SENATE BILL: Single Use Glass and Plastic Discouraging Act (Failed) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 09:26:04 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  SENATE BILL: Single Use Glass and Plastic Discouraging Act (Failed) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: SENATE BILL: Single Use Glass and Plastic Discouraging Act (Failed)  (Read 2403 times)
Esteemed Jimmy
Jimmy7812
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,402
United States
Political Matrix
E: 2.47, S: -1.05

« on: April 24, 2020, 11:40:38 AM »

I don't support this bill as written. Section 2 will be a big tax on the poor. I also have a big problem with Section 4 since a lot of those uses don't have a cost-effective alternative material.
Logged
Esteemed Jimmy
Jimmy7812
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,402
United States
Political Matrix
E: 2.47, S: -1.05

« Reply #1 on: May 02, 2020, 12:02:03 AM »

I don't support this bill as written. Section 2 will be a big tax on the poor. I also have a big problem with Section 4 since a lot of those uses don't have a cost-effective alternative material.

Reiterating this earlier point now that I'm in the Senate. I would support an amended version of Section 2 though that is more reasonable, but not the rest of the bill as written.
Logged
Esteemed Jimmy
Jimmy7812
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,402
United States
Political Matrix
E: 2.47, S: -1.05

« Reply #2 on: May 10, 2020, 12:43:52 PM »

I still oppose this bill as written. What amounts to a small tax of $10-15 a week for those buying groceries real adds up to those with little money.
Logged
Esteemed Jimmy
Jimmy7812
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,402
United States
Political Matrix
E: 2.47, S: -1.05

« Reply #3 on: May 10, 2020, 01:07:56 PM »

I still oppose this bill as written. What amounts to a small tax of $10-15 a week for those buying groceries real adds up to those with little money.

Wait, do people not use reusable bags? My family has been using them (or sometimes, cardboard crates) for the past line 5 years without issue tbh

Also the tax is literally 5 cents per bag. At most I would expect somewhere around 50 cents a week per household to be paid. 10-15$ a month implies something on the order of 200 plastic bags lol.

I meant the "deposits". Also in many areas, in my area, there are very few if any recycling programs and grocery stores are like 45 minutes drive away in some cases. This will leave poor rural areas and rural areas overall suffering from the deposit "tax", do to the additional burden of getting the refund.

I'd prefer if Section 2 was rewritten into a refund-only program.
Logged
Esteemed Jimmy
Jimmy7812
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,402
United States
Political Matrix
E: 2.47, S: -1.05

« Reply #4 on: June 07, 2020, 07:59:25 PM »

No objections.
Logged
Esteemed Jimmy
Jimmy7812
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,402
United States
Political Matrix
E: 2.47, S: -1.05

« Reply #5 on: June 14, 2020, 05:58:02 PM »

I motion for a final vote since no one wants to go forward with this it seems and we can’t keep twiddling our thumbs.

I second the motion.
Logged
Esteemed Jimmy
Jimmy7812
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,402
United States
Political Matrix
E: 2.47, S: -1.05

« Reply #6 on: June 17, 2020, 05:52:24 PM »

Nay
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.036 seconds with 12 queries.