Which GOP primary field was worse? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 08:41:13 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Which GOP primary field was worse? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Which GOP primary field was worse?
#1
2012
 
#2
2016
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 56

Author Topic: Which GOP primary field was worse?  (Read 1924 times)
dw93
DWL
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,881
United States


« on: June 12, 2020, 06:37:15 PM »
« edited: June 12, 2020, 06:42:39 PM by dw93 »

2012 had better "credible" candidates (Romney, Huntsman, Pawlenty to a lesser extent) than 2016 (Bush, Kasich, Rubio). However, the fringe of 2012 (Bachmann, Cain, Santorum, Gingrich, Paul, Perry) were wackier than the fringe of 2016, but 2016 obviously had more wacky candidates quantity wise. That said, 2016 was worse as the credible candidates couldn't beat the wacky that year (Trump with Cruz in 2nd), whereas credible won the nomination in 2012.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.016 seconds with 13 queries.