2020 Census and Redistricting Thread: Minnesota (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 10:10:06 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  2020 Census and Redistricting Thread: Minnesota (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 2020 Census and Redistricting Thread: Minnesota  (Read 40099 times)
Stuart98
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,783
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.35, S: -5.83

« on: February 06, 2021, 11:34:48 AM »

Logged
Stuart98
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,783
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.35, S: -5.83

« Reply #1 on: February 12, 2021, 02:02:22 PM »

Ugh, I hate Duluth based snakes. You can get four Dem districts without venturing outside the twin cities metro.
Logged
Stuart98
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,783
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.35, S: -5.83

« Reply #2 on: February 21, 2021, 02:31:04 PM »

There's no point to making no county split maps before we get census data, they're universally going to require extensive reworking.
Logged
Stuart98
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,783
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.35, S: -5.83

« Reply #3 on: February 22, 2021, 07:11:40 PM »

I find it utterly hilarious how much of this thread is devoted to the idea of pairing Minneapolis and St Paul together...when that is never going to happen under any scenario.
Woke: pairing Minneapolis and ST Paul
Broke: pairing Minneapolis and Dulutch
Bespoke: pairing greater Minnesota with the twin cities

Isn't this illegal? I thought at-large districts in states with multiple representatives were made illegal in 1967.
Logged
Stuart98
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,783
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.35, S: -5.83

« Reply #4 on: March 13, 2021, 12:23:53 PM »

Why are y'all still devoting so much energy to arguing about something that literally has a zero percent chance of happening.
Logged
Stuart98
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,783
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.35, S: -5.83

« Reply #5 on: April 26, 2021, 03:13:02 PM »


Poorly aged things
Logged
Stuart98
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,783
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.35, S: -5.83

« Reply #6 on: April 26, 2021, 07:23:16 PM »
« Edited: April 26, 2021, 07:45:06 PM by Stuart98 »

Threw together a 4-3-1 map


MN-08 was Trump +0.7 in 2020; it has countervailing trends (Saint Paul suburbs trending D while the Iron Range is trending R) and should be competitive for a long time.

MN-02 is basically the same as the current iteration. It might be competitive in 2022 but long term this seat is gone for the GOP.

MN-01 is much more R than the current iteration (Trump +13.5 in 2020) and is probably safe R for the foreseeable future.

All other seats are exactly what you expect, safe for the incumbent party.
Logged
Stuart98
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,783
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.35, S: -5.83

« Reply #7 on: November 23, 2021, 04:21:59 PM »
« Edited: November 23, 2021, 04:28:55 PM by Stuart98 »

Wonder why they don't put Moorhead in MN-08; that would make it a Trump by single digits district without impacting the rest of the map.

EDIT: https://davesredistricting.org/join/6c7f3f54-284a-46bd-add4-d64397811242
Logged
Stuart98
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,783
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.35, S: -5.83

« Reply #8 on: December 03, 2021, 01:22:37 PM »

No MN GOP, a 3D-5R map in a Biden +7 state is in fact not a thing that is happening.
Logged
Stuart98
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,783
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.35, S: -5.83

« Reply #9 on: February 15, 2022, 12:13:15 AM »

Fair highly competitive MN map
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 12 queries.