Imagine wanting to be a part of a community.
Imagine thinking that NOT subjagating individuals somehow deprives others of liberty. "Oh no, she went outside, what about my right to deprive her of her right to go outside?" Just more of the moronic argument that people somehow have a "right" to have government affirmatively act to oppress the rights of others. If I had a nickel for every stupid quip I've heard about how not banning guns violates some mythical right to "not feel scared about others having guns"... It makes no logical sense to claim that saying people can CHOOSE if they go out or not is actually "choosing" for those who stay indoors because there is still a small risk of contamination later on. If we are bad for "choosing" for others, why do the fearful get to then choose for us? That's not fair, its anti-choice.
Poll
