Does South Carolina have too much, too little, or an ok amount of influence on who gets nominated? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 11:14:12 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Process (Moderator: muon2)
  Does South Carolina have too much, too little, or an ok amount of influence on who gets nominated? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Does South Carolina have too much, too little, or an ok amount of influence on who gets nominated?
#1
Too much (D)
 
#2
Too much (R)
 
#3
Too much (I)
 
#4
Too little (D)
 
#5
Too little (R)
 
#6
Too little (I)
 
#7
An ok amount (D)
 
#8
An ok amount (R)
 
#9
An ok amount (I)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 84

Author Topic: Does South Carolina have too much, too little, or an ok amount of influence on who gets nominated?  (Read 7956 times)
lfromnj
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,361


« on: January 23, 2021, 08:04:27 AM »

Seems okay.  South Carolina is a Republican base state and a reasonably good microcosm of the party for their primary.

For Democrats, South Carolina is a test run for how the presidential candidates are doing with the black vote.  This is very important for us.  Is there some other state which could fill that role better?

Nevada would be the best for either party to do number 1. Includes the least chance a Warren or Cruz candidate can win due to the lack of that upscale base for either party. Also has a relatively diverse population.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 13 queries.