2020 Census and Redistricting Thread: Washington
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 09:05:11 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  2020 Census and Redistricting Thread: Washington
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11
Author Topic: 2020 Census and Redistricting Thread: Washington  (Read 16314 times)
RussFeingoldWasRobbed
Progress96
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,247
United States


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -6.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #200 on: December 03, 2021, 12:58:51 PM »

Why did the court allow it
Logged
Roll Roons
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,035
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #201 on: December 03, 2021, 01:02:21 PM »


Given the partisanship of the state, it seems fair. You have five Safe D districts, two Safe R and two swing districts - one that leans D and one that leans R. JHB's strength makes WA-03 look more Republican than it actually is.
Logged
lfromnj
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,324


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #202 on: December 03, 2021, 01:03:14 PM »


Because why would a court want to get involved when a bipartisan map had all but passed ?
Logged
GALeftist
sansymcsansface
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,741


Political Matrix
E: -7.29, S: -9.48

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #203 on: December 03, 2021, 01:03:36 PM »

Profoundly lame.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,085
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #204 on: December 03, 2021, 01:09:21 PM »


Given the partisanship of the state, it seems fair. You have five Safe D districts, two Safe R and two swing districts - one that leans D and one that leans R. JHB's strength makes WA-03 look more Republican than it actually is.

Washington's natural political geography would entail a 7-3 or even 7-2-1 map. If we let natural geographic bias play to the GOP's favor in states like PA and WI, then I don't see why we shouldn't let it play to the Dems' favor here.
Logged
Mr.Phips
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,545


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #205 on: December 03, 2021, 01:12:50 PM »

Looks like Dems are giving up another seat in 2022 (WA-08).  Morons.
Logged
BoiseBoy
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 962
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.05, S: -1.13

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #206 on: December 03, 2021, 01:20:45 PM »

https://davesredistricting.org/join/cc4e7f00-13c1-4bd7-ac7a-1019ad86d176
Logged
GALeftist
sansymcsansface
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,741


Political Matrix
E: -7.29, S: -9.48

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #207 on: December 03, 2021, 01:25:52 PM »


Yuck, the 8th voted for Loren Culp. Probably +1 for the GOP in 2022.
Logged
BoiseBoy
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 962
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.05, S: -1.13

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #208 on: December 03, 2021, 01:51:55 PM »



WA-01: Biden +30.4 (D +9.6 from old lines)
WA-02: Biden +22.7 (R +4.2 from old lines)
WA-03: Trump +4.2 (R +0.5 from old lines)
WA-04: Trump +16.9 (D +1.2 from old lines)
WA-05: Trump +9.9 (R+0.9 from old lines)
WA-06: Biden +17.1 (D +0.3 from old lines)
WA-07: Biden +75.1 (D +2.1 from old lines)
WA-08: Biden +6.7 (D +0.2 from old lines)
WA-09: Biden +44.7 (R+ 3.8 from old lines)
WA-10: Biden +17.6 (D +2.2 from old lines)

In total, six districts shifted to the left, while four districts shifted to the right. The average shift per district was D +0.62.
Logged
Kamala's side hoe
khuzifenq
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,370
United States


P P
WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #209 on: December 03, 2021, 02:01:07 PM »


I still don’t understand why there were a lot of Asian Biden-Culpvoters (as pre-election poll crosstabs seemed to suggest), despite my sympathy to the idea of anti-establishment protest votes in Ultra Safe D states. Not that there would have been very many of them in the new 8th district, even if it includes more of Issaquah and Sammamish than I’m thinking.
Logged
Tekken_Guy
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,954
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #210 on: December 03, 2021, 04:38:16 PM »

I wonder if WA-06 or WA-10 have upset potential for the GOP.
Logged
Mr.Phips
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,545


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #211 on: December 03, 2021, 04:43:45 PM »

I wonder if WA-06 or WA-10 have upset potential for the GOP.

Biden + 17 and 18.  Even in 2018, Dems didn’t pick up any districts that Trump carried by a margin that large.
Logged
Tekken_Guy
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,954
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #212 on: December 03, 2021, 05:09:57 PM »

I wonder if WA-06 or WA-10 have upset potential for the GOP.

Biden + 17 and 18.  Even in 2018, Dems didn’t pick up any districts that Trump carried by a margin that large.

Weill they got up to Trump+15 in NY-22. They fell just short.
Logged
Mr.Phips
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,545


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #213 on: December 03, 2021, 05:21:55 PM »

I wonder if WA-06 or WA-10 have upset potential for the GOP.

Biden + 17 and 18.  Even in 2018, Dems didn’t pick up any districts that Trump carried by a margin that large.

Weill they got up to Trump+15 in NY-22. They fell just short.

Neither of these districts are as elastic as NY-22 and the incumbents are no where near as polarizing as Claudia Tenney.  A Tom Reed type would have had no trouble in NY-22.
Logged
Tekken_Guy
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,954
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #214 on: December 03, 2021, 05:26:01 PM »

I wonder if WA-06 or WA-10 have upset potential for the GOP.

Biden + 17 and 18.  Even in 2018, Dems didn’t pick up any districts that Trump carried by a margin that large.

Weill they got up to Trump+15 in NY-22. They fell just short.

Neither of these districts are as elastic as NY-22 and the incumbents are no where near as polarizing as Claudia Tenney.  A Tom Reed type would have had no trouble in NY-22.

What about OK-05 or NY-11?
Logged
Crumpets
Thinking Crumpets Crumpet
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,710
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.06, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #215 on: December 03, 2021, 06:16:17 PM »


I still don’t understand why there were a lot of Asian Biden-Culpvoters (as pre-election poll crosstabs seemed to suggest), despite my sympathy to the idea of anti-establishment protest votes in Ultra Safe D states. Not that there would have been very many of them in the new 8th district, even if it includes more of Issaquah and Sammamish than I’m thinking.

I don't know about Asian voters specifically, but it's pretty clear that Culp was both a lot more popular in Washington than Trump has ever been and that Inslee was a lot more hated by Republicans than Biden has ever been. If they were already moderate Republicans, it's not hard to see why they would find Trump unacceptable but also hate Inslee enough to vote for Culp.

Personally, I'm not too worried about WA-8. Those suburbs are rocketing leftward and there's not a ton of room for Republican growth, even if depressed turnout among traditional Democratic groups is factored in. It's still close enough that Republicans might be able to pull off a win in 2022, but it'd very likely be the last time they manage it unless the national realignment either changes or reverses suddenly.
Logged
Mr.Phips
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,545


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #216 on: December 03, 2021, 06:40:32 PM »

I wonder if WA-06 or WA-10 have upset potential for the GOP.

Biden + 17 and 18.  Even in 2018, Dems didn’t pick up any districts that Trump carried by a margin that large.

Weill they got up to Trump+15 in NY-22. They fell just short.

Neither of these districts are as elastic as NY-22 and the incumbents are no where near as polarizing as Claudia Tenney.  A Tom Reed type would have had no trouble in NY-22.

What about OK-05 or NY-11?

NY-11 was only Trump + 10 while OK-05 was Trump + 13, but trending Dem, and the Dem candidate for governor won it by double digits.
Logged
Sestak
jk2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,281
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #217 on: December 03, 2021, 10:47:51 PM »

Very funny that “fair maps” = geography in WI and drawing proportionally is a Dem gerrymander but “fair maps” in WA are proportional and drawing according to geographic advantage is a Dem gerrymander.
Logged
Kamala's side hoe
khuzifenq
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,370
United States


P P
WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #218 on: December 04, 2021, 12:18:40 AM »


I still don’t understand why there were a lot of Asian Biden-Culp voters (as pre-election poll crosstabs seemed to suggest), despite my sympathy to the idea of anti-establishment protest votes in Ultra Safe D states. Not that there would have been very many of them in the new 8th district, even if it includes more of Issaquah and Sammamish than I’m thinking.

I don't know about Asian voters specifically, but it's pretty clear that Culp was both a lot more popular in Washington than Trump has ever been and that Inslee was a lot more hated by Republicans than Biden has ever been. If they were already moderate Republicans, it's not hard to see why they would find Trump unacceptable but also hate Inslee enough to vote for Culp.

Personally, I'm not too worried about WA-8. Those suburbs are rocketing leftward and there's not a ton of room for Republican growth, even if depressed turnout among traditional Democratic groups is factored in. It's still close enough that Republicans might be able to pull off a win in 2022, but it'd very likely be the last time they manage it unless the national realignment either changes or reverses suddenly.

Yeah now that I've had a chance to check out the DRA link, I can clearly see that WA-8 will contain all of Sammamish and Issaquah, as well as parts of Kent and Auburn (and also all of Mt Rainier National Park in Pierce County, it looks like)
Logged
lfromnj
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,324


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #219 on: December 04, 2021, 02:28:15 AM »


I still don’t understand why there were a lot of Asian Biden-Culpvoters (as pre-election poll crosstabs seemed to suggest), despite my sympathy to the idea of anti-establishment protest votes in Ultra Safe D states. Not that there would have been very many of them in the new 8th district, even if it includes more of Issaquah and Sammamish than I’m thinking.

I don't know about Asian voters specifically, but it's pretty clear that Culp was both a lot more popular in Washington than Trump has ever been and that Inslee was a lot more hated by Republicans than Biden has ever been. If they were already moderate Republicans, it's not hard to see why they would find Trump unacceptable but also hate Inslee enough to vote for Culp.

Personally, I'm not too worried about WA-8. Those suburbs are rocketing leftward and there's not a ton of room for Republican growth, even if depressed turnout among traditional Democratic groups is factored in. It's still close enough that Republicans might be able to pull off a win in 2022, but it'd very likely be the last time they manage it unless the national realignment either changes or reverses suddenly.

I mean it certainly is a district that is trending leftwards but the current seat was like Obama +3, Clinton +3 and Biden +6.5 Hardly an extreme trend.
Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,406
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #220 on: December 04, 2021, 04:07:45 AM »

Ds should very likely hold WA-08 in 2022, given they have the incumbency bonus. The seat has actually gotten slightly more Democratic, so these lines are a net positive for Democrats' hopes of holding on here.
Logged
lfromnj
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,324


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #221 on: December 20, 2021, 01:45:38 AM »

https://richmond.com/news/state-and-regional/govt-and-politics/incumbents-are-an-afterthought-in-proposed-maps-for-state-house-and-senate/article_634d3898-390f-550d-9146-be16d282754f.html

Likely what causes the commision to work in WA.
Logged
Oryxslayer
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,783


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #222 on: January 28, 2022, 04:25:57 PM »



By law these changes have to be small and require 2/3s votes. No map of edits currently to be found.
Logged
BoiseBoy
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 962
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.05, S: -1.13

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #223 on: January 28, 2022, 04:49:37 PM »


By law these changes have to be small and require 2/3s votes. No map of edits currently to be found.
Who wants to read the bill itself and try to recreate the map based on the list of blocks per district?  Cheesy
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,085
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #224 on: January 29, 2022, 08:54:13 AM »

If it's a bipartisan bill, I assume it's a bunch of harmless tweaks?
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.067 seconds with 11 queries.