Which GOP primary field was worse? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 07:15:09 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Which GOP primary field was worse? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Which GOP primary field was worse?
#1
2012		  
#2
2016		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 56

Author Topic: Which GOP primary field was worse?  (Read 1911 times)
President Biden Democrat
mrappaport1220
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 569
United States


P P
WWW
« on: June 13, 2020, 07:09:36 PM »
The field overall was better in 2016. There were more candidates and stronger candidates overall. The nominee, Romney was much better than the 2012, then Trump in 2016.
Logged
President Biden Democrat
mrappaport1220
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 569
United States


P P
WWW
« Reply #1 on: June 24, 2020, 11:49:32 PM »
2012, hands down. 2016 field overall was fairly strong and had voices from all over the party. There were many strong candidates including Trump, Rubio, and others. Anybody in 2012 would have had a tough time beating Obama, even if there was a better field of choices.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 15 queries.