biden doesn't want to claim.

Very nice of Fuzzy to post directly on to the thread for maximum convenience.

Just for the record, I have a new reported post today, and it is likely this one. Fuzzy, or possibly one of his devoted cultists, reported this.

It really is long past time to permamute Fuzzy (or at least for us to start reporting everything he posts, since that's basically what he's doing to us.)

What has Fuzzy Bear done to warrant being banned?

Turning everything into a "I'm being persecuted" complex, even when the person being attacked isn't him.

Him being here has done him, and the forum more harm than good.

He doesn't need band, but it is starting to get to the point where he possibly needs quarantine kind of like what happened to SN 019 before Banning, or limo liberal. The analogies are apt. Both of those t w i t s consistently spammed and derailed threads ad infinitum with the same utterly repetitive talking points. Fuzzy is almost to the point of doing the same thing.

Agreed. It gets tiring getting the same old refuted "but what about BLM and Marxists" response to any argument.

[MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!]

How the f**k is an absurd posts thread named after Mr. Morden?