TX PPP/Democracy Toolbox (D): Biden +1 (4/27-28)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2024, 09:55:52 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  TX PPP/Democracy Toolbox (D): Biden +1 (4/27-28)
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 4
Author Topic: TX PPP/Democracy Toolbox (D): Biden +1 (4/27-28)  (Read 4430 times)
krb08
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 274
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: -7.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: April 29, 2020, 11:07:12 AM »
« edited: April 29, 2020, 11:11:19 AM by krb08 »

https://static.texastribune.org/media/files/d72e152a3ad3380ae5a007c0849f2dd1/DTPPP-Texas-April27-28-2020.pdf

Biden 47%, Trump 46%, Not sure 7%

Trump approval: 46% approve, 49% disapprove

2016 vote: Trump 51%, Clinton 42%
Logged
Frenchrepublican
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,278


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: April 29, 2020, 11:20:45 AM »

But Atlas told me that PPP was a serious pollster.
Logged
ON Progressive
OntarioProgressive
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,106
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -8.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: April 29, 2020, 11:21:44 AM »

But Atlas told me that PPP was a serious pollster.

“The only serious pollsters are the pollsters that show me results that fit my priors”
Logged
JRP1994
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,048


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: April 29, 2020, 11:23:38 AM »

"You can talk about your border wall
And sing of covfefe
But Atlas red Texas
Is the only one for me"
Logged
Bidenworth2020
politicalmasta73
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,407
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: April 29, 2020, 11:23:43 AM »

But Atlas told me that PPP was a serious pollster.
I don't totally buy this poll, but throwing it out just because it doesn't fit your narrative, particularly when the Trump v. Clinton numbers are identical to what the actual 2016 result was, is not smart.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,527
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: April 29, 2020, 11:24:20 AM »

But Atlas told me that PPP was a serious pollster.

They aren't? A Biden +1 result can exist in the same polling universe as a Trump +5 result.
Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,750
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: April 29, 2020, 11:24:26 AM »

Frenchrepublican reacting to this poll

Logged
Frenchrepublican
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,278


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: April 29, 2020, 11:26:47 AM »

But Atlas told me that PPP was a serious pollster.

“The only serious pollsters are the pollsters that show me results that fit my priors”

Yeah, because you really believe that Trump is losing independants by 16 points and that republicans have only a +3 advantage gap in Texas ? In this case I have a seafront home in the Alps for you.
Logged
Frenchrepublican
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,278


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: April 29, 2020, 11:29:23 AM »

Frenchrepublican reacting to this poll



Well, here is your reaction.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erection
Logged
Politician
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,986
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.13, S: -0.87

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: April 29, 2020, 11:30:51 AM »

Texas is going to vote D. Trump is beyond over at this point.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,527
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: April 29, 2020, 11:30:59 AM »

But Atlas told me that PPP was a serious pollster.

“The only serious pollsters are the pollsters that show me results that fit my priors”

Yeah, because you really believe that Trump is losing independants by 16 points and that republicans have only a +3 advantage gap in Texas ? In this case I have a seafront home in the Alps for you.

They nailed the Beto/Cruz margin in 2018.
Logged
ON Progressive
OntarioProgressive
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,106
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -8.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: April 29, 2020, 11:31:34 AM »

But Atlas told me that PPP was a serious pollster.

“The only serious pollsters are the pollsters that show me results that fit my priors”

Yeah, because you really believe that Trump is losing independants by 16 points and that republicans have only a +3 advantage gap in Texas ? In this case I have a seafront home in the Alps for you.

President Mitt Romney agrees that unskewing partisan ID in polls always works well.
Logged
Frenchrepublican
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,278


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: April 29, 2020, 11:34:53 AM »

But Atlas told me that PPP was a serious pollster.

“The only serious pollsters are the pollsters that show me results that fit my priors”

Yeah, because you really believe that Trump is losing independants by 16 points and that republicans have only a +3 advantage gap in Texas ? In this case I have a seafront home in the Alps for you.

They nailed the Beto/Cruz margin in 2018.

Now look at the numbers of races where they overestimated the democrat. Also, in 2018 the TX electorate was R+7 and Cruz lost independants by 4 (so Trump losing by 16 is not plausible)
Logged
Frenchrepublican
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,278


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: April 29, 2020, 11:36:37 AM »

But Atlas told me that PPP was a serious pollster.

“The only serious pollsters are the pollsters that show me results that fit my priors”

Yeah, because you really believe that Trump is losing independants by 16 points and that republicans have only a +3 advantage gap in Texas ? In this case I have a seafront home in the Alps for you.

President Mitt Romney agrees that unskewing partisan ID in polls always works well.

Ask president Clinton how believing blindly the polls works well.
Logged
GeorgiaModerate
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,679


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: April 29, 2020, 11:41:12 AM »

But Atlas told me that PPP was a serious pollster.

They aren't? A Biden +1 result can exist in the same polling universe as a Trump +5 result.

Some people (and I don't mean Gass here) do not understand margin of error.
Logged
GeorgiaModerate
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,679


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: April 29, 2020, 11:43:19 AM »

But Atlas told me that PPP was a serious pollster.

“The only serious pollsters are the pollsters that show me results that fit my priors”

Yeah, because you really believe that Trump is losing independants by 16 points and that republicans have only a +3 advantage gap in Texas ? In this case I have a seafront home in the Alps for you.

President Mitt Romney agrees that unskewing partisan ID in polls always works well.

Ask president Clinton how believing blindly the polls works well.

On average, the final polls were close to the national margin -- well within the MoE.

But if you feel that polls should not be trusted, then why do you even bother to follow this board?  Or is it only the polls that don't fit your narrative that you think shouldn't be trusted?  If so, at least be honest about it.
Logged
Bidenworth2020
politicalmasta73
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,407
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: April 29, 2020, 11:48:00 AM »

But Atlas told me that PPP was a serious pollster.

“The only serious pollsters are the pollsters that show me results that fit my priors”

Yeah, because you really believe that Trump is losing independants by 16 points and that republicans have only a +3 advantage gap in Texas ? In this case I have a seafront home in the Alps for you.

President Mitt Romney agrees that unskewing partisan ID in polls always works well.

Ask president Clinton how believing blindly the polls works well.
This just exemplifies your ignorance. While yes, polls in the crucial midwestern battleground states overestimated Clinton in 2016, thus causing her to lose the election, Texas polls actually underestimated both Clinton and O'Rourke in 2016/18.
Logged
Gracile
gracile
Moderators
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,063


Political Matrix
E: -8.00, S: -7.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: April 29, 2020, 11:50:27 AM »

It's really not that unbelievable when you consider that Biden is polling in the high single-digits nationally (obviously it's not a sign that Biden is guaranteed to win this, but it lines up with how one might expect Texas to vote relative to the nation).
Logged
TrendsareUsuallyReal
TrendsareReal
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,098
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: April 29, 2020, 11:52:33 AM »
« Edited: April 29, 2020, 11:56:27 AM by TrendsareUsuallyReal »

over-under on if Computer has a bigger metlldown than French Republican?
Logged
ajc0918
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,910
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: April 29, 2020, 11:56:21 AM »

LMAO

Good riddance DJT
Logged
Frenchrepublican
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,278


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: April 29, 2020, 12:02:53 PM »

But Atlas told me that PPP was a serious pollster.

“The only serious pollsters are the pollsters that show me results that fit my priors”

Yeah, because you really believe that Trump is losing independants by 16 points and that republicans have only a +3 advantage gap in Texas ? In this case I have a seafront home in the Alps for you.

President Mitt Romney agrees that unskewing partisan ID in polls always works well.

Ask president Clinton how believing blindly the polls works well.

On average, the final polls were close to the national margin -- well within the MoE.

But if you feel that polls should not be trusted, then why do you even bother to follow this board?  Or is it only the polls that don't fit your narrative that you think shouldn't be trusted?  If so, at least be honest about it.

The national polls done in the last two weeks of the race were on average fairly accurate. That doesn't mean that statewide polls, especially those done in competitive states were accurate.
National polls can generally be trusted when you average them. Now taking individual statewide polls, especially when they come from partisan pollster, at their face value is more risky, especially when they are not numerous enough to have a statistically significant average.

Anyway if you don't believe me just look at how disconnected national polls and statewide polls are.
On the RCP national average Biden is at +6.3, which would result in a solid victory but not a overwhelmingly one. Now at the same time you have a OH poll which has Trump down by 1, one in TX which has also Biden up by 1 and another one in North Carolina which has Trump down by 5. These polls, if you take them at their face value would result in a Biden landslide in which he would win the PV by double digits.
Logged
YE
Moderator
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,740


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: -0.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: April 29, 2020, 12:08:33 PM »

I don’t have any problems with the pollster itself. PPP is a reputable enough pollster. But given it’s not even May, it doesn’t have that much meaning. If polls are like this 3-5 months from now, then we’ll talk.
Logged
ProudModerate2
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,453
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: April 29, 2020, 12:10:12 PM »

Hello Texas!
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,166


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: April 29, 2020, 12:14:47 PM »

A) PPP is not a bad pollster

B) How is Biden +1 *that* unbelievable? Trump's #s are in the crapper right now, and Beto lost by 2 in 2018. Not to mention, Abbott's 58/30 approval is one of the lower approvals we've seen for a gov recently, especially in an R state.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,634
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: April 29, 2020, 12:26:40 PM »

Great news
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 4  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.065 seconds with 12 queries.