This Once Great Movement Of Ours
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 07:22:03 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  International General Discussion (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  This Once Great Movement Of Ours
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 92 93 94 95 96 [97] 98 99 100 101 102 ... 151
Author Topic: This Once Great Movement Of Ours  (Read 151580 times)
Blair
Blair2015
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,846
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2400 on: July 27, 2022, 07:54:12 AM »

The frustrating thing is that I feel there isn’t even any appetite in the party to use the tools of the state to tame the privatised industries- the water companies are universally hated for pumping sewage into our rivers and the domestic electricity supplier market has virtually collapsed- I could live with some fudge around the ownership model if say Labour were going to basically call for a stricter price cap on bills- I mean all of the companies who would go bust have already done so!
The situation under Corbyn was that there was a fair bit of clarity on what the party wanted to do on utilities (nationalisation being such a no-brainer for the Labour Left) but no such thing as far as welfare was concerned. For a while I thought Labour under Starmer might be arriving at the reverse of that, but with Reynolds (who was genuinely trying to think creatively about this stuff) shuffled out and replaced with Ashworth (who, while not dumb at all, seems much less visible - or maybe I'm just paying less attention), it doesn't seem like we're even getting that.

Yeah I agree I was very upset that Reynolds left as he was very good in that role and clearly someone who went though a journey when he was in the Treasury Team under John Mac. I think in 2019 there was a big row over Universal Credit to the extent that John Mac wrote the policy rather than the non entity who was shadow DWP.

Labour came very close in covid to saying some radical things re universal credit and it’s weird stupid rules- it was only once the middle classes had to engage with UC that people took interest in the bubble.

I think Ashworth is more the ‘let’s get a picture of me having lunch with pensioners’ type in the role…
Logged
Blair
Blair2015
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,846
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2401 on: July 27, 2022, 07:55:36 AM »

Sam Tarry appearing to dare LOTO to sack him.

Very on brand for THIGMOO to arrive this late to a party splits story….
Logged
Leading Political Consultant Ma Anand Sheela
Heat
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,026
Poland


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2402 on: July 27, 2022, 07:58:56 AM »

Yeah I agree I was very upset that Reynolds left as he was very good in that role and clearly someone who went though a journey when he was in the Treasury Team under John Mac. I think in 2019 there was a big row over Universal Credit to the extent that John Mac wrote the policy rather than the non entity who was shadow DWP.
Having to coast on McDonnell saying 'come on, it's me' when the actual manifesto wasn't clear on what it wanted to do at all was a problem in 2017 as well. Corbyn's neglect of the Shadow DWP role has to count as a major strike against him.
Logged
MaxQue
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,626
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2403 on: July 27, 2022, 09:24:54 AM »

...but are they really trying to say no-one else in the PLP stayed awake for the "E" section of their PPE courses?

Funnily enough it happens that on that course you only follow up with two elements of the three into your Finals: Economics is usually the bit that gets dropped. There's actually a serious lack of knowledge of economics at Westminster in general at the moment, and it's a cross-party issue: the Tories have a lot of MPs with Finance backgrounds, but that's really not the same thing at all.

Over this particular issue there's a tendency towards mild dishonesty in Labour circles all round: it isn't true to say that nationalising a large swathe of utilities and infrastructure was easily affordable two years ago but is not now (even if the situation has deteriorated), but it also isn't true to say that doing that would be easily affordable at all and that it practically pays for itself. It comes down - as is usually the case with the Labour Party - to priorities rather than either possibilities or principles, and it's clear that there's been a shift there.* But I think perhaps it isn't so strange that it's difficult to discuss issues around public ownership in a straightforward manner given the Party's history: altogether too much fraught symbolism for everyone, even if most of it is beyond irrelevant to how things are now.

*Which may be related to a trickier fiscal position than a few years ago. Which may be related to the Schools And Hospitals brigade being more influential in the Shadow Cabinet than a year ago. Which may be related to the personal preferences of the two Shadow Chancellors. Though it's likely to be a combination of all, plus a few other factors as well.

The frustrating thing is that I feel there isn’t even any appetite in the party to use the tools of the state to tame the privatised industries- the water companies are universally hated for pumping sewage into our rivers and the domestic electricity supplier market has virtually collapsed- I could live with some fudge around the ownership model if say Labour were going to basically call for a stricter price cap on bills- I mean all of the companies who would go bust have already done so!

Oh there's plenty *in the party* (as opposed to the leadership)

I don't think the leadership is actually having much of a position on it (Starmer doesn't seem to know or care much abour economics), it's the terrible people like Reeves and the Oxbridge educated SpAds to care more about their bottom line than politics.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,724
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2404 on: July 27, 2022, 09:46:22 AM »
« Edited: July 27, 2022, 09:56:15 AM by Filuwaúrdjan »

The frustrating thing is that I feel there isn’t even any appetite in the party to use the tools of the state to tame the privatised industries- the water companies are universally hated for pumping sewage into our rivers and the domestic electricity supplier market has virtually collapsed- I could live with some fudge around the ownership model if say Labour were going to basically call for a stricter price cap on bills- I mean all of the companies who would go bust have already done so!

One plausible scenario for a Starmer government as regards the water companies is an attempt to bring them to heel through regulation followed by a decision to pull a Railtrack > Network Rail out of frustration if things don't improve or don't improve fast enough: particularly if there are serious issues with supply and drought in the more populated parts of the country. One thing worth bearing in mind is that public ownership of water is not a panacea in itself (Scottish Water, which is publicly owned, actually has an even worse record on sewerage release than most of the privately owned firms in England) and more thought as to alternative models of public ownership in the sector to the standard British one would be useful. Energy is an interesting case as while there's a very strong technocratic case for nationalising power generation, the argument (though not non-existent) isn't as strong for the rest of the sector and there is a good political reason to be wary of having the government be seen to have a direct role in setting energy prices, particularly these days. But I think over energy policy governments, no matter their colour, are going to have to be making major decisions on the fly quite a lot in the future, whether they want to or not.
Logged
Blair
Blair2015
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,846
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2405 on: July 27, 2022, 11:16:14 AM »
« Edited: July 27, 2022, 11:23:35 AM by Blair »

Tarry sacked.

He wasn’t exactly subtle but equally why give him what he wants?
Logged
Blair
Blair2015
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,846
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2406 on: July 27, 2022, 11:24:36 AM »

Always happens in August and September doesn’t it.

Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,724
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2407 on: July 27, 2022, 01:11:23 PM »

Bit of a bizarre suicide-by-cop situation, but I wouldn't have indulged him and don't really see the point in doing so.
Logged
CityofSinners
Rookie
**
Posts: 207


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2408 on: July 27, 2022, 01:24:33 PM »

Bit of a bizarre suicide-by-cop situation, but I wouldn't have indulged him and don't really see the point in doing so.

If you don't give Tarry the firing he wants, his most logical move would be to escalate. Give even more interviews, make up more policy and escalate attacks on the party for not backing the strikes.

At that point Starmer has to fire him, if he wants to keep any credibility. Which gives you the same result just with a bigger more drawn out story.

There is no good solution. Firing Tarry and getting it over with seems the least damaging.
Logged
MaxQue
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,626
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2409 on: July 27, 2022, 01:48:03 PM »

Bit of a bizarre suicide-by-cop situation, but I wouldn't have indulged him and don't really see the point in doing so.

He's probably afraid the far-right of the party will resume plotting against him and briefing hostile newspapers id he does nothing.

There is an easy solution. Remove that silly ban on the frontbench attending picket lines.
Logged
JimJamUK
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 878
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2410 on: July 27, 2022, 02:01:42 PM »

Just noticed something really surprising in Yougov data (so probably MOE). Starmer has a higher net favourability rating among Con2019-Lab2022 voters (57%) than he does among current Labour voters (52%). Obviously he has tried to moderate the party in ways that alienate core Labour voters (who nonetheless keep voting Labour), but to have that high a net favourability rating among people who’s attachment to the Labour Party is weak enough they voted Conservative at the last election is surprising. It does suggest that the people who are already switching are not going to rush back to the Conservatives, and they’ll still hope to win over at least some of the ‘negative about everyone’ don’t knows.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,724
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2411 on: July 27, 2022, 02:19:36 PM »

The plural of anecdote is not data and I don't have a huge amount of faith in YouGov internals, but... that does track with what I've come across anecdotally. I'd say 'welcome to vibes-based politics', but in reality we've been there a while.
Logged
CumbrianLefty
CumbrianLeftie
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,823
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2412 on: July 28, 2022, 06:45:58 AM »

Always happens in August and September doesn’t it.

Well its still July at the moment, which doesn't exactly fill me with optimism.
Logged
Blair
Blair2015
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,846
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2413 on: July 28, 2022, 03:55:34 PM »

Yes, and the fact also remains (though some have tried to write it out of history) that Labour got 41% of the GB vote in 2017 - something that remains woefully under-analysed (by most of Corbyn's backers as well as opponents, it has to be said)

Conference is timed perfectly for the meltdown when Truss starts polling ahead!
Logged
JimJamUK
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 878
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2414 on: July 28, 2022, 04:00:21 PM »

Michael Crick says Rosie Duffield has been re-selected (and not even very close),

Logged
Blair
Blair2015
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,846
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2415 on: July 28, 2022, 04:05:34 PM »

Interesting but not shocking.

Labour members in my experience have a range of views on that issue; I know some people on the left who have refused to vote for slates because they contained GC members of the left, I know some on the right who are very pro trans (imo largely the same demographic as me), some older members who still barely understand the issue post 2004 and ofc some women (often those in their 40-50s) who would consider themselves progressive on every other social issue…
Logged
Coldstream
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,997
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -6.59, S: 1.20

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2416 on: July 28, 2022, 04:17:50 PM »

Trans issues have become as much of a dividing line as the EU/anti-semitism were 16-19, perhaps more so as those issues have become less prominent. I wouldn’t be surprised if there were GC corbynites who backed Duffield, or indeed people to the right of her (since Duffield isn’t seen as on the right by the right) for the same reason. Whilst there will be plenty in the 65 who voted to trigger her who also backed Keir.

Ian Byrne in Liverpool West Derby looks to be in trouble. That wouldn’t be as shocking as it first appears, the seat was always the least left of all in Bristol - and it’s hard left MP Bob Wareing was deselected in 2007. Though Wareing was one of the most appalling people to have the Labour whip since Oswald Mosley, so he faced cross-factional support for deselection.
Logged
Blair
Blair2015
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,846
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2417 on: July 29, 2022, 02:07:03 AM »

Trans issues have become as much of a dividing line as the EU/anti-semitism were 16-19, perhaps more so as those issues have become less prominent. I wouldn’t be surprised if there were GC corbynites who backed Duffield, or indeed people to the right of her (since Duffield isn’t seen as on the right by the right) for the same reason. Whilst there will be plenty in the 65 who voted to trigger her who also backed Keir.

Ian Byrne in Liverpool West Derby looks to be in trouble. That wouldn’t be as shocking as it first appears, the seat was always the least left of all in Bristol - and it’s hard left MP Bob Wareing was deselected in 2007. Though Wareing was one of the most appalling people to have the Labour whip since Oswald Mosley, so he faced cross-factional support for deselection.

MP for Belgrade North was his nickname, of course because of his lavish pro Serbian views. A vile man, who was actually in the end de-selected for being lazy. It’s v funny how parties are a lot more well strict on these things- for good reason.

I think Byrne is a special case as a very popular local councillor was kept of the shortlist and it was a perceived stitch up- with some on the left being angry too. But this is Liverpool Labour politics so god knows what is true!

Logged
Coldstream
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,997
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -6.59, S: 1.20

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2418 on: July 29, 2022, 03:21:47 AM »

Trans issues have become as much of a dividing line as the EU/anti-semitism were 16-19, perhaps more so as those issues have become less prominent. I wouldn’t be surprised if there were GC corbynites who backed Duffield, or indeed people to the right of her (since Duffield isn’t seen as on the right by the right) for the same reason. Whilst there will be plenty in the 65 who voted to trigger her who also backed Keir.

Ian Byrne in Liverpool West Derby looks to be in trouble. That wouldn’t be as shocking as it first appears, the seat was always the least left of all in Bristol - and it’s hard left MP Bob Wareing was deselected in 2007. Though Wareing was one of the most appalling people to have the Labour whip since Oswald Mosley, so he faced cross-factional support for deselection.

MP for Belgrade North was his nickname, of course because of his lavish pro Serbian views. A vile man, who was actually in the end de-selected for being lazy. It’s v funny how parties are a lot more well strict on these things- for good reason.

I think Byrne is a special case as a very popular local councillor was kept of the shortlist and it was a perceived stitch up- with some on the left being angry too. But this is Liverpool Labour politics so god knows what is true!



Indeed, there was something about Wareing to dislike for everyone.

I actually think Byrne has a (slim) chance of winning reselection - like how Hodge & Johnson did in 2019. It does feel like there’s support for someone else rather than the widespread opposition to him seen with regards to Begum & Tarry.
Logged
Continential
The Op
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,564
Political Matrix
E: 1.10, S: -5.30

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2419 on: July 29, 2022, 03:27:20 AM »


Hopefully she loses to the Tories.
Logged
Secretary of State Liberal Hack
IBNU
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,901
Singapore


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2420 on: July 29, 2022, 04:55:35 AM »


Trans issues have become as much of a dividing line as the EU/anti-semitism were 16-19, perhaps more so as those issues have become less prominent. I wouldn’t be surprised if there were GC corbynites who backed Duffield, or indeed people to the right of her (since Duffield isn’t seen as on the right by the right) for the same reason. Whilst there will be plenty in the 65 who voted to trigger her who also backed Keir.

Ian Byrne in Liverpool West Derby looks to be in trouble. That wouldn’t be as shocking as it first appears, the seat was always the least left of all in Bristol - and it’s hard left MP Bob Wareing was deselected in 2007. Though Wareing was one of the most appalling people to have the Labour whip since Oswald Mosley, so he faced cross-factional support for deselection.
Worse than George Galloway ?
Logged
CumbrianLefty
CumbrianLeftie
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,823
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2421 on: July 29, 2022, 04:56:44 AM »

Trans issues have become as much of a dividing line as the EU/anti-semitism were 16-19, perhaps more so as those issues have become less prominent. I wouldn’t be surprised if there were GC corbynites who backed Duffield, or indeed people to the right of her (since Duffield isn’t seen as on the right by the right) for the same reason. Whilst there will be plenty in the 65 who voted to trigger her who also backed Keir.

Ian Byrne in Liverpool West Derby looks to be in trouble. That wouldn’t be as shocking as it first appears, the seat was always the least left of all in Bristol - and it’s hard left MP Bob Wareing was deselected in 2007. Though Wareing was one of the most appalling people to have the Labour whip since Oswald Mosley, so he faced cross-factional support for deselection.

MP for Belgrade North was his nickname, of course because of his lavish pro Serbian views. A vile man, who was actually in the end de-selected for being lazy. It’s v funny how parties are a lot more well strict on these things- for good reason.

I think Byrne is a special case as a very popular local councillor was kept of the shortlist and it was a perceived stitch up- with some on the left being angry too. But this is Liverpool Labour politics so god knows what is true!



Indeed, there was something about Wareing to dislike for everyone.

I actually think Byrne has a (slim) chance of winning reselection - like how Hodge & Johnson did in 2019. It does feel like there’s support for someone else rather than the widespread opposition to him seen with regards to Begum & Tarry.

Well the support for someone else thing also applies to Tarry doesn't it, if not even more so.

And the Byzantine inticracies of internal TH politics re Begum leave me as baffled as most outsiders.
Logged
Coldstream
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,997
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -6.59, S: 1.20

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2422 on: July 29, 2022, 05:13:18 AM »

Trans issues have become as much of a dividing line as the EU/anti-semitism were 16-19, perhaps more so as those issues have become less prominent. I wouldn’t be surprised if there were GC corbynites who backed Duffield, or indeed people to the right of her (since Duffield isn’t seen as on the right by the right) for the same reason. Whilst there will be plenty in the 65 who voted to trigger her who also backed Keir.

Ian Byrne in Liverpool West Derby looks to be in trouble. That wouldn’t be as shocking as it first appears, the seat was always the least left of all in Bristol - and it’s hard left MP Bob Wareing was deselected in 2007. Though Wareing was one of the most appalling people to have the Labour whip since Oswald Mosley, so he faced cross-factional support for deselection.

MP for Belgrade North was his nickname, of course because of his lavish pro Serbian views. A vile man, who was actually in the end de-selected for being lazy. It’s v funny how parties are a lot more well strict on these things- for good reason.

I think Byrne is a special case as a very popular local councillor was kept of the shortlist and it was a perceived stitch up- with some on the left being angry too. But this is Liverpool Labour politics so god knows what is true!



Indeed, there was something about Wareing to dislike for everyone.

I actually think Byrne has a (slim) chance of winning reselection - like how Hodge & Johnson did in 2019. It does feel like there’s support for someone else rather than the widespread opposition to him seen with regards to Begum & Tarry.

Well the support for someone else thing also applies to Tarry doesn't it, if not even more so.

And the Byzantine inticracies of internal TH politics re Begum leave me as baffled as most outsiders.

Byrne & Tarry aren’t really comparable, in Liverpool West Derby it was felt that there was someone better - but no one considered the entire selection illegitimate.
Logged
Coldstream
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,997
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -6.59, S: 1.20

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2423 on: July 29, 2022, 05:15:41 AM »

On Tarry, he’s apparently considering carpet bagging to Dagenham with Jon Cruddas standing down in the likely event he loses reselection in Ilford.

There are more prominent local candidates, but, Tarry & Cruddas aren’t as far apart politically as they might seem - they’ve both got a souveranist streak.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,724
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2424 on: July 29, 2022, 06:46:22 AM »

Wasn't Tarry a councillor there for a time or am I misremembering?
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 92 93 94 95 96 [97] 98 99 100 101 102 ... 151  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.067 seconds with 12 queries.