Post a Democratic NE Victory Map
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 02:14:49 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Post a Democratic NE Victory Map
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Post a Democratic NE Victory Map  (Read 798 times)
walleye26
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,412


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: June 19, 2020, 01:24:05 PM »

I’m guessing this map would be a 60%+ in Douglas and Lancaster Counties, a healthy majority in Sarpy and a large majority in Thurston with other areas keeping it close?
Logged
GM Team Member and Senator WB
weatherboy1102
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,824
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.61, S: -7.83

P
WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: June 19, 2020, 02:09:09 PM »

A razor-sharp victory using a uniform swing from 2016 (+12.53% D, -12.53% R)



Democrat: 46.23%
Republican: 46.22%
Libertarian: 4.61%
Others: 2.94%

closest county is Saline, which is 46.27-45.96.

an actual win would probably have stronger R margins in the rurals, with a few R 80%+ counties, and stronger D margins in Sarpy, Douglas, Lancaster, etc.

I’m guessing this map would be a 60%+ in Douglas and Lancaster Counties

Pretty close. Douglas is 59.86% here and I'd wager that an actual win rather than a uniform swing would have over 60% in Douglas and Lancaster (57.97% D here)

Quote
, a healthy majority in Sarpy
depends on what you call healthy. Here it's about D+4 (47.32-43.49)

Quote
and a large majority in Thurston with other areas keeping it close?
Pretty good majority in Thurston (56.54% D), and keeping Rs under 60% in Scottsbluff, eastern NE and the area between Grand Island, Kearney, and Lexington does it.
Logged
lfromnj
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,365


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: June 19, 2020, 02:54:01 PM »

A razor-sharp victory using a uniform swing from 2016 (+12.53% D, -12.53% R)



Democrat: 46.23%
Republican: 46.22%
Libertarian: 4.61%
Others: 2.94%

closest county is Saline, which is 46.27-45.96.

an actual win would probably have stronger R margins in the rurals, with a few R 80%+ counties, and stronger D margins in Sarpy, Douglas, Lancaster, etc.

I’m guessing this map would be a 60%+ in Douglas and Lancaster Counties

Pretty close. Douglas is 59.86% here and I'd wager that an actual win rather than a uniform swing would have over 60% in Douglas and Lancaster (57.97% D here)

Quote
, a healthy majority in Sarpy
depends on what you call healthy. Here it's about D+4 (47.32-43.49)

Quote
and a large majority in Thurston with other areas keeping it close?
Pretty good majority in Thurston (56.54% D), and keeping Rs under 60% in Scottsbluff, eastern NE and the area between Grand Island, Kearney, and Lexington does it.

Where did that idea come from?
http://centerforpolitics.org/crystalball/articles/kansas-senate-room-for-an-upset/

Logged
Chips
Those Chips
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,245
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: June 24, 2020, 05:32:11 AM »

A razor-sharp victory using a uniform swing from 2016 (+12.53% D, -12.53% R)



Democrat: 46.23%
Republican: 46.22%
Libertarian: 4.61%
Others: 2.94%

closest county is Saline, which is 46.27-45.96.

an actual win would probably have stronger R margins in the rurals, with a few R 80%+ counties, and stronger D margins in Sarpy, Douglas, Lancaster, etc.

I’m guessing this map would be a 60%+ in Douglas and Lancaster Counties

Pretty close. Douglas is 59.86% here and I'd wager that an actual win rather than a uniform swing would have over 60% in Douglas and Lancaster (57.97% D here)

Quote
, a healthy majority in Sarpy
depends on what you call healthy. Here it's about D+4 (47.32-43.49)

Quote
and a large majority in Thurston with other areas keeping it close?
Pretty good majority in Thurston (56.54% D), and keeping Rs under 60% in Scottsbluff, eastern NE and the area between Grand Island, Kearney, and Lexington does it.

Woah.
Logged
Perlen vor den Schweinen
kongress
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 972
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: June 24, 2020, 06:26:51 AM »
« Edited: June 24, 2020, 06:36:23 AM by kongress »

In a NE Dem victory, we'd be seeing something similar to the results of the Initiative that expanded Medicaid, which passed in the 2018 general. A map of the results is illustrated in this tweet:

Logged
walleye26
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,412


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: June 24, 2020, 05:19:37 PM »

Any reason the two Panhandle counties voted in favor?
Logged
GM Team Member and Senator WB
weatherboy1102
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,824
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.61, S: -7.83

P
WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: June 24, 2020, 06:07:19 PM »

Any reason the two Panhandle counties voted in favor?
The one further west is Scottsbluff, the only real city in the area and thus a bit more liberal. Dawes county, the other one, is home to the 3,000 student Chadron State College. The county as a whole has 9,000 people or so
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.039 seconds with 11 queries.