If Bush had focused on the pacific northwest in 2000, would they be less Democratic? (user search)

Talk Elections Forum Contact | US Election Atlas Election 2024 Election Results Election Info Atlas Wiki

	Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? April 27, 2024, 02:30:59 AM

News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

Talk Elections

Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion

Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)

If Bush had focused on the pacific northwest in 2000, would they be less Democratic? (search mode)

Pages: [1]

Author

Topic: If Bush had focused on the pacific northwest in 2000, would they be less Democratic? (Read 1815 times)

morgankingsley
Junior Chimp

Posts: 5,018

Re: If Bush had focused on the pacific northwest in 2000, would they be less Democratic?

« on: May 24, 2020, 12:38:42 AM »

Maybe slightly but not enough to change the overall path

Logged

morgankingsley
Junior Chimp

Posts: 5,018

Re: If Bush had focused on the pacific northwest in 2000, would they be less Democratic?

« Reply #1 on: May 28, 2020, 03:27:08 PM »

Quote from: 😂 on May 25, 2020, 01:28:35 AM

Lol, what. In this case, you're losing with 46% either way.

If somebody has 46 percent, but another person has 44, and third parties combine ten percent, then 46 percent wins because they have the most votes. If you have 46 percent, and your opponent had 49, and third parties make 5, then you lose because your opponent has the most votes. Wilson won Idaho with only 32 percent because he had the most votes in Idaho. So it is possible to win with 46 percent

Logged

Pages: [1]

Jump to:

Page created in 0.03 seconds with 12 queries.