If Bush had focused on the pacific northwest in 2000, would they be less Democratic? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 03:26:14 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  If Bush had focused on the pacific northwest in 2000, would they be less Democratic? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: If Bush had focused on the pacific northwest in 2000, would they be less Democratic?  (Read 1818 times)
S019
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,340
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -4.13, S: -1.39

P P P

« on: May 25, 2020, 12:10:55 AM »

Oregon was one of the closest states in 2000 and Washington was also targeted, but in 2004, both became much more Democratic, so no I don't think there would be a long term change.
Logged
S019
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,340
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -4.13, S: -1.39

P P P

« Reply #1 on: May 25, 2020, 01:22:01 AM »

Oregon was one of the closest states in 2000 and Washington was also targeted, but in 2004, both became much more Democratic, so no I don't think there would be a long term change.

See this is where you guys are so clueless. Bush did better in Oregon in 2004 than he did in 2000.

Let's call it Minnesota syndrome. Trump did worse than Romney in Minnesota. Don't look at the margin, look at the raw numbers.

I was referring to margin, and anyways, both states clearly swung D in 2004 and never looked back, them going D was inevitable.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 12 queries.