NC (Gravis/OANN) - Tillis +1 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 28, 2024, 06:11:42 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 Senate & House Election Polls
  NC (Gravis/OANN) - Tillis +1 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: NC (Gravis/OANN) - Tillis +1  (Read 1087 times)
Harvey Updyke Jr🌹
jtsmd2
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 569
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.65, S: -7.22

P P P
« on: June 20, 2020, 07:22:01 PM »

Logged
Harvey Updyke Jr🌹
jtsmd2
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 569
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.65, S: -7.22

P P P
« Reply #1 on: June 20, 2020, 07:22:50 PM »

There should be a gentelmen's agreement:  No OANN polls or that pollster who Shook Nate at 538 banned (The Progress Campaign, I think?)
Logged
Harvey Updyke Jr🌹
jtsmd2
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 569
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.65, S: -7.22

P P P
« Reply #2 on: June 20, 2020, 07:32:43 PM »

There should be a gentelmen's agreement:  No OANN polls or that pollster who Shook Nate at 538 banned (The Progress Campaign, I think?)

No. Let's include both - there are too few polls and if OANN are merely commissioning Gravis and releasing the surveys they like, they're not worse than internal polls.

ok but the latter was banned from 538 for faking data

That should get you on the Atlas sh**t list surely?
Logged
Harvey Updyke Jr🌹
jtsmd2
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 569
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.65, S: -7.22

P P P
« Reply #3 on: June 20, 2020, 09:07:01 PM »
« Edited: June 20, 2020, 09:13:48 PM by Harvey Lee Updyke III🌹 »

There should be a gentelmen's agreement:  No OANN polls or that pollster who Shook Nate at 538 banned (The Progress Campaign, I think?)

No. Let's include both - there are too few polls and if OANN are merely commissioning Gravis and releasing the surveys they like, they're not worse than internal polls.

ok but the latter was banned from 538 for faking data

That should get you on the Atlas sh**t list surely?

They were banned because their earlier, non-scientific surveys were judged when they (ostensibly) only wanted to submit their later surveys. 538 are in the process of re-vetting them.

Did that come from them (progress) or whichever intern answers the emails at 538?  Assholes didn't respond to mine...

Because I saw that in a tweet on their account and I'm not buying it until I hear it from fivethirtyeight.  They're the definition of a fake pollster.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 14 queries.