If the DOJ changes its rules, can a sitting president be indicted?

[StateBoiler]

To go back to another reason on why I consider both parties in on the scam (e.g. congressional oversight and executive branch employees), this is something that could be easily resolved with a constitutional amendment applied at a future date (January 2021, January 2025) so that there is zero ambiguity on the matter. The reason it's not is because neither party in the legislature want to do anything that harms a potential future president from their party, because I believe every Democratic member of Congress believes a Republican president should be able to be indicted and I also believe every Republican member of Congress believes a Democratic president should be able to be indicted. The only other argument is they're lazy.

[StateBoiler]

Obviously, yes. Just a thought: I think a decent president should actually issue an order to overturn this opinion.

I think a decent president would ask Congress to write a constitutional amendment, that way the opinion of the president which changes hands from one individual to another over time has no bearing on the application of the law.

But the Democrats and Republicans in Congress are either incompetent or are part of the scam, so they won't do that.