Does South Carolina have too much, too little, or an ok amount of influence on who gets nominated? (user search)

Talk Elections Forum Contact | US Election Atlas Election 2024 Election Results Election Info Atlas Wiki

	Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? April 27, 2024, 04:09:37 PM

News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

Talk Elections

Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion

Presidential Election Process (Moderator: muon2)

Does South Carolina have too much, too little, or an ok amount of influence on who gets nominated? (search mode)

Pages: [1]

Poll

Question:

Does South Carolina have too much, too little, or an ok amount of influence on who gets nominated?

#1 Too much (D)		29 (34.5%)
#2 Too much (R)		10 (11.9%)
#3 Too much (I)		11 (13.1%)
#4 Too little (D)		3 (3.6%)
#5 Too little (R)		0 (0%)
#6 Too little (I)		1 (1.2%)
#7 An ok amount (D)		15 (17.9%)
#8 An ok amount (R)		5 (6%)
#9 An ok amount (I)		10 (11.9%)

Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 84

Author

Topic: Does South Carolina have too much, too little, or an ok amount of influence on who gets nominated? (Read 7930 times)

gerritcole
goatofalltrades
Jr. Member

Posts: 1,976

Re: Does South Carolina have too much, too little, or an ok amount of influence on who gets nominate

« on: January 25, 2021, 11:05:10 PM »

Quote from: AlterEgo on January 24, 2021, 10:40:12 AM

Quote from: #PACK THE COURTS on January 23, 2021, 03:46:27 PM

Too much, and Iowa/New Hampshire/Nevada also have too much.

We need a national all at once primary.

A single national primary day over-advantages establishment candidates with deep donor pockets and strong name recognition. Puts in major barriers to lesser-know candidates.

With the internet there are far fewer barriers to entry and I would say that $$$ has less of an impact than ppl think

Logged

Pages: [1]

Jump to:

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 14 queries.