June 2020 Federalist Party Convention (Adjourned)

[S019]

2. Preffing non-Federalists (including one of the worst) above actual Federalist candidates for upcoming elections disqualifies you from being anywhere close to becoming the party's chair. You don't even deserve a pref...

I'm sorry? Which candidate was it that was a non-Federalist?

S019. He hasn't been a Federalist in a year.

Actually less than a year, a little under 11.5 months, actually.

[Saint Milei]

Bro didnt even know S019 wasn't a fed anymore. That's not a good look

[fhtagn]

2. Preffing non-Federalists (including one of the worst) above actual Federalist candidates for upcoming elections disqualifies you from being anywhere close to becoming the party's chair. You don't even deserve a pref...

I'm sorry? Which candidate was it that was a non-Federalist?

BTW, there were three choices...I ranked them in order of my preference, as the process allows for.  You had your vote, and I had mine.  If I made a mistake, it was mine alone.  Unless you're whipping votes in a major election, and/or designated as the whip, don't tell me (although you may suggest) how to vote.  And get off your high horse. 

If you are trying to lead the party as a true conservative, throwing a preference to S019 is no way to do it. If you wanted to lead the party, I shouldn't have to tell you not to vote for him.

[S019]

2. Preffing non-Federalists (including one of the worst) above actual Federalist candidates for upcoming elections disqualifies you from being anywhere close to becoming the party's chair. You don't even deserve a pref...

I'm sorry? Which candidate was it that was a non-Federalist?

BTW, there were three choices...I ranked them in order of my preference, as the process allows for.  You had your vote, and I had mine.  If I made a mistake, it was mine alone.  Unless you're whipping votes in a major election, and/or designated as the whip, don't tell me (although you may suggest) how to vote.  And get off your high horse.  

If you are trying to lead the party as a true conservative, throwing a preference to S019 is no way to do it. If you wanted to lead the party, I shouldn't have to tell you not to vote for him.

I still have quite a few conservative views. For instance, I'm in favor of curfews, opposed to drug legalization, in favor of sin taxes, etc. Also it's irrelevant to Atlasia, but I'm still quite right-wing on foreign policy. I'm also opposed to marijuana legalization, which I know is a big issue on the right. I'm not this extreme leftist that you think I am, I think we still have enough crossover between our views, for me to be a viable candidate for your endorsement.

[Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee]

2. Preffing non-Federalists (including one of the worst) above actual Federalist candidates for upcoming elections disqualifies you from being anywhere close to becoming the party's chair. You don't even deserve a pref...

I'm sorry? Which candidate was it that was a non-Federalist?

BTW, there were three choices...I ranked them in order of my preference, as the process allows for.  You had your vote, and I had mine.  If I made a mistake, it was mine alone.  Unless you're whipping votes in a major election, and/or designated as the whip, don't tell me (although you may suggest) how to vote.  And get off your high horse.  

If you are trying to lead the party as a true conservative, throwing a preference to S019 is no way to do it. If you wanted to lead the party, I shouldn't have to tell you not to vote for him.

I still have quite a few conservative views. For instance, I'm in favor of curfews, opposed to drug legalization, in favor of sin taxes, etc. Also it's irrelevant to Atlasia, but I'm still quite right-wing on foreign policy. I'm also opposed to marijuana legalization, which I know is a big issue on the right. I'm not this extreme leftist that you think I am, I think we still have enough crossover between our views, for me to be a viable candidate for your endorsement.

You do realize I hope why citing this with Fhtagn is probably not going to work?

[Deep Dixieland Senator, Muad'dib (OSR MSR)]

I still have quite a few conservative AUTHORITARIAN views. For instance, I'm in favor of curfews, opposed to drug legalization, in favor of sin taxes, etc.

[fhtagn]

2. Preffing non-Federalists (including one of the worst) above actual Federalist candidates for upcoming elections disqualifies you from being anywhere close to becoming the party's chair. You don't even deserve a pref...

I'm sorry? Which candidate was it that was a non-Federalist?

BTW, there were three choices...I ranked them in order of my preference, as the process allows for.  You had your vote, and I had mine.  If I made a mistake, it was mine alone.  Unless you're whipping votes in a major election, and/or designated as the whip, don't tell me (although you may suggest) how to vote.  And get off your high horse.  

If you are trying to lead the party as a true conservative, throwing a preference to S019 is no way to do it. If you wanted to lead the party, I shouldn't have to tell you not to vote for him.

I still have quite a few conservative views. For instance, I'm in favor of curfews, opposed to drug legalization, in favor of sin taxes, etc. Also it's irrelevant to Atlasia, but I'm still quite right-wing on foreign policy. I'm also opposed to marijuana legalization, which I know is a big issue on the right. I'm not this extreme leftist that you think I am, I think we still have enough crossover between our views, for me to be a viable candidate for your endorsement.

Just about everything you listed has nothing in common with the vast majority of the Atlasian right.

[West_Midlander]

Extreme authoritarianism and radical prohibitionism are not at all in line with my views and they do not align with the views of the members of this party very much at all. Radical authoritarianism is certainly not in line with the ideology of this party's libertarian or libertarian-leaning members in particular.

Furthermore, I assume the gentleman from New Jersey means hawkish foreign policy when he describes being "right-wing" on the issue but the right and left spectrum is usually reserved to economic issues.

[Saint Milei]

S019 thinks it's the 80s where every republican is an aggressive social conservative and a believer in the neocon doctrine. Fam it's 2020 we off that nonsense

[Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon]

I move to declare Pericles chair of the party until further notice, and I ask for the Yeas and Nays.

[GM Team Member and Senator WB]

Sit down you socialist

responding to a dumb thing with an equally dumb answer

[At-Large Senator LouisvilleThunder]

Our next convention city will be Minneapolis, MN in Fremont!


Candidates=10 Seats=1 Votes=16 Quota=8
Raw votes
vote 1: (Minneapolis, MN) (Providence, RI) (Kansas City, MO) (Charlottesville, VA) (Clinton, NC) (Atlanta, GA) (Conservative, KS) (Indianapolis, IN) (St. Louis, MO) (none)
vote 2: (Minneapolis, MN) (Atlanta, GA) (Conservative, KS) (Kansas City, MO) (Charlottesville, VA) (Indianapolis, IN) (Providence, RI) (St. Louis, MO) (Clinton, NC) (none)
vote 3: (Kansas City, MO) (Minneapolis, MN) (Providence, RI) (Indianapolis, IN) (Charlottesville, VA) (Conservative, KS) (Atlanta, GA) (St. Louis, MO) (Clinton, NC) (none)
vote 4: (Atlanta, GA) (Minneapolis, MN) (St. Louis, MO) (Kansas City, MO) (Indianapolis, IN) (Providence, RI) (Charlottesville, VA) (Clinton, NC) (Conservative, KS) (none)
vote 5: (Conservative, KS) (St. Louis, MO) (Kansas City, MO) (Charlottesville, VA) (Atlanta, GA) (Clinton, NC) (Providence, RI) (Indianapolis, IN) (none) (none)
vote 6: (Clinton, NC) (St. Louis, MO) (Conservative, KS) (Kansas City, MO) (Indianapolis, IN) (Atlanta, GA) (Charlottesville, VA) (Minneapolis, MN) (Providence, RI) (none)
vote 7: (Providence, RI) (Minneapolis, MN) (Indianapolis, IN) (Kansas City, MO) (St. Louis, MO) (Charlottesville, VA) (Atlanta, GA) (Clinton, NC) (Conservative, KS) (none)
vote 8: (Clinton, NC) (none) (none) (none) (none) (none) (none) (none) (none) (none)
vote 9: (Conservative, KS) (Minneapolis, MN) (St. Louis, MO) (Indianapolis, IN) (Providence, RI) (Kansas City, MO) (Clinton, NC) (Atlanta, GA) (Charlottesville, VA) (none)
vote 10: (Minneapolis, MN) (Atlanta, GA) (Charlottesville, VA) (Conservative, KS) (Providence, RI) (Clinton, NC) (St. Louis, MO) (Kansas City, MO) (Indianapolis, IN) (none)
vote 11: (Indianapolis, IN) (Providence, RI) (St. Louis, MO) (Atlanta, GA) (Kansas City, MO) (Charlottesville, VA) (none) (none) (none) (none)
vote 12: (Providence, RI) (Charlottesville, VA) (Conservative, KS) (none) (none) (none) (none) (none) (none) (none)
vote 13: (Charlottesville, VA) (none) (none) (none) (none) (none) (none) (none) (none) (none)
vote 14: (Portland, OR) (Atlanta, GA) (Kansas City, MO) (none) (none) (none) (none) (none) (none) (none)
vote 15: (Charlottesville, VA) (Providence, RI) (Clinton, NC) (Atlanta, GA) (St. Louis, MO) (Kansas City, MO) (Indianapolis, IN) (Minneapolis, MN) (Conservative, KS) (none)
vote 16: (Providence, RI) (St. Louis, MO) (Clinton, NC) (Charlottesville, VA) (Kansas City, MO) (Atlanta, GA) (Conservative, KS) (Minneapolis, MN) (Indianapolis, IN) (none)
Round 1 votes
vote 1: (Minneapolis, MN) (Providence, RI) (Kansas City, MO) (Charlottesville, VA) (Clinton, NC) (Atlanta, GA) (Conservative, KS) (Indianapolis, IN) (St. Louis, MO) vote value = 1
vote 2: (Minneapolis, MN) (Atlanta, GA) (Conservative, KS) (Kansas City, MO) (Charlottesville, VA) (Indianapolis, IN) (Providence, RI) (St. Louis, MO) (Clinton, NC) vote value = 1
vote 3: (Kansas City, MO) (Minneapolis, MN) (Providence, RI) (Indianapolis, IN) (Charlottesville, VA) (Conservative, KS) (Atlanta, GA) (St. Louis, MO) (Clinton, NC) vote value = 1
vote 4: (Atlanta, GA) (Minneapolis, MN) (St. Louis, MO) (Kansas City, MO) (Indianapolis, IN) (Providence, RI) (Charlottesville, VA) (Clinton, NC) (Conservative, KS) vote value = 1
vote 5: (Conservative, KS) (St. Louis, MO) (Kansas City, MO) (Charlottesville, VA) (Atlanta, GA) (Clinton, NC) (Providence, RI) (Indianapolis, IN) vote value = 1
vote 6: (Clinton, NC) (St. Louis, MO) (Conservative, KS) (Kansas City, MO) (Indianapolis, IN) (Atlanta, GA) (Charlottesville, VA) (Minneapolis, MN) (Providence, RI) vote value = 1
vote 7: (Providence, RI) (Minneapolis, MN) (Indianapolis, IN) (Kansas City, MO) (St. Louis, MO) (Charlottesville, VA) (Atlanta, GA) (Clinton, NC) (Conservative, KS) vote value = 1
vote 8: (Clinton, NC) vote value = 1
vote 9: (Conservative, KS) (Minneapolis, MN) (St. Louis, MO) (Indianapolis, IN) (Providence, RI) (Kansas City, MO) (Clinton, NC) (Atlanta, GA) (Charlottesville, VA) vote value = 1
vote 10: (Minneapolis, MN) (Atlanta, GA) (Charlottesville, VA) (Conservative, KS) (Providence, RI) (Clinton, NC) (St. Louis, MO) (Kansas City, MO) (Indianapolis, IN) vote value = 1
vote 11: (Indianapolis, IN) (Providence, RI) (St. Louis, MO) (Atlanta, GA) (Kansas City, MO) (Charlottesville, VA) vote value = 1
vote 12: (Providence, RI) (Charlottesville, VA) (Conservative, KS) vote value = 1
vote 13: (Charlottesville, VA) vote value = 1
vote 14: (Portland, OR) (Atlanta, GA) (Kansas City, MO) vote value = 1
vote 15: (Charlottesville, VA) (Providence, RI) (Clinton, NC) (Atlanta, GA) (St. Louis, MO) (Kansas City, MO) (Indianapolis, IN) (Minneapolis, MN) (Conservative, KS) vote value = 1
vote 16: (Providence, RI) (St. Louis, MO) (Clinton, NC) (Charlottesville, VA) (Kansas City, MO) (Atlanta, GA) (Conservative, KS) (Minneapolis, MN) (Indianapolis, IN) vote value = 1

Charlottesville, VA = 2
Providence, RI = 3
Kansas City, MO = 1
Indianapolis, IN = 1
Atlanta, GA = 1
Minneapolis, MN = 3
Conservative, KS = 2
Clinton, NC = 2
St. Louis, MO = 0
Portland, OR = 1

Fewest votes won by a candidate = 1.
Number of candidates with the fewest votes = 4.
The tiebreaker loser is Atlanta, GA.
Atlanta, GA is eliminated.
Round 2 votes
vote 1: (Minneapolis, MN) (Providence, RI) (Kansas City, MO) (Charlottesville, VA) (Clinton, NC) (Conservative, KS) (Indianapolis, IN) vote value = 1
vote 2: (Minneapolis, MN) (Conservative, KS) (Kansas City, MO) (Charlottesville, VA) (Indianapolis, IN) (Providence, RI) (Clinton, NC) vote value = 1
vote 3: (Kansas City, MO) (Minneapolis, MN) (Providence, RI) (Indianapolis, IN) (Charlottesville, VA) (Conservative, KS) (Clinton, NC) vote value = 1
vote 4: (Minneapolis, MN) (Kansas City, MO) (Indianapolis, IN) (Providence, RI) (Charlottesville, VA) (Clinton, NC) (Conservative, KS) vote value = 1
vote 5: (Conservative, KS) (Kansas City, MO) (Charlottesville, VA) (Clinton, NC) (Providence, RI) (Indianapolis, IN) vote value = 1
vote 6: (Clinton, NC) (Conservative, KS) (Kansas City, MO) (Indianapolis, IN) (Charlottesville, VA) (Minneapolis, MN) (Providence, RI) vote value = 1
vote 7: (Providence, RI) (Minneapolis, MN) (Indianapolis, IN) (Kansas City, MO) (Charlottesville, VA) (Clinton, NC) (Conservative, KS) vote value = 1
vote 8: (Clinton, NC) vote value = 1
vote 9: (Conservative, KS) (Minneapolis, MN) (Indianapolis, IN) (Providence, RI) (Kansas City, MO) (Clinton, NC) (Charlottesville, VA) vote value = 1
vote 10: (Minneapolis, MN) (Charlottesville, VA) (Conservative, KS) (Providence, RI) (Clinton, NC) (Kansas City, MO) (Indianapolis, IN) vote value = 1
vote 11: (Indianapolis, IN) (Providence, RI) (Kansas City, MO) (Charlottesville, VA) vote value = 1
vote 12: (Providence, RI) (Charlottesville, VA) (Conservative, KS) vote value = 1
vote 13: (Charlottesville, VA) vote value = 1
vote 14: (Portland, OR) (Kansas City, MO) vote value = 1
vote 15: (Charlottesville, VA) (Providence, RI) (Clinton, NC) (Kansas City, MO) (Indianapolis, IN) (Minneapolis, MN) (Conservative, KS) vote value = 1
vote 16: (Providence, RI) (Clinton, NC) (Charlottesville, VA) (Kansas City, MO) (Conservative, KS) (Minneapolis, MN) (Indianapolis, IN) vote value = 1

Charlottesville, VA = 2
Providence, RI = 3
Kansas City, MO = 1
Indianapolis, IN = 1
Atlanta, GA = 0
Minneapolis, MN = 4
Conservative, KS = 2
Clinton, NC = 2
St. Louis, MO = 0
Portland, OR = 1

Fewest votes won by a candidate = 1.
Number of candidates with the fewest votes = 3.
The tiebreaker loser is Kansas City, MO.
Kansas City, MO is eliminated.
Round 3 votes
vote 1: (Minneapolis, MN) (Providence, RI) (Charlottesville, VA) (Clinton, NC) (Conservative, KS) (Indianapolis, IN) vote value = 1
vote 2: (Minneapolis, MN) (Conservative, KS) (Charlottesville, VA) (Indianapolis, IN) (Providence, RI) (Clinton, NC) vote value = 1
vote 3: (Minneapolis, MN) (Providence, RI) (Indianapolis, IN) (Charlottesville, VA) (Conservative, KS) (Clinton, NC) vote value = 1
vote 4: (Minneapolis, MN) (Indianapolis, IN) (Providence, RI) (Charlottesville, VA) (Clinton, NC) (Conservative, KS) vote value = 1
vote 5: (Conservative, KS) (Charlottesville, VA) (Clinton, NC) (Providence, RI) (Indianapolis, IN) vote value = 1
vote 6: (Clinton, NC) (Conservative, KS) (Indianapolis, IN) (Charlottesville, VA) (Minneapolis, MN) (Providence, RI) vote value = 1
vote 7: (Providence, RI) (Minneapolis, MN) (Indianapolis, IN) (Charlottesville, VA) (Clinton, NC) (Conservative, KS) vote value = 1
vote 8: (Clinton, NC) vote value = 1
vote 9: (Conservative, KS) (Minneapolis, MN) (Indianapolis, IN) (Providence, RI) (Clinton, NC) (Charlottesville, VA) vote value = 1
vote 10: (Minneapolis, MN) (Charlottesville, VA) (Conservative, KS) (Providence, RI) (Clinton, NC) (Indianapolis, IN) vote value = 1
vote 11: (Indianapolis, IN) (Providence, RI) (Charlottesville, VA) vote value = 1
vote 12: (Providence, RI) (Charlottesville, VA) (Conservative, KS) vote value = 1
vote 13: (Charlottesville, VA) vote value = 1
vote 14: (Portland, OR) vote value = 1
vote 15: (Charlottesville, VA) (Providence, RI) (Clinton, NC) (Indianapolis, IN) (Minneapolis, MN) (Conservative, KS) vote value = 1
vote 16: (Providence, RI) (Clinton, NC) (Charlottesville, VA) (Conservative, KS) (Minneapolis, MN) (Indianapolis, IN) vote value = 1

Charlottesville, VA = 2
Providence, RI = 3
Kansas City, MO = 0
Indianapolis, IN = 1
Atlanta, GA = 0
Minneapolis, MN = 5
Conservative, KS = 2
Clinton, NC = 2
St. Louis, MO = 0
Portland, OR = 1

Fewest votes won by a candidate = 1.
Number of candidates with the fewest votes = 2.
The tiebreaker loser is Indianapolis, IN.
Indianapolis, IN is eliminated.
Round 4 votes
vote 1: (Minneapolis, MN) (Providence, RI) (Charlottesville, VA) (Clinton, NC) (Conservative, KS) vote value = 1
vote 2: (Minneapolis, MN) (Conservative, KS) (Charlottesville, VA) (Providence, RI) (Clinton, NC) vote value = 1
vote 3: (Minneapolis, MN) (Providence, RI) (Charlottesville, VA) (Conservative, KS) (Clinton, NC) vote value = 1
vote 4: (Minneapolis, MN) (Providence, RI) (Charlottesville, VA) (Clinton, NC) (Conservative, KS) vote value = 1
vote 5: (Conservative, KS) (Charlottesville, VA) (Clinton, NC) (Providence, RI) vote value = 1
vote 6: (Clinton, NC) (Conservative, KS) (Charlottesville, VA) (Minneapolis, MN) (Providence, RI) vote value = 1
vote 7: (Providence, RI) (Minneapolis, MN) (Charlottesville, VA) (Clinton, NC) (Conservative, KS) vote value = 1
vote 8: (Clinton, NC) vote value = 1
vote 9: (Conservative, KS) (Minneapolis, MN) (Providence, RI) (Clinton, NC) (Charlottesville, VA) vote value = 1
vote 10: (Minneapolis, MN) (Charlottesville, VA) (Conservative, KS) (Providence, RI) (Clinton, NC) vote value = 1
vote 11: (Providence, RI) (Charlottesville, VA) vote value = 1
vote 12: (Providence, RI) (Charlottesville, VA) (Conservative, KS) vote value = 1
vote 13: (Charlottesville, VA) vote value = 1
vote 14: (Portland, OR) vote value = 1
vote 15: (Charlottesville, VA) (Providence, RI) (Clinton, NC) (Minneapolis, MN) (Conservative, KS) vote value = 1
vote 16: (Providence, RI) (Clinton, NC) (Charlottesville, VA) (Conservative, KS) (Minneapolis, MN) vote value = 1

Charlottesville, VA = 2
Providence, RI = 4
Kansas City, MO = 0
Indianapolis, IN = 0
Atlanta, GA = 0
Minneapolis, MN = 5
Conservative, KS = 2
Clinton, NC = 2
St. Louis, MO = 0
Portland, OR = 1

Fewest votes won by a candidate = 1.
Number of candidates with the fewest votes = 1.
Portland, OR is eliminated.
Round 5 votes
vote 1: (Minneapolis, MN) (Providence, RI) (Charlottesville, VA) (Clinton, NC) (Conservative, KS) vote value = 1
vote 2: (Minneapolis, MN) (Conservative, KS) (Charlottesville, VA) (Providence, RI) (Clinton, NC) vote value = 1
vote 3: (Minneapolis, MN) (Providence, RI) (Charlottesville, VA) (Conservative, KS) (Clinton, NC) vote value = 1
vote 4: (Minneapolis, MN) (Providence, RI) (Charlottesville, VA) (Clinton, NC) (Conservative, KS) vote value = 1
vote 5: (Conservative, KS) (Charlottesville, VA) (Clinton, NC) (Providence, RI) vote value = 1
vote 6: (Clinton, NC) (Conservative, KS) (Charlottesville, VA) (Minneapolis, MN) (Providence, RI) vote value = 1
vote 7: (Providence, RI) (Minneapolis, MN) (Charlottesville, VA) (Clinton, NC) (Conservative, KS) vote value = 1
vote 8: (Clinton, NC) vote value = 1
vote 9: (Conservative, KS) (Minneapolis, MN) (Providence, RI) (Clinton, NC) (Charlottesville, VA) vote value = 1
vote 10: (Minneapolis, MN) (Charlottesville, VA) (Conservative, KS) (Providence, RI) (Clinton, NC) vote value = 1
vote 11: (Providence, RI) (Charlottesville, VA) vote value = 1
vote 12: (Providence, RI) (Charlottesville, VA) (Conservative, KS) vote value = 1
vote 13: (Charlottesville, VA) vote value = 1
vote 14: vote value = 1
vote 15: (Charlottesville, VA) (Providence, RI) (Clinton, NC) (Minneapolis, MN) (Conservative, KS) vote value = 1
vote 16: (Providence, RI) (Clinton, NC) (Charlottesville, VA) (Conservative, KS) (Minneapolis, MN) vote value = 1

Charlottesville, VA = 2
Providence, RI = 4
Kansas City, MO = 0
Indianapolis, IN = 0
Atlanta, GA = 0
Minneapolis, MN = 5
Conservative, KS = 2
Clinton, NC = 2
St. Louis, MO = 0
Portland, OR = 0

Fewest votes won by a candidate = 2.
Number of candidates with the fewest votes = 3.
The tiebreaker loser is Conservative, KS.
Conservative, KS is eliminated.
Round 6 votes
vote 1: (Minneapolis, MN) (Providence, RI) (Charlottesville, VA) (Clinton, NC) vote value = 1
vote 2: (Minneapolis, MN) (Charlottesville, VA) (Providence, RI) (Clinton, NC) vote value = 1
vote 3: (Minneapolis, MN) (Providence, RI) (Charlottesville, VA) (Clinton, NC) vote value = 1
vote 4: (Minneapolis, MN) (Providence, RI) (Charlottesville, VA) (Clinton, NC) vote value = 1
vote 5: (Charlottesville, VA) (Clinton, NC) (Providence, RI) vote value = 1
vote 6: (Clinton, NC) (Charlottesville, VA) (Minneapolis, MN) (Providence, RI) vote value = 1
vote 7: (Providence, RI) (Minneapolis, MN) (Charlottesville, VA) (Clinton, NC) vote value = 1
vote 8: (Clinton, NC) vote value = 1
vote 9: (Minneapolis, MN) (Providence, RI) (Clinton, NC) (Charlottesville, VA) vote value = 1
vote 10: (Minneapolis, MN) (Charlottesville, VA) (Providence, RI) (Clinton, NC) vote value = 1
vote 11: (Providence, RI) (Charlottesville, VA) vote value = 1
vote 12: (Providence, RI) (Charlottesville, VA) vote value = 1
vote 13: (Charlottesville, VA) vote value = 1
vote 14: vote value = 1
vote 15: (Charlottesville, VA) (Providence, RI) (Clinton, NC) (Minneapolis, MN) vote value = 1
vote 16: (Providence, RI) (Clinton, NC) (Charlottesville, VA) (Minneapolis, MN) vote value = 1

Charlottesville, VA = 3
Providence, RI = 4
Kansas City, MO = 0
Indianapolis, IN = 0
Atlanta, GA = 0
Minneapolis, MN = 6
Conservative, KS = 0
Clinton, NC = 2
St. Louis, MO = 0
Portland, OR = 0

Fewest votes won by a candidate = 2.
Number of candidates with the fewest votes = 1.
Clinton, NC is eliminated.
Round 7 votes
vote 1: (Minneapolis, MN) (Providence, RI) (Charlottesville, VA) vote value = 1
vote 2: (Minneapolis, MN) (Charlottesville, VA) (Providence, RI) vote value = 1
vote 3: (Minneapolis, MN) (Providence, RI) (Charlottesville, VA) vote value = 1
vote 4: (Minneapolis, MN) (Providence, RI) (Charlottesville, VA) vote value = 1
vote 5: (Charlottesville, VA) (Providence, RI) vote value = 1
vote 6: (Charlottesville, VA) (Minneapolis, MN) (Providence, RI) vote value = 1
vote 7: (Providence, RI) (Minneapolis, MN) (Charlottesville, VA) vote value = 1
vote 8: vote value = 1
vote 9: (Minneapolis, MN) (Providence, RI) (Charlottesville, VA) vote value = 1
vote 10: (Minneapolis, MN) (Charlottesville, VA) (Providence, RI) vote value = 1
vote 11: (Providence, RI) (Charlottesville, VA) vote value = 1
vote 12: (Providence, RI) (Charlottesville, VA) vote value = 1
vote 13: (Charlottesville, VA) vote value = 1
vote 14: vote value = 1
vote 15: (Charlottesville, VA) (Providence, RI) (Minneapolis, MN) vote value = 1
vote 16: (Providence, RI) (Charlottesville, VA) (Minneapolis, MN) vote value = 1

Charlottesville, VA = 4
Providence, RI = 4
Kansas City, MO = 0
Indianapolis, IN = 0
Atlanta, GA = 0
Minneapolis, MN = 6
Conservative, KS = 0
Clinton, NC = 0
St. Louis, MO = 0
Portland, OR = 0

Fewest votes won by a candidate = 4.
Number of candidates with the fewest votes = 2.
The tiebreaker loser is Charlottesville, VA.
Charlottesville, VA is eliminated.
Round 8 votes
vote 1: (Minneapolis, MN) (Providence, RI) vote value = 1
vote 2: (Minneapolis, MN) (Providence, RI) vote value = 1
vote 3: (Minneapolis, MN) (Providence, RI) vote value = 1
vote 4: (Minneapolis, MN) (Providence, RI) vote value = 1
vote 5: (Providence, RI) vote value = 1
vote 6: (Minneapolis, MN) (Providence, RI) vote value = 1
vote 7: (Providence, RI) (Minneapolis, MN) vote value = 1
vote 8: vote value = 1
vote 9: (Minneapolis, MN) (Providence, RI) vote value = 1
vote 10: (Minneapolis, MN) (Providence, RI) vote value = 1
vote 11: (Providence, RI) vote value = 1
vote 12: (Providence, RI) vote value = 1
vote 13: vote value = 1
vote 14: vote value = 1
vote 15: (Providence, RI) (Minneapolis, MN) vote value = 1
vote 16: (Providence, RI) (Minneapolis, MN) vote value = 1

Charlottesville, VA = 0
Providence, RI = 6
Kansas City, MO = 0
Indianapolis, IN = 0
Atlanta, GA = 0
Minneapolis, MN = 7
Conservative, KS = 0
Clinton, NC = 0
St. Louis, MO = 0
Portland, OR = 0

Fewest votes won by a candidate = 6.
Number of candidates with the fewest votes = 1.
Providence, RI is eliminated.
Round 9 votes
vote 1: (Minneapolis, MN) vote value = 1
vote 2: (Minneapolis, MN) vote value = 1
vote 3: (Minneapolis, MN) vote value = 1
vote 4: (Minneapolis, MN) vote value = 1
vote 5: vote value = 1
vote 6: (Minneapolis, MN) vote value = 1
vote 7: (Minneapolis, MN) vote value = 1
vote 8: vote value = 1
vote 9: (Minneapolis, MN) vote value = 1
vote 10: (Minneapolis, MN) vote value = 1
vote 11: vote value = 1
vote 12: vote value = 1
vote 13: vote value = 1
vote 14: vote value = 1
vote 15: (Minneapolis, MN) vote value = 1
vote 16: (Minneapolis, MN) vote value = 1

Charlottesville, VA = 0
Providence, RI = 0
Kansas City, MO = 0
Indianapolis, IN = 0
Atlanta, GA = 0
Minneapolis, MN = 10
Conservative, KS = 0
Clinton, NC = 0
St. Louis, MO = 0
Portland, OR = 0

Most votes currently held by a candidate = 10.
Number of candidates with the greatest number of votes = 1.
Minneapolis, MN has exceeded the quota and is elected. If there are seats remaining to be filled, the surplus will now be reallocated.
The election is complete and the elected candidates are (Minneapolis, MN).

[Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee]

This is the list of who voted for whom. Can someone review these allocations and counts before I finalize them.

Leadership
Chair:
North Carolina Yankee (15): LT, UlmerFudd, Encke, Pessimistic, Muaddib, Westy, Rover, Spark, SlippingJimmy, Bagel23, Fhtagn, Deadprez, OSR, Brother Jonathan, Joseph Cao,
Fairbol (1): Fairbol
Abstain (1): Tmth,

Vice Chair:
LT (16 ): LT, UlmerFudd, Encke, Pessimistic, Muaddib, Westy, Rover, Spark, SlippingJimmy, Bagel23, Fairbol, Fhtagn, Deadprez,  OSR,  Brother Jonathan, Joseph Cao,
Abstain (1): Tmth,

Convention City: Minneapolis, MN

Southern Governor:
MB (4): Bagel23, Deadprez, Brother Jonathan, Joseph Cao,
NOTA (6): LT, UlmerFudd, Encke, Spark, SlippingJimmy, Fairbol,
Abstain (6): Tmth, Pessimistic, Muaddib, Westy, Rover, Fhtagn,
Write-in sunrise (1):  OSR,

Southern Chamber:
Spark        (13): LT, UlmerFudd, Encke, Muaddib, Westy, Spark, SlippingJimmy, Bagel23, Fairbol, Fhtagn, Deadprez,  Brother Jonathan,  Joseph Cao,
Jessica       (13): LT, UlmerFudd, Encke, Muaddib, Westy, Spark, SlippingJimmy, Fairbol, Fhtagn, Deadprez, OSR, Brother Jonathan, Joseph Cao,
Write-in Tmth (7): LT, UlmerFudd, Encke, Muaddib, Westy, Fhtagn,  OSR,
Abstain (3): Tmth, Pessimistic, Rover,


Lincoln Governor:
ReaganClinton (12): LT, UlmerFudd, Encke, Muaddib, Westy, Spark, SlippingJimmy, Fairbol, Fhtagn, OSR, Brother Jonathan, Joseph Cao,
Abstain (4): Tmth, Rover, Bagel23, Deadprez, 


Lincoln Council:
Brother Jonathan (13): LT, UlmerFudd, Encke, Muaddib, Westy, Spark, SlippingJimmy, Bagel23, Fairbol, Fhtagn, Deadprez,  OSR, Joseph Cao,
Laki              (7): LT, UlmerFudd,  Westy, Spark, SlippingJimmy, Bagel23, Fairbol,
SO19              (4): SlippingJimmy, Bagel23, Fairbol,  OSR,
NOTA              ( ): 
Abstain (3): Tmth, Rover, Brother Jonathan,

[At-Large Senator LouisvilleThunder]

This looks correct.

[Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee]

 

Leadership
Chair: North Carolina Yankee Elected
North Carolina Yankee (15): LT, UlmerFudd, Encke, Pessimistic, Muaddib, Westy, Rover, Spark, SlippingJimmy, Bagel23, Fhtagn, Deadprez, OSR, Brother Jonathan, Joseph Cao,
Fairbol (1): Fairbol
Abstain (1): Tmth,

Vice Chair: LT Elected
LT (16 ): LT, UlmerFudd, Encke, Pessimistic, Muaddib, Westy, Rover, Spark, SlippingJimmy, Bagel23, Fairbol, Fhtagn, Deadprez,  OSR,  Brother Jonathan, Joseph Cao,
Abstain (1): Tmth,

Convention City: Minneapolis, MN Selected

Southern Governor: No Endorsement
MB (4): Bagel23, Deadprez, Brother Jonathan, Joseph Cao,
NOTA (6): LT, UlmerFudd, Encke, Spark, SlippingJimmy, Fairbol,
Abstain (6): Tmth, Pessimistic, Muaddib, Westy, Rover, Fhtagn,
Write-in sunrise (1):  OSR,

Southern Chamber: Spark, Jessica and Write-in Tmth endorsed
Spark        (13): LT, UlmerFudd, Encke, Muaddib, Westy, Spark, SlippingJimmy, Bagel23, Fairbol, Fhtagn, Deadprez,  Brother Jonathan,  Joseph Cao,
Jessica       (13): LT, UlmerFudd, Encke, Muaddib, Westy, Spark, SlippingJimmy, Fairbol, Fhtagn, Deadprez, OSR, Brother Jonathan, Joseph Cao,
Write-in Tmth (7): LT, UlmerFudd, Encke, Muaddib, Westy, Fhtagn,  OSR,
Abstain (3): Tmth, Pessimistic, Rover,


Lincoln Governor: ReaganClinton Endorsed
ReaganClinton (12): LT, UlmerFudd, Encke, Muaddib, Westy, Spark, SlippingJimmy, Fairbol, Fhtagn, OSR, Brother Jonathan, Joseph Cao,
Abstain (4): Tmth, Rover, Bagel23, Deadprez, 


Lincoln Council: Brother Jonathan Endorsed
Brother Jonathan (13): LT, UlmerFudd, Encke, Muaddib, Westy, Spark, SlippingJimmy, Bagel23, Fairbol, Fhtagn, Deadprez,  OSR, Joseph Cao,
Laki              (7): LT, UlmerFudd,  Westy, Spark, SlippingJimmy, Bagel23, Fairbol,
SO19              (4): SlippingJimmy, Bagel23, Fairbol,  OSR,
NOTA              ( ): 
Abstain (3): Tmth, Rover, Brother Jonathan,

Council and CoD are problematic here, because of the way the bylaws are written, it states that a majority must not vote against a candidate, and a two-thirds majority must not vote against them if they are a Fed. I counted blanks and abstains as no's and this meant that since Tmth was a Fed when the vote ended, he just barely gets nominated while Laki just barely loses.

[S019]

I challenge that blanks and abstains are counted as no's, for the purpose of counting, I'd prefer that the chair does not count them at all, and only counts those who voted. If the current count stands, I am looking into additional actions that can be taken. Another proposed remedy is to hold a do-over vote for the positions in question.

[Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee]

I challenge that blanks and abstains are counted as no's, for the purpose of counting, I'd prefer that the chair does not count them at all, and only counts those who voted. If the current count stands, I am looking into additional actions that can be taken. Another proposed remedy is to hold a do-over vote for the positions in question.

The bylaws require me to count the nos, because they are yes, no under the rules not IRV. This was the rule change spearheaded by ASV last summer. Therefore if you mark the candidate, it is counted as a yes, if you don't mark the candidate it is counted as a no.

https://talkelections.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=320845.msg6866443#msg6866443

4. Regional legislature elections. Not more than four weeks prior to the election, a declaration period shall be called for regional legislative elections occurring over that given period. At the conclusion of the declaration period, a primary election shall be held for these respective legislatures. A yes/no vote on endorsement shall be held for each individual candidate. A candidate from another party shall be endorsed unless a majority of votes are cast against endorsing them, while a candidate who is a member of the Federalist party shall be endorsed unless 2/3rds of votes are cast against endorsing them.

I also stated as much in the ballot itself:

A candidate must be preferenced by a majority of those voting to be nominated per the rules. NOTA cancels out the other preferences.

[/quote]

[fhtagn]

I challenge that blanks and abstains are counted as no's, for the purpose of counting, I'd prefer that the chair does not count them at all, and only counts those who voted. If the current count stands, I am looking into additional actions that can be taken. Another proposed remedy is to hold a do-over vote for the positions in question.

What you prefer is irrelevant. Go find something better to do with your time.

[AustralianSwingVoter]

The bylaws require me to count the nos, because they are yes, no under the rules not IRV. This was the rule change spearheaded by ASV last summer. Therefore if you mark the candidate, it is counted as a yes, if you don't mark the candidate it is counted as a no.

As I said at the time a straight yes/no vote on each individual candidate would be a better way of choosing endorsements for non-House of Reps races. Whether you preference someone or not is a somewhat counter-intuitive method for voting, and I'm sure would trip up some who fail to read your advice properly.

[Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee]

The bylaws require me to count the nos, because they are yes, no under the rules not IRV. This was the rule change spearheaded by ASV last summer. Therefore if you mark the candidate, it is counted as a yes, if you don't mark the candidate it is counted as a no.

As I said at the time a straight yes/no vote on each individual candidate would be a better way of choosing endorsements for non-House of Reps races. Whether you preference someone or not is a somewhat counter-intuitive method for voting, and I'm sure would trip up some who fail to read your advice properly.

I am so sick and tired of getting F2%@ over by getting stuck between you and S019. You guys aren't even Feds anymore an I am still getting screwed because of you two.

Also I am so sick of these arcane as bylaws implemented because people didn't like the results of the last round of primaries. Once again I am getting doubled over a barrel, despite the fact that I warned against it at the time that it was not good procedure to determine procedures that way then and I still feel that way.

Like it or not these are the rules you helped to bring about, if you or S019 don't like how I interpret them, then I suggest you make changes in your own parties to reflect your preferred arrangements. I sure as hell intend to strip this bullcrap as soon as possible.

[Saint Milei]

How much is Labor paying S019 to troll us?

[Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon]

How much is Labor paying S019 to troll us?

$100/post

[FairBol]

:: looks at the discussion, and laughs ::

[West_Midlander]

:: looks at the discussion, and laughs ::

Sir, I gave you my first preference when you ran for House because I agreed with your policy platform.

However, you left this party. You are mocking this party, now. What you proposed when you ran for the leadership of this party was just nice words and/or what was already being done. Please, sir, if you have nothing useful to contribute to our party's convention, do the civil thing, and begone.

[Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee]

:: looks at the discussion, and laughs ::

Sir, I gave you my first preference when you ran for House because I agreed with your policy plank.

However, you left this party. You are mocking this party, now. What you proposed when you ran for the leadership of this party was just nice words and/or what was already being done. Please, sir, if you have nothing useful to contribute to our party's convention, do the civil thing, and begone.

I also offered him a position in the leadership, actually delivering on the same proposal he offered me in the campaign.