Why did the Republicans pass and support the Sherman Antitrust Act? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 09:31:10 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  History (Moderator: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee)
  Why did the Republicans pass and support the Sherman Antitrust Act? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why did the Republicans pass and support the Sherman Antitrust Act?  (Read 625 times)
Orser67
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,946
United States


« on: June 02, 2020, 08:20:00 PM »

The Republican Party did generally have a close and sympathetic relationship with businesses, but it wasn't a total slave to big business and it did have other electoral concerns. For example, Harrison also signed into law the Sherman Silver Purchase Act and one of the first major conservationist laws, the General Revision Act.

By the late 19th century, there was a widely-held notion that some businesses (particularly railroads) had gotten a little too big and powerful and that the federal government should step in to do something. The Populist Party and its antecedents were calling for more far-reaching reforms, but two fairly weak laws were passed instead: the Interstate Commerce Act of 1887 (passed by a Republican Senate and a Democratic House, and signed into law by Cleveland) and the Sherman Act.

Ultimately, the Sherman Act was largely rendered toothless due to weak presidential enforcement (by Harrison, Cleveland, and McKinley) and Supreme Court decisions like United States v. E. C. Knight Co. It wasn't until Teddy Roosevelt took office that the U.S. got serious about breaking up trusts.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 13 queries.