The Atlas Asylum of absurd/ignorant posts IX

[It’s so Joever]

Confirmed, this is the suspect
https://twitter.com/karol/status/1462626100643876870?s=20

According to that court record the possible suspect posted his $1,000 cash bond two days ago, on Friday. I wonder why he was in Waukesha if he lives in Milwaukee.

Now that travelling in order to commit violent acts has been legalized, I expect him to be found not guilty by virtue of self defense.

Stop.

I am going to have to disagree with that one, I think telling him to stop was more than justified.

[lfromnj]

Confirmed, this is the suspect
https://twitter.com/karol/status/1462626100643876870?s=20

According to that court record the possible suspect posted his $1,000 cash bond two days ago, on Friday. I wonder why he was in Waukesha if he lives in Milwaukee.

Now that travelling in order to commit violent acts has been legalized, I expect him to be found not guilty by virtue of self defense.

Stop.

I am going to have to disagree with that one, I think telling him to stop was more than justified.

Oh super sorry meant to just quote Crane Husband not you, I even recced your post.

[If my soul was made of stone]

at this point, it seems like the last recourse may be an invasion of Iran, to at least destroy the uranium sites

[Never Made it to Graceland]

Confirmed, this is the suspect
https://twitter.com/karol/status/1462626100643876870?s=20

According to that court record the possible suspect posted his $1,000 cash bond two days ago, on Friday. I wonder why he was in Waukesha if he lives in Milwaukee.

Now that travelling in order to commit violent acts has been legalized, I expect him to be found not guilty by virtue of self defense.

Why ignorant? You creamed your pants on this forum when your hero got off for the murders he committed. What's the difference between that and what this person did at the parade? The skin complexion, obviously. If this was a BLM protest and a white dude drove a Trailblazer into a crowd, you'd be first in line to fête him. Your hypocrisy is so obvious.

[lfromnj]

Confirmed, this is the suspect
https://twitter.com/karol/status/1462626100643876870?s=20

According to that court record the possible suspect posted his $1,000 cash bond two days ago, on Friday. I wonder why he was in Waukesha if he lives in Milwaukee.

Now that travelling in order to commit violent acts has been legalized, I expect him to be found not guilty by virtue of self defense.

Why ignorant? You creamed your pants on this forum when your hero got off for the murders he committed. What's the difference between that and what this person did at the parade? The skin complexion, obviously. If this was a BLM protest and a white dude drove a Trailblazer into a crowd, you'd be first in line to fête him. Your hypocrisy is so obvious.

https://talkelections.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=391753.0

Bullsh**t I gave Reinohl the benefit of the doubt(still not sure what happened here in the end), don't accuse me of being a hack so you can satisfy your absurd analogy.

https://talkelections.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=400031.0

I also defended this person .

[Grumpier Than Uncle Joe]

Let's just check something real quick…





Ah yes, of course.

And.....?

Joe's assertion that Stitt would let the guy have a date with ole sparky simply because he was black was absurd.  Clearer now for you, Badg?

[It’s so Joever]

Let's just check something real quick…





Ah yes, of course.

And.....?

Joe's assertion that Stitt would let the guy have a date with ole sparky simply because he was black was absurd.  Clearer now for you, Badg?

Did he actually assert that?

The post only was a photo of the man in question and the words “of course”. Any other meaning you derive from that is on you.
That was your interpretation, and maybe it was your sudden conclusion because that is what you believe or know is true deep down and just don’t want to admit.

If him being black had nothing to do with it, why did you jump to the conclusion that we were referring to his skin color at all? Maybe we were referring to his gender, or hair. But instead you can conclude was based off skin color, so ask yourself, why did you reach that conclusion?

[Grumpier Than Uncle Joe]

Let's just check something real quick…





Ah yes, of course.

And.....?

Joe's assertion that Stitt would let the guy have a date with ole sparky simply because he was black was absurd.  Clearer now for you, Badg?

Did he actually assert that?

The post only was a photo of the man in question and the words “of course”. Any other meaning you derive from that is on you.
That was your interpretation, and maybe it was your sudden conclusion because that is what you believe or know is true deep down and just don’t want to admit.

If him being black had nothing to do with it, why did you jump to the conclusion that we were referring to his skin color at all? Maybe we were referring to his gender, or hair. But instead you can conclude was based off skin color, so ask yourself, why did you reach that conclusion?

Because I firmly believe that's what Joe meant.

[It’s so Joever]

Let's just check something real quick…





Ah yes, of course.

And.....?

Joe's assertion that Stitt would let the guy have a date with ole sparky simply because he was black was absurd.  Clearer now for you, Badg?

Did he actually assert that?

The post only was a photo of the man in question and the words “of course”. Any other meaning you derive from that is on you.
That was your interpretation, and maybe it was your sudden conclusion because that is what you believe or know is true deep down and just don’t want to admit.

If him being black had nothing to do with it, why did you jump to the conclusion that we were referring to his skin color at all? Maybe we were referring to his gender, or hair. But instead you can conclude was based off skin color, so ask yourself, why did you reach that conclusion?

Because I firmly believe that's what Joe meant.

And why is that?

[Grumpier Than Uncle Joe]

Let's just check something real quick…





Ah yes, of course.

And.....?

Joe's assertion that Stitt would let the guy have a date with ole sparky simply because he was black was absurd.  Clearer now for you, Badg?

Did he actually assert that?

The post only was a photo of the man in question and the words “of course”. Any other meaning you derive from that is on you.
That was your interpretation, and maybe it was your sudden conclusion because that is what you believe or know is true deep down and just don’t want to admit.

If him being black had nothing to do with it, why did you jump to the conclusion that we were referring to his skin color at all? Maybe we were referring to his gender, or hair. But instead you can conclude was based off skin color, so ask yourself, why did you reach that conclusion?

Because I firmly believe that's what Joe meant.

And why is that?

Context of the post.  If Joe didn't mean that he's not shy by any means.  He'll come over here to rip me.

[It’s so Joever]

Let's just check something real quick…





Ah yes, of course.

And.....?

Joe's assertion that Stitt would let the guy have a date with ole sparky simply because he was black was absurd.  Clearer now for you, Badg?

Did he actually assert that?

The post only was a photo of the man in question and the words “of course”. Any other meaning you derive from that is on you.
That was your interpretation, and maybe it was your sudden conclusion because that is what you believe or know is true deep down and just don’t want to admit.

If him being black had nothing to do with it, why did you jump to the conclusion that we were referring to his skin color at all? Maybe we were referring to his gender, or hair. But instead you can conclude was based off skin color, so ask yourself, why did you reach that conclusion?

Because I firmly believe that's what Joe meant.

And why is that?

Context of the post.  If Joe didn't mean that he's not shy by any means.  He'll come over here to rip me.

I’m sorry, I can be very slow, could you explain the context that makes you think that?

[Hammy]

If there is democratic backsliding in the United States, it probably began with the theft of the 2016 Democratic primary.

Amazing that people are still parroting this garbage line, it's as absurd as claiming Russia altered the results in 2016 or that Biden stole 2020.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

None of these charges are going to stick.

The burden of proof is always on the prosecution, and in this case (as with other self-defense cases), the prosecution must prove that the defendant did not fear for their lives. Which means they must somehow manage to prove a negative.

This is really the problem with the self-defense laws to begin with, therefore these guys are going to walk free just as Kyle Rittenhouse did, they will be keynote speakers at CPAC next year, and get fantastic book deals.

It's incredibly sad, but I am in fear for my life like never before and I'm looking into leaving this country for the first time. I'm already sick at my stomach for Ahmad's mother and the rest of his family.

(Posted here instead of the aged content thread because the misunderstanding of self defense laws and the legal basis in all these cases is just laughably awful, like on the level of claiming being banned by a website violates the First Amendment.)

[FT-02 Senator A.F.E. 🇵🇸🤝🇺🇸🤝🇺🇦]

Self-explanatory

I would make the GOP support universal healthcare. I would make the Democrats stop being anti-white.

[OSR stands with Israel]

Republicans are worse than anything they claim about the government of Cuba. Period.

[Hammy]

I don’t fear the return of Trump, but I fear the reaction of the left to his return.  They basically destroyed our Great American Cities in 2020 with their rage and most still haven’t recovered. The summer of  2020 is going to look tame compared to what they’ll unleash next time.

[GM Team Member and Senator WB]

I don’t like Pinochet or Franco, so I don’t see this as an own whatsoever.

Yes, the leftist/communists Pinochet and Franco fought were arguably worse than Pinochet or Franco themselves. That does not in any way turn the two aforementioned authoritarians into heroic figures- rather, it is simply a case of two morally questionable historical figures battling people that were even worse for their country.

[Libertas Vel Mors]

I don’t like Pinochet or Franco, so I don’t see this as an own whatsoever.

Yes, the leftist/communists Pinochet and Franco fought were arguably worse than Pinochet or Franco themselves. That does not in any way turn the two aforementioned authoritarians into heroic figures- rather, it is simply a case of two morally questionable historical figures battling people that were even worse for their country.

You like Pinochet and Franco?

[Sol]

Lots of countries have characteristic bigotries that are weirdly common there. If Britain is TERF Island then it's in the same sense that Japan is Xenophobe Archipelago, India is Misogynist Subcontinent, and France is Islamophobe Hexagon.

🤦🏼‍♂️ 🤦🏼‍♂️ 🤦🏼‍♂️

Not forgetting the whole Middle East with its prevailing anti-Semitism, and certain regions within Germany and the USA where misandrists, anti-white racists, Christophobes, ageists, and taxpayer-hostile losers live.

If racist Nathan crashes into oncoming traffic by playing ghost driver on the freeway, all the other car drivers are at fault to his thinking, of course... 😒

[Anzeigenhauptmeister]

FIFY

Lots of countries have characteristic bigotries that are weirdly common there. If Britain is TERF Island then it's in the same sense that Japan is Xenophobe Archipelago, India is Misogynist Subcontinent, and France is Islamophobe Hexagon.

[Badger]

FIFY

Lots of countries have characteristic bigotries that are weirdly common there. If Britain is TERF Island then it's in the same sense that Japan is Xenophobe Archipelago, India is Misogynist Subcontinent, and France is Islamophobe Hexagon.

 Not sure how this post is wrong, let alone absurd or ignorant.

[Anzeigenhauptmeister]

FIFY

Lots of countries have characteristic bigotries that are weirdly common there. If Britain is TERF Island then it's in the same sense that Japan is Xenophobe Archipelago, India is Misogynist Subcontinent, and France is Islamophobe Hexagon.

Not sure how this post is wrong, let alone absurd or ignorant.

It testifies to sheer ignorance to call a whole country "xenophobe" or "IsLaMoPhObE".
Especially in view of the fact that he called me and other users racist for expounding the problems of blatant misogyny and racism of the Islamic World (which already spreads to Middle Europe). Plus, he glorifies and supports the crimes of the Arab family clans and the Lebanese Mafia by subdividing races and ethnicities into valuable and unworthy to live so that, in his estimation, the non-valuable ethnic groups don't have the right to mention, condemn and take action against those crimes.
This forum has turned into such a far-left extremist bubble that the majority of this community is not timid anymore about despising human dignity and rejecting facts and statistics that don't support their world view. In other words: Atlas has transformed into the woke equivalent of the QAnon/Querdenker bubble.

The fact that not everybody understands how absurd and ignorant Nathan's statement is reveals much about this forum's bias...

[Big Abraham]

Amazon is a highly productive, innovative, and successful company. Rather than being morally bankrupt, it is fundamentally moral

[Хahar 🤔]

This forum has turned into such a far-left extremist bubble that the majority of this community is not timid anymore about despising human dignity and rejecting facts and statistics that don't support their world view. In other words: Atlas has transformed into the woke equivalent of the QAnon/Querdenker bubble.

Didn't you say you were going to leave?

[Continential]

snip

You should go to an asylum.