Which GOP primary field was worse? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 08:31:38 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Which GOP primary field was worse? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Which GOP primary field was worse?
#1
2012
 
#2
2016
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 56

Author Topic: Which GOP primary field was worse?  (Read 1923 times)
Orser67
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,946
United States


« on: June 11, 2020, 07:51:58 AM »

This is tough, because the average candidate in 2012 was imo worse, but 2016 was top-heavy in terms of terribleness. In 2012, Romney and Huntsman were pretty ok, but the rest of the field was miserable. At various times, Rick Santorum, Newt Gingrich, Herman Cain, and Michelle Bachmann were either first or second in national polling, according to RCP. Also Rick Perry, who is maybe not quite as bad as the last four, but still, ugh.

2016 had relatively non-terrible candidates like Jeb!, Rubio, and Kasich, but I'm not sure if there's ever been a worse top two than Trump and Cruz. Some of the lower-tier candidates were also pretty terrible, e.g. Ben Carson and Santorum. Ultimately I went with 2012.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 14 queries.