Opinion of the Bible's literalism/historic-truth/scientific-truth/perfection? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 09:00:26 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Religion & Philosophy (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  Opinion of the Bible's literalism/historic-truth/scientific-truth/perfection? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Parts of the Bible are divinely-inspired, but not all of the Bible is literally true, in historical or scientific understanding or even moral teaching -- and that truth from God can come from other sources besides the Bible too... (see post)
#1
Agree
 
#2
Disagree
 
#3
Unsure
 
#4
Not Christian
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 28

Author Topic: Opinion of the Bible's literalism/historic-truth/scientific-truth/perfection?  (Read 2889 times)
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,144
United States


« on: December 29, 2020, 04:40:33 PM »

Also, how important is the Hebrew part of the Bible to most Christians. Do you have to take any of it literally to be a Christian?

The Hebrew Bible is (more or less) literally half of the Christian Testament so I would say yes, probably.

I thought that the New Testament essentially "repealed and replaced" the Old Testament in terms of being the "guiding book for Christians"?

Only if you are a Marcionist heretic.

Every mainstream sect and even most of the odd sects consider the Law to still be valid. What they differ about is how to obtain Grace and who can receive it.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 14 queries.