Rank SC, MS, and KY Senate races
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
July 10, 2025, 10:07:27 AM
News: Election Calculator 3.0 with county/house maps is now live. For more info, click here

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Virginiá, KaiserDave)
  Rank SC, MS, and KY Senate races
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Poll
Question: Which of these seats are Dems most likely to win in 2020?
#1
SC
 
#2
MS
 
#3
KY
 
#4
Democrats don't have even a semi-plausible chance in any state
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 53

Author Topic: Rank SC, MS, and KY Senate races  (Read 1545 times)
Orser67
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,976
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: June 14, 2020, 03:05:25 PM »

In light of some recent polls showing close or semi-close races, which of these Southern states do Democrats have the best chances of winning?
Logged
7,052,770
Harry
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,129
Greenland


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: June 14, 2020, 03:11:34 PM »

1. KY
2. SC
3. MS

Always open to changing the rankings as new information comes in.
Logged
Mr.Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 98,814
Jamaica


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -4.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: June 14, 2020, 03:14:43 PM »

SC, TX and KY. Why waste $$$ in MS
Logged
TiltsAreUnderrated
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,097


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: June 14, 2020, 04:42:51 PM »

SC. If there really was a coordinated attempt to release oppo research on Graham in the final few weeks, it could give Harrison a shot.
Logged
Mr.Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 98,814
Jamaica


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -4.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: June 14, 2020, 04:47:38 PM »

Dems have a shot in TX, since Abbott isn't on ballot and Biden is tied with Trump in TX
Logged
SnowLabrador
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,451
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: June 14, 2020, 06:18:48 PM »

All Safe R.
Logged
Mr.Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 98,814
Jamaica


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -4.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: June 14, 2020, 09:21:44 PM »


Replace TX with MS and you have a Supermajority.  Minimum wage havent been raised since 2006 and WC whites want a minimum wage increase just like poor Latinos and African Americans whom work in manufacturing just like WC whites. That's why NC is getting away from Rs

7.25 to 15.00 needs to be raised and since 2006 Rs have been in the WH or Congress as the majority blocking minimum wage Bill
Logged
Tekken_Guy
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,928
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: June 14, 2020, 09:27:16 PM »

At the very least, Harrison could at least help pull Cunningham over the finish line. I don’t see how Cunningham loses if Graham doesn’t carry SC-1 in his Senate race.
Logged
ProgressiveModerate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,520


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: June 14, 2020, 09:35:00 PM »

MS - Safe R, too inelastic
KY - Safe R, KY is too red, and they've had him fro all these years, plus he gves KY a seat at the table they otherwise wouldn't have
SC - Likely R, Lindsay Graham has defiantely become less popular, but SC is very inelastic, but still slightly less red than MS.
Logged
Orser67
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,976
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: June 14, 2020, 09:39:45 PM »

1)South Carolina
2)Kentucky
(large gap for comical effect)
3)Mississippi

South Carolina and Kentucky are both Likely R at this point for me, although both are far closer to Safe than Lean. MS is Titanium R.
Logged
Calthrina950
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,913
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: June 14, 2020, 09:46:17 PM »

MS - Safe R, too inelastic
KY - Safe R, KY is too red, and they've had him fro all these years, plus he gives KY a seat at the table they otherwise wouldn't have
SC - Likely R, Lindsay Graham has definitely become less popular, but SC is very inelastic, but still slightly less red than MS.

I agree with your ranking here, but a paradox is evident here, with regards to Lindsey Graham's popularity. By turning himself into a staunch Trumpist, he has locked up the loyalty of the Republican base, as demonstrated by the fact that he won his primary with an overwhelming majority this time. Conversely, Graham has weakened his position with independents and Democrats, who once held a higher regard for him as one of the Senate's "maverick" conservatives. Hence, a Graham victory by high single digits against Jaime Harrison would not surprise me.
Logged
TiltsAreUnderrated
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,097


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: June 14, 2020, 09:49:38 PM »

W.r.t. MS and KY, I’m not sure which is a more likely Democratic flip. They’re both safe, non-titanium R right now (Democratic chances are <5% but a winning coalition is theoretically possible in both states). That being said, if the Democratic nominee stepped aside in KY and was replaced (is this legal in KY? It is in some states) by an especially strong candidate, the race would instantly become competitive. There’s no obvious figure for whom this would be true in MS, so my rankings go:

1. SC
(Big gap)
2. KY
3. MS

If Trump’s terrible trend somehow got even worse (I have a hard time seeing any acceleration beyond the steady decline at this point), these non-titanium races might become competitive, along with - perhaps - AL-SEN. I just don’t see it so they’re all (SC aside) still safe R in my book.
Logged
GlobeSoc
The walrus
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,979


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: June 14, 2020, 09:50:30 PM »

South Carolina is the only one that might be winnable in a sub-double digit year if Graham falls asleep at the wheel or something. Now, if the bottom falls out for Republicans and Biden/congressional dems are winning by double digits, KY might be in reach just because of McConnel's inevitable underperformance - usually KY is too republican for it to matter though, and outside of an absolutely perfect storm it won't flip. If the economy wasn't such epic trash i'd say that the volatility wouldn't be there for a KY flip to be possible; this is the difference between a 0% and a ~2-5% chance though, not too much in the grand scheme of things. It certainly isn't a high enough chance to stop meming about mcconnel's invincibility, because a McConnel+6 win is still a win for McConnel lol

MS won't flip period, but it may have some interesting swings in the Jackson metro.
Logged
Mr.Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 98,814
Jamaica


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -4.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: June 14, 2020, 10:03:28 PM »

SC
TX
KY
MS

In that order
Logged
andjey
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,529
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: June 14, 2020, 11:53:05 PM »

1. SC: Likely R
2. KY: Safe R
3. MS: Safe R
Logged
YE
Modadmin
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,741


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: -0.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: June 15, 2020, 01:11:49 AM »

All safe R. Not really buying the SC hype.
Logged
For Trump, everything. For immigrants, the law
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,457
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: June 15, 2020, 01:53:39 AM »

Realistically, all of them are Safe R, but SC will probably be the closest.
Logged
We Live in Black and White
SvenTC
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,694
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.81, S: -6.82

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: June 15, 2020, 02:17:45 AM »

There is a universe in which we win SC, but that window is borderline impossibly narrow. The other two are safe.
Logged
Mr.Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 98,814
Jamaica


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -4.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: June 15, 2020, 03:44:02 AM »

All safe R. Not really buying the SC hype.

Harrison can win and Dems are targeting TX and TX is a battleground state at Prez level
Logged
RussFeingoldWasRobbed
Progress96
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,134
United States


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -6.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: June 17, 2020, 12:37:09 AM »

MS will flip someday but 2020 is too early. I say 2030s
SC is going to trend hard R this decade
Logged
VAR
VARepublican
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,753
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: June 17, 2020, 01:58:42 AM »

All Safe R.
Logged
Mr.Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 98,814
Jamaica


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -4.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: June 17, 2020, 03:05:59 AM »


SC can flip.
Logged
smoltchanov
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,660
Russian Federation


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: June 17, 2020, 12:52:54 PM »

SC, but - unlikely too.
Logged
Mr.Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 98,814
Jamaica


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -4.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: June 17, 2020, 01:02:25 PM »


Yes it can with Biden leading by 13 pts nationally
Logged
Consuming is good, it's what we're made for
20RP12
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,185
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.29, S: -7.13


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: June 17, 2020, 01:06:13 PM »

SC is most likely but yeah none of these are flipping.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.048 seconds with 11 queries.