Opinion of the Bible's literalism/historic-truth/scientific-truth/perfection?

[Del Tachi]

You're asking 11 separate questions as a yes or no question, dude

[Del Tachi]

You're asking 11 separate questions as a yes or no question, dude

No. I can see how some might see it as 2 questions, even though it's really still one question. But not more than 2. Definitely not "11."

The question, even more simplified is: Do you agree or disagree with the opinion that the Bible and Truth From God only overlap in some areas, and aren't completely equal to each other?

I can see at least 11 explicitly-separable questions in your post:

1.  Is there divine inspiration in the Bible?
2.  Are only parts of the Bible divinely-inspired?
3.  Is the entirety of the Bible literally true?
4.  Is the history presented in the Bible literally true?
5.  Is the science presented in the Bible literally true?
6.  Is the moral teaching presented in the Bible literally true? (does moral teaching being "literally true" even make sense? )
7.  Can truth about God come from sources other than the Bible?
8.  Can truth about God come from other (Christian or non-Christian ) religious texts?
9.  Can truth about God come from improved science?
10.  Can truth about God come from personal intuition?
11.  Can truth about God come from other people?