How would states have approached redistricting if Trump had won?

[Tekken_Guy]

How would states have approached redistricting differently if Trump had won re-election?

[Skill and Chance]

We would have seen at least one state test the limits of CVAP/registered voters apportionment.

[Mr.Phips]

We would have seen at least one state test the limits of CVAP/registered voters apportionment.

I think Texas would be the most likely candidate for that.

[lfromnj]

We would have seen at least one state test the limits of CVAP/registered voters apportionment.

I think Texas would be the most likely candidate for that.

Only state in all likelyhood. NC GOP doesn't gain anything as it just makes the Charlotte sink a bit bigger but the Triangle districts have to shrink. maybe it makes Gwinett a touch easier for GA but that's about it.
FL Cubans would be mad.

[America Needs a 13-6 Progressive SCOTUS]

We would have seen at least one state test the limits of CVAP/registered voters apportionment.

I think Texas would be the most likely candidate for that.

Only state in all likelyhood. NC doesn't gain anything, maybe it makes Gwinett a touch easier for GA but that's about it.
FL Cubans would be mad.

FL Republicans do not need the Cubans Republicans in the State Legislature to be on board in order to pass redistricting maps, as their majorities are big enough.

[ProgressiveModerate]

Depends upon how much he wins by and how.

Chances are Democrats probably would've been scared by the win, and been much more cautious, especially if they ended up losing the House.

Republicans may also have felt more comfortable going all in and as others have said testing VRA.

[Skill and Chance]

Weirdly, Missouri was one of the states most interested in switching to CVAP.  There's even a chance they still try it for the legislative maps.  Language in the R-leaning redistricting amendment that passed last year intentionally changed a total population standard to "on the basis of one-person, one-vote." 

[President Punxsutawney Phil]

Depends upon how much he wins by and how.

Chances are Democrats probably would've been scared by the win, and been much more cautious, especially if they ended up losing the House.

Republicans may also have felt more comfortable going all in and as others have said testing VRA.

Ds might actually be more aggressive if anything else. Trump re-elected means that a Trump six-year-itch in 2022 that could dislodge some GOP incumbents and rob the GOP of incumbency bonus in those districts in later elections.

[David Hume]

Depends upon how much he wins by and how.

Chances are Democrats probably would've been scared by the win, and been much more cautious, especially if they ended up losing the House.

Republicans may also have felt more comfortable going all in and as others have said testing VRA.

Ds might actually be more aggressive if anything else. Trump re-elected means that a Trump six-year-itch in 2022 that could dislodge some GOP incumbents and rob the GOP of incumbency bonus in those districts in later elections.

Ds are already very aggressive now. If Trump won, he would have pushed GOP controlled states like FL, IN, TN to go max out, since otherwise there is no chance for them to win the house in 2022.